<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherwood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: myth11</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-3/#comment-283108</link>
		<dc:creator>myth11</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-283108</guid>
		<description>on the new wards based on the last local elections i have the labs on 14091 and cons on 13162 there however were 5 wards where tories did not stand and one where labour did not stand which makes it harder to say would win on new wards . i think lab win by 3000 to 4000 if there was an election today however i think the tories will try and get ravenhead and newstead wards (from new nottingham north) moved into this seat in exchange for st marys and killsick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on the new wards based on the last local elections i have the labs on 14091 and cons on 13162 there however were 5 wards where tories did not stand and one where labour did not stand which makes it harder to say would win on new wards . i think lab win by 3000 to 4000 if there was an election today however i think the tories will try and get ravenhead and newstead wards (from new nottingham north) moved into this seat in exchange for st marys and killsick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-3/#comment-268651</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-268651</guid>
		<description>What were the districts and wards of this seat until 1997?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What were the districts and wards of this seat until 1997?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-3/#comment-261482</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-261482</guid>
		<description>&#039;1955-1974 Nottingham North&#039; [Hucknall]

If this was the case, shouldn&#039;t the seat maybe have had a different name during this period as evidently it covered territory outside Nottingham itself? Rushcliffe had rather sprawling boundaries as well until about 1974.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8217;1955-1974 Nottingham North&#8217; [Hucknall]</p>
<p>If this was the case, shouldn&#8217;t the seat maybe have had a different name during this period as evidently it covered territory outside Nottingham itself? Rushcliffe had rather sprawling boundaries as well until about 1974.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-3/#comment-256003</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 22:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-256003</guid>
		<description>Pete right, me wrong. You should do it for a living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete right, me wrong. You should do it for a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-3/#comment-255862</link>
		<dc:creator>John D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 16:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-255862</guid>
		<description>Whilst &#039;easier&#039; seats didn&#039;t fall, this one did.
Though it&#039;s only a 214 vote majority for Mark Spencer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst &#8216;easier&#8217; seats didn&#8217;t fall, this one did.<br />
Though it&#8217;s only a 214 vote majority for Mark Spencer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-3/#comment-254701</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 20:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-254701</guid>
		<description>Demographically this is probably trending Conservative, but I think the swing they need is still a bit high. LAB HOLD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Demographically this is probably trending Conservative, but I think the swing they need is still a bit high. LAB HOLD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-2/#comment-248647</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-248647</guid>
		<description>Con maj 500</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Con maj 500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neily</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-2/#comment-247129</link>
		<dc:creator>Neily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 18:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-247129</guid>
		<description>Lab Hold


Maj 1400</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lab Hold</p>
<p>Maj 1400</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Bennett</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-2/#comment-245320</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 13:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-245320</guid>
		<description>Lab Hold= 2,000 maj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lab Hold= 2,000 maj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: margot parker</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/sherwood/comment-page-2/#comment-240992</link>
		<dc:creator>margot parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=198#comment-240992</guid>
		<description>Please update Margot Parker UKIP candidate for Sherwood profile to the following.

Margot Parker ( UKIP) Born Grantham. Educated KGGS. Trade Association Spokesperson.Consultant EU/UK Legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please update Margot Parker UKIP candidate for Sherwood profile to the following.</p>
<p>Margot Parker ( UKIP) Born Grantham. Educated KGGS. Trade Association Spokesperson.Consultant EU/UK Legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

