The UKPollingReport election guide for 2010 has now been archived and all comments will shortly be closed. The new Election Guide for the 2015 election is now online at http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide. The old site is archived at the UK Web Archive.
.

Dumfries and Galloway

2010 Results:
Conservative: 16501 (31.63%)
Labour: 23950 (45.9%)
Liberal Democrat: 4608 (8.83%)
SNP: 6419 (12.3%)
UKIP: 695 (1.33%)
Majority: 7449 (14.27%)

2005 Results:
Labour: 20924 (41.1%)
Conservative: 18002 (35.4%)
SNP: 6182 (12.1%)
Liberal Democrat: 4259 (8.4%)
Other: 1524 (3%)
Majority: 2922 (5.7%)

Boundary changes prior to 2005 election: Name of seat changed from Galloway and Upper Nithsdale.

2001 Result
Conservative: 12222 (34%)
Labour: 7258 (20.2%)
Liberal Democrat: 3698 (10.3%)
SNP: 12148 (33.8%)
Other: 588 (1.6%)
Majority: 74 (0.2%)

1997 Result
Conservative: 12825 (30.5%)
Labour: 6861 (16.3%)
Liberal Democrat: 2700 (6.4%)
SNP: 18449 (43.9%)
Referendum: 428 (1%)
Other: 755 (1.8%)
Majority: 5624 (13.4%)

No Boundary Changes:

Profile:

portraitCurrent MP: Russell Brown(Labour) (more information at They work for you)

2010 election candidates:
portraitPeter Duncan (Conservative) MP for Galloway and Upper Nithsdale 2001-2005
portraitRussell Brown(Labour) (more information at They work for you)
portraitRichard Brodie (Liberal Democrat)
portraitAndrew Wood (SNP)
portraitBill Wright (UKIP)

2001 Census Demographics

Total 2001 Population: 95724
Male: 48.1%
Female: 51.9%
Under 18: 22.4%
Over 60: 25.4%
Born outside UK: 2.6%
White: 99.3%
Asian: 0.2%
Mixed: 0.2%
Other: 0.2%
Christian: 69.5%
Graduates 16-74: 17%
No Qualifications 16-74: 39.1%
Owner-Occupied: 64.1%
Social Housing: 21.1% (Council: 17.5%, Housing Ass.: 3.7%)
Privately Rented: 9.8%
Homes without central heating and/or private bathroom: 6.9%

NB - The constituency guide is now archived and is no longer being updated. The new guide is at http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide

529 Responses to “Dumfries and Galloway”

1 9 10 11
  1. Labour gained a seat from the Conservatives in Abbey ward yesterday, although the Conservatives won most first preference votes.
    The Labour candidate won on transfers as the system used for local authority by-elections in Scotland is effectively AV – a system that was roundly rejected in a recent referendum including by 70% of voters in this constituency

  2. Is this ward in Dumfries burgh itself, or in another town?

  3. “the system used for local authority by-elections in Scotland is effectively AV – a system that was roundly rejected in a recent referendum including by 70% of voters in this constituency”

    But it was rejected for a different purpose – one size doesn’t necessarily fit all. If there was a referendum on how by-election for local authorities in Scotland should be run, I’d guess turnout would be close to zero, and there’s no guarantee that voters wouldn’t stick with this status quo.

  4. “Is this ward in Dumfries burgh itself, or in another town?”

    It includes a small part of Dumfries town but is mostly rural and includes small towns like Dalbeattie. I think the winning Labour candidate had previously represented the urban part of the seat (Troqueer) on the old FPTP seats before 2007

  5. Thanks Pete.

  6. There was in fact AFAIR a past Labour parliamentary candidate for Dumfries called James McAughtrie, so perhaps the winning candidate is related to him.

  7. Even after boundary changes this will surely still be a Lab. hold.

  8. If a bit of fresh blood stood in this area instead of Peter Duncan, would the Tories be in with a reasonable chance?

    (just ignoring the hundred and one unknown variables like boundaries that we don’t know anything about, of course – just asking generally re the area)

  9. You mean that Alex Fergusson could give Russell Brown a run for his money?

    After all, he and John Scott were strong enough to resist the SNP tsunami!

  10. Surprised nobody has yet mentioned the new Scottish boundary commission proposals. Has anybody seen them?

    Seems to me that the proposed Galloway and Carrick seat, losing Dumfries and stretching into Ayrshire risks creating a seat here that is even better for the Tories than the present Dumfreisshire seat.

    I suspect the proposed Kyle and Cumnock seat based upon Ayr, Troon and Prestwick would also produce a second potential Tory MP in Scotland.

    What is going on? Surely the commission won’t allow that to go ahead???

  11. I think Labour would have ‘won’ Galloway and Carrick by about 5% last year but it is clearly a good bet for the tories with Labour losing a moderate amount of support to the SNP.

  12. Really? That surprises me. i’d have thought the Labur lead in Dumfries would be a lot bigger than in the areas coming in from Ayrshire. Particularly since Labour never stood a chance in the old Galloway seat before it gained Dumfries.

    Having said that, perhaps the name change is confusing. If this seat still includes large parts of Dumfries itself (despite the neighbouring seat now being renamed Dumfries-implying the whole town) then that would greatly assist Labour.

    I await Anthony’s notional results with interest.

  13. I actually hope the proposals go ahead. I mean, as Shaun says a Galloway and Carrick seat is definitely winnable for the Tories or whatever centre right party may replace them. The commission have, I think, been pretty fair to us – a first time for everything I guess!

    Only thing is I dunno what’s going to happen to David Mundell…his hard-won DCT seat is gone and the resurrected Dumfries seat is almost certainly going to be won by Labour, even though, in my mind, it is fairly similar to the pre-1983 boundaries when it was of course Conservative. He could battle it out there, but he may also be in with a chance of candidacy in the Galloway/Carrick seat.

    Interesting times.

  14. I’ve done a bit of detailed number crunching based on polling districts. Dumfries and Kyle & Cumnock both look good for Labour, but Galloway & Carrick would have been a knife-edge result (though still Labour):

    Dumfries
    Lab 21,386 (46.1)
    Con 15,891 (34.3)
    LD 4,863 (10.5)
    SNP 4,234 (9.1)
    Lab maj 5,495 (11.8)

    Galloway and Carrick
    Lab 19,574 (37.5)
    Con 19,275 (36.9)
    SNP 8,363 (16.0)
    LD 5,012 (9.6)
    Lab maj 299 (0.6)

    Kyle and Cumnock
    Lab 23,835 (48.8)
    Con 11,444 (23.5)
    SNP 8,581 (17.6)
    LD 4,918 (10.1)
    Lab maj 12,391 (25.4)

    The Tories’ strength in Troon and Prestwick is cancelled out by Labour strength in Ayr North and overwhelming strength in Cumnock and Doon Valley.

    More generally, there are some good things in the Commission’s proposals, but also quite a few bad things. Their number one aim has been to avoid grouping too many councils together, rather than to avoid splitting wards or aiming at electoral parity (the latter isn’t necessary, of course, though I’d argue that it’s desirable). Much will depend on whether their particular groupings of councils will remain intact or be overturned.

  15. I’m a bit surprised by how safe for Labour Kyle and Cumnock looks. I know that Labour are strong in Cumnock and the Doon Valley but it really looks a bit like the old Ayr seat which the Tories would most likely have won in 2005 and 2010. I’d expect the Labour lead to be quite a bit smaller than the 12,000 estimated.

    The Galloway estimate looks more reasonable but I do still think that Labour won’t actually have much chance of really winning that actual seat without Dumfries in it. Before Dumfries was added, labour were always third behind the SNP here, and I expect that arrangement will return.

  16. Yes Shaun a seat including Cumnock is always going to terribly hard for the Tories. Cumnock & neighbouring Dalmellington are amongst the most Labour towns anywhere in Scotland. Galloway & Carrick is more interesting and if the Tories do as well as they did in 2010, and Russell Brown isn’t the candidate (the latter seems to me to be near-certain) the Tories would indeed have a good chance. A small swing to Labour however would probably enable Labour to hold on even in Brown’s absence.

  17. Interesting figures there – so notional result for new seats would be Tory = 0 in Scotland. Of course next time round the Lib Dem situation could be a help in Berwickshire and Alastair Darling might decide to retire from Edinburgh South West… .

  18. Shaun, Troon and Prestwick are actually quite marginal towns. Back in 1987 and 1992, when Ayr was more or less a dead heat, the Tories’ lead in Troon wasn’t that great, and Labour were almost certainly ahead in Prestwick. In the mid-1990s Labour won all the wards in both towns in local elections. The Tories have recovered since then in local elections; but given the size of the Labour majority in Ayrshire Central last year they are unlikely to have had much of a lead in either town. Indeed, my own calculations suggest that Labour would have been ahead in both towns: by about 5% in Troon, and by about 9% in Prestwick. Labour would also have been substantially ahead in rural Kyle (20%) and north Ayr (27%). The most Tory part of Ayr, Ayr West ward, isn’t in Kyle and Carrick; that, together with the presence of Cumnock and Doon Valley, explains why Kyle & Cumnock would be a fairly safe Labour seat. (Indeed, the Tories would actually have come third on the votes-cast-on-the-day box counts in this seat in the 2007 Holyrood elections.)

    Re Galloway & Carrick: remember that over 40% of that seat *isn’t* from Dumfries & Galloway, but from seats where Labour is the main anti-Tory party. Also, remember that we don’t know exactly how partisan SNP supporters in Galloway & Upper Nithsdale were, and how many of them were Labour supporters voting tactically. I suspect the ‘natural’ figure of Labour supporters in Galloway is higher than most G&UN results would suggest, and lower than the D&G results would suggest – in other words, Lab/SNP tactical voting works both ways.

  19. Russell Brown will most likely stand in Dumfries where he will almost certainly win, meaning that Mundell would most likely stand in Galloway and Carrick where he really ought to win – it contains much of the Galloway and W. Dumfries seat and a very Tory-inclined part of the Ayr seat, both of which remained Tory earlier this year. Although if Peter Duncan stands again, who knows? Mundell is popular locally however and so I guess there’s an outside chance he could fight Brown for Dumfries and win – I’m actually surprised that Aidan’s notional majority for that seat is so small – 6,000 when it was nearly 10,000 in 2001. The Tories could well win in Berwickshire as well/instead in 2015 – I think Michael Moore is dull as dishwater quite frankly. A Scottish Tory wipeout could thus be avoided perhaps.

  20. I would not be surprised if David Mundell stood in Galloway & Carrick (even although it contains nothing of his current constituency. Of the three constituencies that annex parts of DCT the closest the Conservative come is over 5000 behind in Dumfries).

    Russell Brown increased the Labour majority in D & G from a notional few hundred to nearly 3000 in 2005 and then over 7000 in 2010.

    Brown has a hugh personal vote and his decision to fight D & G as opposed to DCT may have resulted in Peter Duncan’s defeat and David Mundells victory in 2005.

    Russell Brown did particuarly well in Galloway in 2010, he had to in order to win by over 7000, as he had already reached saturation point in urban Dumfries. Labour have not enjoyed this level of support in Galloway & Upper Nithsdale in 2007 or Galloway & West Dumfries in 2011, so it has to be personal.

    Carrick not only includes rural South Ayrshire (and seaside towns like Girvan) but also the Southern Ayr suburbs. The hoplessness of Ayr, Carrick & Doon Valley may have mutted the Conservative vote in 2010.
    Many of the Tories could be motivated to vote in a winnable seat. This may be the reason why there was so much distance between the 2001 notional result for DCT (5000 – 6000 Labour majority) and the actual 2005 result, and also highlights Russell Brown’s personal vote.

    Russell Browns absence could result much of the left of centre vote in Galloway returning to the SNP (as they did before 2005 and as they still do in Holyrood).

  21. There were numerous seats such as Perth and Edinburgh Pentlands which in 2005 the Conservatives would probably have gained had they not been abolished. That, sadly, might have sparked the end of any hope we had in re-gaining a momentum in Scotland.
    I support the proposal that the Scottish Conservatives should re-form into its own breakaway party, as its London-centric image does not seem to be helping at all.

  22. “I would not be surprised if David Mundell stood in Galloway & Carrick (even although it contains nothing of his current constituency. Of the three constituencies that annex parts of DCT the closest the Conservative come is over 5000 behind in Dumfries).”

    From a Tory point of view that would be the better option. However, he could be accused of ‘chicken running’ and would be up against an incumbent Labour MP, likely to be Sandra Osborne. That said if he runs in Dumfries then he could lose against Russell Brown. If I were the Tories I would argue for keeping the status quo in the boundary review appeals process.

  23. Since the Galloway, Carrick and Ayr S seat looks pretty likely to go ahead, I’d be grateful if Aidan Thomson could try and construct how the S Ayrshire parts of that seat would have voted in 2010.

  24. I’m not sure why the Tories should be obsessed with ensuring that David Mundell gets the nomination for the most winnable seat in Scotland. I’ve never been that impressed with his performace to be honest, and hes certainly no better than many other Tory candidates north of the border who were not afforded the accident of election following the boudnary changes of 2005.

    I’d rather Peter Duncan came back than Mundell continuing to be the party’s sole MP. Duncan really didn’t deserve to be defeated after a single term and would undoubtedly still be there if the pre 2005 boundaries were still in place.

  25. I agree Shaun that it would be a mistake to move Mundell here.

    The tories could either choose Peter Duncan again or go for one of the S Ayrshire councillors.

  26. A Cairns: I make the figures for the South Ayrshire bit of Galloway and Carrick as follows:
    Lab 8007
    Con 7435
    SNP 3802
    LD 2161

    For the record, I make the D&G part of the seat:
    Con 11840
    Lab 11566
    SNP 4560
    LD 2851

    This makes an overall total of:
    Lab 19573
    Con 19275
    SNP 8362
    LD 5012

    Obviously this is different from Anthony’s result, which gives the Conservatives a narrow lead, but when a result is potentially as close as this one is a lot can come down to which figures are used, methodologies, etc. It’s clear that this is a seat which could have gone either way.

    I think you’re right that this seat will probably be created, and I think it’s a shame that Ayr has to be split between seats once again. There was a perfectly good Ayr seat that could have been created out of the whole of Ayr, Troon, Prestwick, Kyle ward, and Coylton, possibly extending as far south as Minishant (depending on numbers), but the consequence of that would have been a Galloway and South Ayrshire seat that included parts of three local authorities (D&G, East Ayrshire and South Ayrshire) which went against the Commission’s own rules (though, interestingly, not against the statutory ones).

  27. Many thanks, interesting you have Labour slightly ahead in the S Ayrshire section.

  28. The Tories were well ahead in Ayr West, but I’ve got Labour ahead in the part of Ayr East that comes into G&C (there are some council estates in this area, in Belmont and Kincaidston), and they are also comfortably ahead in Carrick.

  29. Dumfries and Galloway Council 2012 Prediction

    Con 17 (-1)
    SNP 14 (+4)
    Lab 14 (-)
    Ind 2 (-)
    LD 0 (-3)

1 9 10 11