<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dundee East</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description>Just another UKPollingReport site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 02:28:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Cairns</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-2/#comment-284203</link>
		<dc:creator>A Cairns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 10:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-284203</guid>
		<description>The boundary commission has proposed a Dundee East and the Glens seat (taking in all of Kirriemuir ward).

Can&#039;t say I like the look of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The boundary commission has proposed a Dundee East and the Glens seat (taking in all of Kirriemuir ward).</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t say I like the look of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esgrad</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-2/#comment-272753</link>
		<dc:creator>Esgrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 00:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-272753</guid>
		<description>Predictions for May 2011 Scottish Parliament election

SNP - 12000
Lab - 9000
Con - 3000
LD  - 2000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Predictions for May 2011 Scottish Parliament election</p>
<p>SNP &#8211; 12000<br />
Lab &#8211; 9000<br />
Con &#8211; 3000<br />
LD  &#8211; 2000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brown</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-2/#comment-269412</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-269412</guid>
		<description>Dundee City East 2011

SNP 13300 
Lab 12200 
Con 3900
LD 1500</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dundee City East 2011</p>
<p>SNP 13300<br />
Lab 12200<br />
Con 3900<br />
LD 1500</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalek</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-2/#comment-265991</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-265991</guid>
		<description>Yes....the boundary changes which have transformed Perth into Perthshire South &amp; Kinross have made this seat a lesser prospect for Labour.

Simply, East Perth was much more Labour than Kinross-shire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230;.the boundary changes which have transformed Perth into Perthshire South &amp; Kinross have made this seat a lesser prospect for Labour.</p>
<p>Simply, East Perth was much more Labour than Kinross-shire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calum W</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-2/#comment-265988</link>
		<dc:creator>Calum W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-265988</guid>
		<description>Shouldn&#039;t it be easier for Labour to win the Western Isles than Perthshire South and Kinross in general? I understand that locally it appears to have moved quite safely to the SNP and is less likely to respond to national swings but it was Labour up to 2005 and Labour are the only real challengers, while in PS+K coming a decent third is a realistic target for Labour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shouldn&#8217;t it be easier for Labour to win the Western Isles than Perthshire South and Kinross in general? I understand that locally it appears to have moved quite safely to the SNP and is less likely to respond to national swings but it was Labour up to 2005 and Labour are the only real challengers, while in PS+K coming a decent third is a realistic target for Labour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brown</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-2/#comment-265979</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2010 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-265979</guid>
		<description>Basically it&#039;s a hell of a lot easier for Labour to get 60 seats than 65.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically it&#8217;s a hell of a lot easier for Labour to get 60 seats than 65.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brown</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-1/#comment-265893</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 21:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-265893</guid>
		<description>actually for the 65th seat not a list seat in the northeast
lets say Perthshire South and Kinross instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually for the 65th seat not a list seat in the northeast<br />
lets say Perthshire South and Kinross instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brown</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-1/#comment-265892</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 20:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-265892</guid>
		<description>@Dalek again this is purely theoretical but I reckon the way labour is most likely to get a majority (i.e. 65 seats) is by winning 59/73 FPTP seats

i.e. all the seats except 

Aberdeenshire East
Aberdeenshire West
Angus North
Angus South
Argyll &amp; Bute
Berwickshire, Roxburgh &amp; Ettrick
Caithness, Sutherland &amp; Ross
Fife North east
Perthshire North
Perthshire South/Kinross
Orkney
Shetland
Skye Lochaber and Badenoch
Western Isles

+ 5 list seats in the highlands
and possibly 1 list seat in North east Scotland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dalek again this is purely theoretical but I reckon the way labour is most likely to get a majority (i.e. 65 seats) is by winning 59/73 FPTP seats</p>
<p>i.e. all the seats except </p>
<p>Aberdeenshire East<br />
Aberdeenshire West<br />
Angus North<br />
Angus South<br />
Argyll &amp; Bute<br />
Berwickshire, Roxburgh &amp; Ettrick<br />
Caithness, Sutherland &amp; Ross<br />
Fife North east<br />
Perthshire North<br />
Perthshire South/Kinross<br />
Orkney<br />
Shetland<br />
Skye Lochaber and Badenoch<br />
Western Isles</p>
<p>+ 5 list seats in the highlands<br />
and possibly 1 list seat in North east Scotland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Brown</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-1/#comment-265800</link>
		<dc:creator>A Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-265800</guid>
		<description>It might be possible if they got around 1.1 -1.2m votes  and their vote was distributed correctly.

Personally Lab+Grn =65 would be my favoured result.
A bit of a stretch maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be possible if they got around 1.1 -1.2m votes  and their vote was distributed correctly.</p>
<p>Personally Lab+Grn =65 would be my favoured result.<br />
A bit of a stretch maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalek</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/dundeeeast/comment-page-1/#comment-265797</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 22:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=596#comment-265797</guid>
		<description>In the extreem event of Labour polling in the high forties next May, is it possible that they could win a majority of Holyrood seats?

If they won a huge majority of FPTP constituency seats (which there are many more of), surely they would not be enough regional list seats to prevent an overall majority?

If Labour were to win 60 of the 129 seats, 9 seats short, there surely would be a minority Labour government.   A Lib Lab pact is almost as unlikely as a Con Lab pact.

Will the Scottish Government revert to being called the Scottish Executive?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the extreem event of Labour polling in the high forties next May, is it possible that they could win a majority of Holyrood seats?</p>
<p>If they won a huge majority of FPTP constituency seats (which there are many more of), surely they would not be enough regional list seats to prevent an overall majority?</p>
<p>If Labour were to win 60 of the 129 seats, 9 seats short, there surely would be a minority Labour government.   A Lib Lab pact is almost as unlikely as a Con Lab pact.</p>
<p>Will the Scottish Government revert to being called the Scottish Executive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

