<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luton South</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalek</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-283797</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 19:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-283797</guid>
		<description>Has she really aged 20 years or was this in order that the jury feel sorry for her?

The change in her was as astounding as Gary Glitter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has she really aged 20 years or was this in order that the jury feel sorry for her?</p>
<p>The change in her was as astounding as Gary Glitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancs Observer</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-282647</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancs Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-282647</guid>
		<description>Margaret Moran has been charged with 21 offences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margaret Moran has been charged with 21 offences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-281774</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 21:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-281774</guid>
		<description>Luton town centre and present day Farley ward were I think in Luton East until 1983 and this seat since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luton town centre and present day Farley ward were I think in Luton East until 1983 and this seat since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy JS</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-269432</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-269432</guid>
		<description>Gavin Shuker bears a slight, though not very strong, resemblance to Ed Miliband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gavin Shuker bears a slight, though not very strong, resemblance to Ed Miliband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Foley</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-261416</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-261416</guid>
		<description>Barnaby, 
Presumably that would tip the seat decisively in the direction of the Tories.  Mind you, the only way I can see of avoiding that is for Luton and Dunstable to be divided up into two constituencies (see .../blog/archives/2753/), and Dunstable is very bad territory for the Labour Party, too. 

It looks to me like Labour will only really have a chance of one MP in Luton, unless there is a landslide.  

Further North, in Bedford, even on the best case for Labour, changes are likely to make the constituency harder to win for Labour, adding, I think, Turvey where Lab got 9% and Wootton where Lab only got 4% at the last council elections (although the latter was because of LD squeeze, and the LDs got 46%, a reasonable proportion of which Lab would hope to get in a General Election).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barnaby,<br />
Presumably that would tip the seat decisively in the direction of the Tories.  Mind you, the only way I can see of avoiding that is for Luton and Dunstable to be divided up into two constituencies (see &#8230;/blog/archives/2753/), and Dunstable is very bad territory for the Labour Party, too. </p>
<p>It looks to me like Labour will only really have a chance of one MP in Luton, unless there is a landslide.  </p>
<p>Further North, in Bedford, even on the best case for Labour, changes are likely to make the constituency harder to win for Labour, adding, I think, Turvey where Lab got 9% and Wootton where Lab only got 4% at the last council elections (although the latter was because of LD squeeze, and the LDs got 46%, a reasonable proportion of which Lab would hope to get in a General Election).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-261407</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-261407</guid>
		<description>Luton South &amp; Harpenden would be a particularly polarised seat! Harpenden is very wealthy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luton South &amp; Harpenden would be a particularly polarised seat! Harpenden is very wealthy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Foley</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-261404</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-261404</guid>
		<description>LutonTown:

Take a look at ht tp://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

A downside: the figures appear to be from relatively early in the year: it looks like voters who registered in the run-up to the GE are not included (and neither are proposed new boundaries for Central Beds &amp; Bedford Borough) 

BTW  There is also further discussion of possible alternatives to the Luton South and Harpenden at ht tp://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2753/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LutonTown:</p>
<p>Take a look at ht tp://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm</p>
<p>A downside: the figures appear to be from relatively early in the year: it looks like voters who registered in the run-up to the GE are not included (and neither are proposed new boundaries for Central Beds &amp; Bedford Borough) </p>
<p>BTW  There is also further discussion of possible alternatives to the Luton South and Harpenden at ht tp://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2753/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Foley</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-261403</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-261403</guid>
		<description>LutonTown:

Take a look at http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm

A downside: the figures appear to be from relatively early in the year: it looks like voters who registered in the run-up to the GE are not included (and neither are proposed new boundaries for Central Beds &amp; Bedford Borough) 

BTW  There is also further discussion of possible alternatives to the Luton South and Harpenden at http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2753/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LutonTown:</p>
<p>Take a look at <a href="http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.boundarycommissionforengland.org.uk/electoral-figures/electoral-figures.htm</a></p>
<p>A downside: the figures appear to be from relatively early in the year: it looks like voters who registered in the run-up to the GE are not included (and neither are proposed new boundaries for Central Beds &amp; Bedford Borough) </p>
<p>BTW  There is also further discussion of possible alternatives to the Luton South and Harpenden at <a href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2753/" rel="nofollow">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2753/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lutontown</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-261356</link>
		<dc:creator>Lutontown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-261356</guid>
		<description>Ben where do you get data on constiuency composition and ward size?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben where do you get data on constiuency composition and ward size?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Foley</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lutonsouth/comment-page-8/#comment-261277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=284#comment-261277</guid>
		<description>On the blog part of this site (…/blog/archives/2753?cp=5) I have posted on what I think the impact of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill would be on Bedfordshire.

It looks like Luton isn’t big enough for 2 constituencies, while Bedford Borough and Central Beds together will be allocated 4 (much as at present).  Luton will, I think have to take in some voters from Hertfordshire somehow, and the requirement to be within +or- 5% of the UK quota size will, mean boundary changes.  I anticipate that Luton North will take Dallow Ward, or Biscot Ward (perhaps with High Town).  Luton South would then extend into Hertfordshire to the extent of 25,000 voters or so - most obviously to take in Harpenden: the remainder of Luton South and Harpenden together would be a suitable size constituency, with a certain amount of linking countryside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the blog part of this site (…/blog/archives/2753?cp=5) I have posted on what I think the impact of the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill would be on Bedfordshire.</p>
<p>It looks like Luton isn’t big enough for 2 constituencies, while Bedford Borough and Central Beds together will be allocated 4 (much as at present).  Luton will, I think have to take in some voters from Hertfordshire somehow, and the requirement to be within +or- 5% of the UK quota size will, mean boundary changes.  I anticipate that Luton North will take Dallow Ward, or Biscot Ward (perhaps with High Town).  Luton South would then extend into Hertfordshire to the extent of 25,000 voters or so &#8211; most obviously to take in Harpenden: the remainder of Luton South and Harpenden together would be a suitable size constituency, with a certain amount of linking countryside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

