<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Houghton and Sunderland South</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:29:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Votedave</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-266099</link>
		<dc:creator>Votedave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-266099</guid>
		<description>Harry - do buy the book if you can (as mentioned on the Nottingham North thread).  
I got mine on Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry &#8211; do buy the book if you can (as mentioned on the Nottingham North thread).<br />
I got mine on Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Votedave</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-266098</link>
		<dc:creator>Votedave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:10:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-266098</guid>
		<description>Sunderland North: Castletown, Central, Colliery, Fulwell, Pallion, St. Peter&#039;s, South Hylton, Southwick and Town End Farm

Sunderland South: Grindon, Hendon, Ryhope, St. Chad&#039;s, St. Michael&#039;s, Silksworth, Thorney Close and Thornholme

Gateshead East: Chowdene, Deckham, Felling, High Fell, Leam, Low Fell, Pelaw and Heworth, Saltwell and Wrekendyke

Houghton and Washington: Eppleton, Hetton, Houghton, Shiney Row, Washington East, Washington North, Washington South and Washington West.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sunderland North: Castletown, Central, Colliery, Fulwell, Pallion, St. Peter&#8217;s, South Hylton, Southwick and Town End Farm</p>
<p>Sunderland South: Grindon, Hendon, Ryhope, St. Chad&#8217;s, St. Michael&#8217;s, Silksworth, Thorney Close and Thornholme</p>
<p>Gateshead East: Chowdene, Deckham, Felling, High Fell, Leam, Low Fell, Pelaw and Heworth, Saltwell and Wrekendyke</p>
<p>Houghton and Washington: Eppleton, Hetton, Houghton, Shiney Row, Washington East, Washington North, Washington South and Washington West.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Porter</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-266087</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-266087</guid>
		<description>What were the 1983-97 wards of:

Sunderland North
Sunderland South
Gateshead East
Houghton and Washington</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What were the 1983-97 wards of:</p>
<p>Sunderland North<br />
Sunderland South<br />
Gateshead East<br />
Houghton and Washington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: outsider</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-257109</link>
		<dc:creator>outsider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 10:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-257109</guid>
		<description>Well the first couple of declarations certainly threw the cat am,ongst the pigeons with the studio pundits and swing &quot;experts&quot; - I think it&#039;d be uncharitable to say they were clueless to extrapolate from Washington and Houghton&#039;s results, but it took something of a pro-Conservative leap of faith to declare that the swings here (about 9% and in Washington, 11%) were cut and dried when in fact there were extremely high votes for none of the three main parties which totally skewed the swings, something which was totally ignored, on the BBC at least.  The picture in Sunderland Central mirrored the national swing more accurately, which, being a more marginal seat, the pundits ought to have hung on for before they got a tad overexcited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the first couple of declarations certainly threw the cat am,ongst the pigeons with the studio pundits and swing &#8220;experts&#8221; &#8211; I think it&#8217;d be uncharitable to say they were clueless to extrapolate from Washington and Houghton&#8217;s results, but it took something of a pro-Conservative leap of faith to declare that the swings here (about 9% and in Washington, 11%) were cut and dried when in fact there were extremely high votes for none of the three main parties which totally skewed the swings, something which was totally ignored, on the BBC at least.  The picture in Sunderland Central mirrored the national swing more accurately, which, being a more marginal seat, the pundits ought to have hung on for before they got a tad overexcited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daddy Cool</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-255578</link>
		<dc:creator>Daddy Cool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-255578</guid>
		<description>I said Colin Wakefield would do well! Maybe not as well as he&#039;d hoped, but to finish fourth behind tthe major parties is a staggering achievement. The Independent councillors in the Copt Hill and Houghton wards also just missed out by around 200 votes each. If it hadn&#039;t been a general election on the same night, they may well have both been elected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said Colin Wakefield would do well! Maybe not as well as he&#8217;d hoped, but to finish fourth behind tthe major parties is a staggering achievement. The Independent councillors in the Copt Hill and Houghton wards also just missed out by around 200 votes each. If it hadn&#8217;t been a general election on the same night, they may well have both been elected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-255336</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 22:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-255336</guid>
		<description>OK please note: Others 14.4% - that is staggeringly high. BNP and Colin Wakefield have held their deposits!
I think this is skewing the swing figure slightly. Labour well down - but Tories not much up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK please note: Others 14.4% &#8211; that is staggeringly high. BNP and Colin Wakefield have held their deposits!<br />
I think this is skewing the swing figure slightly. Labour well down &#8211; but Tories not much up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul D</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-255334</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 22:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-255334</guid>
		<description>8.4% would mean the exit polls out a bit and Con overall majority. We shall see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8.4% would mean the exit polls out a bit and Con overall majority. We shall see</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHS</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-255332</link>
		<dc:creator>WHS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 21:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-255332</guid>
		<description>First seat declared - 8.4% swing to Tories on the notionals. Lib Dem vote down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First seat declared &#8211; 8.4% swing to Tories on the notionals. Lib Dem vote down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-255268</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-255268</guid>
		<description>Considering the fact that it&#039;s highly likely Bridget will be the first Labour MP in the new parliament, does that mean she&#039;ll be the leader of the Labour party until the next Labour MP has won their seat? lol!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering the fact that it&#8217;s highly likely Bridget will be the first Labour MP in the new parliament, does that mean she&#8217;ll be the leader of the Labour party until the next Labour MP has won their seat? lol!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/houghtonandsunderlandsouth/comment-page-5/#comment-254130</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=8#comment-254130</guid>
		<description>LAB HOLD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LAB HOLD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

