<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lewisham Deptford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-286581</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 01:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-286581</guid>
		<description>It should be left to their own conscience.  Being a member of the Labour party is not always incompatible with support of the monarchy and the bells and baubles that go with it.  Many of the strongest monarchists and unionists in this country are Labour voters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be left to their own conscience.  Being a member of the Labour party is not always incompatible with support of the monarchy and the bells and baubles that go with it.  Many of the strongest monarchists and unionists in this country are Labour voters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-286576</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 18:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-286576</guid>
		<description>A highly specious argument. Being in favour of unilateral nuclear disarmament doesn&#039;t equate to surrender to the Soviet Union or anywhere else, nor was or is Ruddock a sympathizer with that country&#039;s policies. It&#039;s an emotive phrase which you are at liberty to use if you want but which doesn&#039;t bear comparison ro reality. Personally though I don&#039;t think Labour MPs should accept gongs like this (you will remember Anne Begg accepted a damehood previously and Alan Meale a knighthood).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A highly specious argument. Being in favour of unilateral nuclear disarmament doesn&#8217;t equate to surrender to the Soviet Union or anywhere else, nor was or is Ruddock a sympathizer with that country&#8217;s policies. It&#8217;s an emotive phrase which you are at liberty to use if you want but which doesn&#8217;t bear comparison ro reality. Personally though I don&#8217;t think Labour MPs should accept gongs like this (you will remember Anne Begg accepted a damehood previously and Alan Meale a knighthood).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-286573</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 16:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-286573</guid>
		<description>More specifically I thought it was Joan Ruddock&#039;s policy not so long ago for this country to surrender to the Soviet Union so doubly hypocritical for her to accept such an award and also confusing as to why such a fellow traveller should be awarded it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More specifically I thought it was Joan Ruddock&#8217;s policy not so long ago for this country to surrender to the Soviet Union so doubly hypocritical for her to accept such an award and also confusing as to why such a fellow traveller should be awarded it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H.Hemmelig</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-286570</link>
		<dc:creator>H.Hemmelig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-286570</guid>
		<description>I thought it was Labour policy not to accept political honours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was Labour policy not to accept political honours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-286569</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-286569</guid>
		<description>Joan Ruddock is made a Dame in the New Year&#039;s Honours List</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joan Ruddock is made a Dame in the New Year&#8217;s Honours List</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-284404</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 01:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-284404</guid>
		<description>&quot;Did the Lewisham North constituency include Deptford?&quot;

What Barnaby said, and of course Deptford was a separate borough from Lewisham before 1965 (ie when Lewisham North was created). Lewisham North did however include a significant part of this constituency as Ladywell and Lewisham central were in that seat - roughly 40% of the electorate.  When the new Lewisham borough seats were created for 1974, Deptford expanded into territory from the old Lewisham borough taking Ladywell from North and Crofton Park from West. The expansion continued in 1983 with the addition of Blyth Hill and in 2010 with Lewisham Central.  When Lewisham East was created it consisted of most of Lewisham North together with about half of Lewisham South (the other hald of South joining with most of West).  Now as Catford and Rushey Green have been added, Lewisham East is more the succesor to Lewisham South than to Lewisham North as four of its seven wards are from that seat and they constitute about 80% of the old Lewisham South.  Lewisham South was carved entirely out of Lewisham East in 1950, so in many ways it is a return to that old setup</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Did the Lewisham North constituency include Deptford?&#8221;</p>
<p>What Barnaby said, and of course Deptford was a separate borough from Lewisham before 1965 (ie when Lewisham North was created). Lewisham North did however include a significant part of this constituency as Ladywell and Lewisham central were in that seat &#8211; roughly 40% of the electorate.  When the new Lewisham borough seats were created for 1974, Deptford expanded into territory from the old Lewisham borough taking Ladywell from North and Crofton Park from West. The expansion continued in 1983 with the addition of Blyth Hill and in 2010 with Lewisham Central.  When Lewisham East was created it consisted of most of Lewisham North together with about half of Lewisham South (the other hald of South joining with most of West).  Now as Catford and Rushey Green have been added, Lewisham East is more the succesor to Lewisham South than to Lewisham North as four of its seven wards are from that seat and they constitute about 80% of the old Lewisham South.  Lewisham South was carved entirely out of Lewisham East in 1950, so in many ways it is a return to that old setup</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-284402</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-284402</guid>
		<description>John Silkin (as opposed to his more right-wing brother Sam, Attorney-General in the Callagan government) was in the Tribune Group and was noted for his Euro-scepticism (though the term hadn&#039;t been coined yet). He was the &quot;soft left&quot; candidate for the Party deputy leadership in 1981 against Denis Healey, Tony Benn &amp; Peter Shore, and received the support of Neil Kinnock and other Tribune groupies (Joe Ashton was another) who weren&#039;t prepared to back Benn. He also got the vote of the TGWU delegation who transferred to Benn on his elimination, nearly but not quite causing Healey&#039;s defeat. So it perhaps isn&#039;t entirely true to say he was on the Right, though he never seemed to have much in common with the Benn/Skinner/Jo Richardson harder leftwingers. He got on apparently exceptionally well with Willie Whitelaw when they were the opposing Chief Whips in the 60s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Silkin (as opposed to his more right-wing brother Sam, Attorney-General in the Callagan government) was in the Tribune Group and was noted for his Euro-scepticism (though the term hadn&#8217;t been coined yet). He was the &#8220;soft left&#8221; candidate for the Party deputy leadership in 1981 against Denis Healey, Tony Benn &amp; Peter Shore, and received the support of Neil Kinnock and other Tribune groupies (Joe Ashton was another) who weren&#8217;t prepared to back Benn. He also got the vote of the TGWU delegation who transferred to Benn on his elimination, nearly but not quite causing Healey&#8217;s defeat. So it perhaps isn&#8217;t entirely true to say he was on the Right, though he never seemed to have much in common with the Benn/Skinner/Jo Richardson harder leftwingers. He got on apparently exceptionally well with Willie Whitelaw when they were the opposing Chief Whips in the 60s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James B</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-284395</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 22:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-284395</guid>
		<description>I do remember John Silkin, Labour MP for Deptford, and a former Minister, who sadly died early just before the 1987 election.

I was aware of him in my first 8  years of being politically aware.
He seemed to be a rather nice, somewhat urbane character, probably on the right of the Labour Party.

He was putting up a brave and quite humerous effort on the 1983 program - felt somewhat sorry for him - actually being interviewed alongside Jim Prior who said that although Waveney/Lowestoft had been a marginal seat , the Labour vote just wasn&#039;t turning out on the estates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do remember John Silkin, Labour MP for Deptford, and a former Minister, who sadly died early just before the 1987 election.</p>
<p>I was aware of him in my first 8  years of being politically aware.<br />
He seemed to be a rather nice, somewhat urbane character, probably on the right of the Labour Party.</p>
<p>He was putting up a brave and quite humerous effort on the 1983 program &#8211; felt somewhat sorry for him &#8211; actually being interviewed alongside Jim Prior who said that although Waveney/Lowestoft had been a marginal seat , the Labour vote just wasn&#8217;t turning out on the estates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-269250</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-269250</guid>
		<description>No Deptford was always a separate seat, and has been safe Labour since WWII.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No Deptford was always a separate seat, and has been safe Labour since WWII.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy JS</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/lewishamdeptford/comment-page-3/#comment-269233</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy JS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 16:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=491#comment-269233</guid>
		<description>Did the Lewisham North constituency include Deptford?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the Lewisham North constituency include Deptford?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

