The UKPollingReport election guide for 2010 has now been archived and all comments will shortly be closed. The new Election Guide for the 2015 election is now online at http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide. The old site is archived at the UK Web Archive.
.

Salisbury

2010 Results:
Conservative: 23859 (49.21%)
Labour: 3690 (7.61%)
Liberal Democrat: 17893 (36.91%)
BNP: 765 (1.58%)
UKIP: 1392 (2.87%)
Green: 506 (1.04%)
Independent: 376 (0.78%)
Majority: 5966 (12.3%)

Notional 2005 Results:
Conservative: 21695 (47.3%)
Liberal Democrat: 12403 (27%)
Labour: 8406 (18.3%)
Other: 3360 (7.3%)
Majority: 9292 (20.3%)

Actual 2005 result
Conservative: 25961 (47.8%)
Labour: 9457 (17.4%)
Liberal Democrat: 14819 (27.3%)
Green: 1555 (2.9%)
UKIP: 2290 (4.2%)
Other: 240 (0.4%)
Majority: 11142 (20.5%)

2001 Result
Conservative: 24527 (46.6%)
Labour: 9199 (17.5%)
Liberal Democrat: 15824 (30.1%)
UKIP: 1958 (3.7%)
Green: 1095 (2.1%)
Majority: 8703 (16.5%)

1997 Result
Conservative: 25012 (42.9%)
Labour: 10242 (17.6%)
Liberal Democrat: 18736 (32.2%)
Other: 4249 (7.3%)
Majority: 6276 (10.8%)

Boundary changes:

Profile:

portraitCurrent MP: John Glen (Conservative) Educated at King Edward School, Bath and Oxford University. Strategy consultant and former director of the Conservative research department. Contested Plymouth Devonport 2001.

2010 election candidates:
portraitJohn Glen (Conservative) Educated at King Edward School, Bath and Oxford University. Strategy consultant and former director of the Conservative research department. Contested Plymouth Devonport 2001.
portraitTom Gann (Labour) Born Odstock. Educated at Bishop Wordsworth School and Warwick University. English teacher.
portraitNick Radford (Liberal Democrat) Works for a renewable energy company.
portraitNick Startin (Green)
portraitFrances Howard (UKIP) Teacher. Contested Salisbury 2005
portraitSean Witheridge (BNP)
portraitJohn Holme (Independent)
portraitKing Arthur (Independent)

2001 Census Demographics

Total 2001 Population: 87369
Male: 48.3%
Female: 51.7%
Under 18: 21.3%
Over 60: 24%
Born outside UK: 6.4%
White: 98.6%
Asian: 0.3%
Mixed: 0.6%
Other: 0.3%
Christian: 77.6%
Full time students: 2%
Graduates 16-74: 22.6%
No Qualifications 16-74: 24.2%
Owner-Occupied: 69.5%
Social Housing: 15.9% (Council: 11.9%, Housing Ass.: 4%)
Privately Rented: 9.7%
Homes without central heating and/or private bathroom: 6.1%

NB - The constituency guide is now archived and is no longer being updated. The new guide is at http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide

116 Responses to “Salisbury”

1 2 3
  1. He was the Senator from Ohio from 1974 to 1999.

  2. Yes indeed he was – I’d forgotten that! Of course, every US state has two senators, so he was one of them.

  3. and he ran for President too, but failed to gain the Democrat nomination. He was generally regarded as on the conservative wing of the party.

  4. A disappointingly small Tory majority, although it’s interesting to note that it wasn’t actually especially large in the ’80 / early ’90s either.

    In fact, the majority in 2001 was larger than in ’83 and ’92, and the 2005 majority was slightly larger than the ’87 one.

    Of course the reason for this was the split in the opposition vote from ’97-’05, but now it’s once again moved primarily behind the Libs.

    John Glen can comfort himself with the thought that there isn’t much more of a Labour vote left for the Lib Dems to squeeze, and that the Conservative vote share did at least increase (although it’s disappointing that it didn’t quite reach 50%).

    Anyway, for the next general election I’m more concerned about Tewkesbury than this seat.

  5. “Of course the reason for this was the split in the opposition vote from ’97-’05, but now it’s once again moved primarily behind the Libs.”

    Which is surely why this seat is safer than it looks on paper. At the next election, the support will be moving away from the Libs and behind Labour.

    So long as Labour remain strong in seats like this, the Tories can continue to hold them.

  6. ‘Which is surely why this seat is safer than it looks on paper.’

    This seat is pretty safe for the Tories anyway

    In 92 the Tories had a majority over the Lib Dems almost identicle to that in Winchester and yet whilst they took Winchester, they didn’t even come close here

    Maybe they had a weak candidate as right-winger Robert Key never struck me as a particularly formiddable opponent – although he was obviously popular or rather, more popular than John Glen whose majority has been halved

    but I agree that this is a lot safer for the Tories than it currently looks

    Would not the swing make it one of the worst resukts for the Tories in 2010

  7. “He even oposed the Good Friday Agreement when he was a shadow Northern Ireland spokesman.”

    To be fair there were some hard things to swallow as part of that agreement – such as setting murderers free.

  8. ‘To be fair there were some hard things to swallow as part of that agreement – such as setting murderers free.’

    That’s true John – and assuming your a Unionist I very much hope you are referring to the murderers on the loyalist side as well as the IRA

    I’m all for reconcilliation and with hindsight I don’t think anyone could argue that the Good Friday Agreement hasn’t been worth it – but I do wonder how necessary freeing people who had willfully murdered others was

  9. Yes indeed. A murderer is a murderer.

  10. Tim – I used to have you on pre-moderation because I couldn’t trust you not to tour around seats putting up comments about how personally dispicable you found the Conservative MP. You seemed to have got it out of your system so I took you off of moderation.

    Please don’t start doing it again or I’ll have to go back to hand moderating all your posts.

  11. It wouldn’t be so bad if Tim’s criticisms were accurate and if he treated all parties equally. The fact that he doesn’t just makes his criticisms look like Lib Dem partisan froth.

    Robert Key certainly wasn’t particularly right-wing on most issues. For example, he was one of the few Tories to vote for an equal age of consent in 1994, and he was chair of the all-party group on preventing AIDS.

    He was completely loyal to John Major on Europe.

  12. I’m not going to keep replying to them if they’re about that sort of thing
    because I’m just encouraging more (as he pretty much admitted on the Witham thread).

    (Tim does make good and informative posts aswell when he wants to,
    which I do want to reply to).

    I haven’t got out at Salisbury for many years, but used to stop off there on family holidays,
    and go through more recently on the way to Lyme Regis for sea rowing.

    This seat certainly seemed to suffer a swing to the Lib Dems perhaps as a result of the upsurge in the campaign or Labour tactical voting,
    but now the Tories are closer to 50% than 40%, they should be ok.

  13. This seat will be radically different at the next election….

  14. Looking at the result here I’m a bit surprised that the LDs have managed to stay in contention, after their failure in 1997.

  15. They managed to stay in contention because of a decent candidate and the rural vote switching during council elections. This gave them the activists on the ground.

    However in the current reviews this seat is undersized so I expect more of the hinterland to come through in the next 10-15 years before the mooted development to the north of the City at Old Sarum may even things out.

    Nick Radford has written to the executive stating that he has no intention of standing again so a new LD candidate will have to be found.

  16. What have been the boundary changes to this constituency since 1918?

1 2 3