<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Henley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Foley</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-281404</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 22:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-281404</guid>
		<description>Henley in Arden, presumably, not Henley on Thames, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henley in Arden, presumably, not Henley on Thames, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancs Observer</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-281395</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancs Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-281395</guid>
		<description>Shaun - I&#039;ve just double checked and these Henley Ind Cons are actually based in Stratford-upon-Avon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shaun &#8211; I&#8217;ve just double checked and these Henley Ind Cons are actually based in Stratford-upon-Avon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancs Observer</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-281393</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancs Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-281393</guid>
		<description>Actually, 9 as Aberdeen has 2 rival Tory Parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, 9 as Aberdeen has 2 rival Tory Parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancs Observer</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-281392</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancs Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-281392</guid>
		<description>I think the ElComm allows it where a group splits as its not for them to judge who is the true or biggest Party. eg Wigan Ind Cons used wigancons website too as I assume one of their cllrs regd the domain name. Lpool Labour exist in Lpool. But you&#039;re right, there does appear to be 8 Ind Cons Parties but no Ind LD. Maybe they join the Liberal Party?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the ElComm allows it where a group splits as its not for them to judge who is the true or biggest Party. eg Wigan Ind Cons used wigancons website too as I assume one of their cllrs regd the domain name. Lpool Labour exist in Lpool. But you&#8217;re right, there does appear to be 8 Ind Cons Parties but no Ind LD. Maybe they join the Liberal Party?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun Bennett</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-281390</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun Bennett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-281390</guid>
		<description>Its probably a minority of disafectees from within the party.
But I thought the purpose of registration was to prevent groups from doing this?

Why do we never hear of any Independent Lib Dems on the ballot paper or Independent Labour?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its probably a minority of disafectees from within the party.<br />
But I thought the purpose of registration was to prevent groups from doing this?</p>
<p>Why do we never hear of any Independent Lib Dems on the ballot paper or Independent Labour?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancs Observer</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-281386</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancs Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-281386</guid>
		<description>Henley Ind Cons have been registered with the ElComm. Have the Tory group split?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henley Ind Cons have been registered with the ElComm. Have the Tory group split?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard j</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-258777</link>
		<dc:creator>richard j</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 12:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-258777</guid>
		<description>There was a district council by-election last Thursday in Crowmarsh, South Oxfordshire. The Lib Dems gained the seat from the conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a district council by-election last Thursday in Crowmarsh, South Oxfordshire. The Lib Dems gained the seat from the conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-254113</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 16:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-254113</guid>
		<description>CON HOLD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CON HOLD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Whitehead</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-248425</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Whitehead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 14:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-248425</guid>
		<description>Con maj 17,500</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Con maj 17,500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neily</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/henley/comment-page-10/#comment-247602</link>
		<dc:creator>Neily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 10:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=457#comment-247602</guid>
		<description>Con Hold


Maj 16400</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Con Hold</p>
<p>Maj 16400</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

