<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Swansea West</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-264638</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 12:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-264638</guid>
		<description>so would the others, surely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so would the others, surely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-264618</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 10:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-264618</guid>
		<description>The CACI report on possible new boundaires suggested a Swansea &amp; Pontlliw (76179), Gorseinon &amp; Bishopston (76541) and  
Pontardawe/Clydach &amp; Pontardulais (76220). The first would clearly have a Labour lead, any thoughts on the other 2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CACI report on possible new boundaires suggested a Swansea &amp; Pontlliw (76179), Gorseinon &amp; Bishopston (76541) and<br />
Pontardawe/Clydach &amp; Pontardulais (76220). The first would clearly have a Labour lead, any thoughts on the other 2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-264596</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2010 00:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-264596</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t claim to know this area that well, but those seats look dead weird to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t claim to know this area that well, but those seats look dead weird to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalek</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-264585</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 23:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-264585</guid>
		<description>With the reduction of 10 of 40 seats, would it be correct to assume that the area covered by 4 seats (Gower, Swansea East, Swansea West and Neath) become three seats?

Gower &amp; Swansea West
Neath &amp; Gowerton
Swansea East 

&#039;Gower &amp; Swansea West&#039; would be interesting because it would not cover more Labour West Central Swansea or the more urban part of the Gower constituency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the reduction of 10 of 40 seats, would it be correct to assume that the area covered by 4 seats (Gower, Swansea East, Swansea West and Neath) become three seats?</p>
<p>Gower &amp; Swansea West<br />
Neath &amp; Gowerton<br />
Swansea East </p>
<p>&#8216;Gower &amp; Swansea West&#8217; would be interesting because it would not cover more Labour West Central Swansea or the more urban part of the Gower constituency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy JS</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-264583</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-264583</guid>
		<description>The Tory vote rose slightly more than the LD vote which could have cost the LDs the seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tory vote rose slightly more than the LD vote which could have cost the LDs the seat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-256016</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 22:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-256016</guid>
		<description>big sigh of relief for Geraint Davies. He&#039;s survived &amp; now will enjoy first-time incumbency next time around, if he does a good job. He got the benefit of it in 2001 in Croydon Central, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>big sigh of relief for Geraint Davies. He&#8217;s survived &amp; now will enjoy first-time incumbency next time around, if he does a good job. He got the benefit of it in 2001 in Croydon Central, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert P. Williams</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-255208</link>
		<dc:creator>robert P. Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 14:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-255208</guid>
		<description>Good luck everybody...


... except the BNP.. ... you suck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck everybody&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; except the BNP.. &#8230; you suck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-254954</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 02:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-254954</guid>
		<description>LD GAIN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LD GAIN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hywel</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-254940</link>
		<dc:creator>Hywel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 01:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-254940</guid>
		<description>sneaky lib gain</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sneaky lib gain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy JS</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/swanseawest/comment-page-4/#comment-254925</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 00:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=577#comment-254925</guid>
		<description>Labour majority - 250.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour majority &#8211; 250.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

