<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Salford and Eccles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.Hemmelig</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-287574</link>
		<dc:creator>H.Hemmelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-287574</guid>
		<description>Blears would make a good mayor of Salford.

It&#039;s not like she&#039;s going to get anywhere at Westminster now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blears would make a good mayor of Salford.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not like she&#8217;s going to get anywhere at Westminster now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran W</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-287572</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-287572</guid>
		<description>Notice that the referendum on Salford having an elected mayor resulted in a yes vote, but on a turnout if just 18%. Why on earth didn&#039;t they have the vote in May in the same day as the local elections, as Manchester, Sheffield and others plan to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that the referendum on Salford having an elected mayor resulted in a yes vote, but on a turnout if just 18%. Why on earth didn&#8217;t they have the vote in May in the same day as the local elections, as Manchester, Sheffield and others plan to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Bennett</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-284432</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-284432</guid>
		<description>&quot;Hazel has thrown herself behind the “Save My Seat” campaign...sorry &quot;Save Salford&quot; campaign&quot;

One of the more surprising outcome of the boundary proposals then :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hazel has thrown herself behind the “Save My Seat” campaign&#8230;sorry &#8220;Save Salford&#8221; campaign&#8221;</p>
<p>One of the more surprising outcome of the boundary proposals then <img src='http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doktorbuk</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-284425</link>
		<dc:creator>doktorbuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-284425</guid>
		<description>Absolutely - though there is different between all three parties we all have Salford &quot;saved&quot;.  The controversy with us is how we&#039;ve attached Irwell to Stretford; with the Tories is how they&#039;re considering splitting Old Trafford.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely &#8211; though there is different between all three parties we all have Salford &#8220;saved&#8221;.  The controversy with us is how we&#8217;ve attached Irwell to Stretford; with the Tories is how they&#8217;re considering splitting Old Trafford.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-284423</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-284423</guid>
		<description>Its good to see some cross -party agreement against some of the whackier proposals.  Same thing with the City of London and Islington which all parties argued against at the hearing in London this monday.  There must be a very good chance that in these cases the initial proposals will be binned, but of course it does depend on there being workable alternatives</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its good to see some cross -party agreement against some of the whackier proposals.  Same thing with the City of London and Islington which all parties argued against at the hearing in London this monday.  There must be a very good chance that in these cases the initial proposals will be binned, but of course it does depend on there being workable alternatives</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: doktorbuk</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-284422</link>
		<dc:creator>doktorbuk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 19:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-284422</guid>
		<description>Hazel has thrown herself behind the &quot;Save Salford&quot; campaign, and even found the time to thank (and it seemed very genuine) both Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties for coming up with counter-proposals to the bizarre BCE plan which sees Manchester gobble Salford up without so much as a mention in the name.

&quot;Manchester Central&quot; indeed....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hazel has thrown herself behind the &#8220;Save Salford&#8221; campaign, and even found the time to thank (and it seemed very genuine) both Conservative and Liberal Democrat parties for coming up with counter-proposals to the bizarre BCE plan which sees Manchester gobble Salford up without so much as a mention in the name.</p>
<p>&#8220;Manchester Central&#8221; indeed&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancs Observer</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-283670</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancs Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 19:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-283670</guid>
		<description>Interesting that Blears, Balls &amp; Burnham all now admit that immigration rose too much under Labour. The BNP vote was high in their 3 seats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that Blears, Balls &amp; Burnham all now admit that immigration rose too much under Labour. The BNP vote was high in their 3 seats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-270407</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 08:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-270407</guid>
		<description>Boundaries of the old Eccles constituency:

1885-1918: The civil parishes of Barton-upon-Irwell, Clifton, Flixton, Urmston, and Worsley, and part of the parish of Pendlebury.

1918-83: The Municipal Borough of Eccles and the Urban District of Swinton and Pendlebury.

1983-97: The Salford City Council wards of Barton, Eccles, Pendlebury, Swinton North, Swinton South, Weaste and Seedley, and Winton.

1997-2010: The Salford City Council wards of Barton, Cadishead, Eccles, Irlam, Pendlebury, Swinton North, Swinton South, and Winton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boundaries of the old Eccles constituency:</p>
<p>1885-1918: The civil parishes of Barton-upon-Irwell, Clifton, Flixton, Urmston, and Worsley, and part of the parish of Pendlebury.</p>
<p>1918-83: The Municipal Borough of Eccles and the Urban District of Swinton and Pendlebury.</p>
<p>1983-97: The Salford City Council wards of Barton, Eccles, Pendlebury, Swinton North, Swinton South, Weaste and Seedley, and Winton.</p>
<p>1997-2010: The Salford City Council wards of Barton, Cadishead, Eccles, Irlam, Pendlebury, Swinton North, Swinton South, and Winton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-270382</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 21:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-270382</guid>
		<description>In Eccles from 1885 to 2010</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Eccles from 1885 to 2010</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/salfordandeccles/comment-page-5/#comment-270381</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 20:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=92#comment-270381</guid>
		<description>Which seats has Pendlebury been in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which seats has Pendlebury been in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

