The UKPollingReport election guide for 2010 has now been archived and all comments will shortly be closed. The new Election Guide for the 2015 election is now online at http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide. The old site is archived at the UK Web Archive.
.

Beaconsfield

2010 Results:
Conservative: 32053 (61.06%)
Labour: 6135 (11.69%)
Liberal Democrat: 10271 (19.57%)
UKIP: 2597 (4.95%)
Green: 768 (1.46%)
Independent: 191 (0.36%)
Others: 475 (0.9%)
Majority: 21782 (41.49%)

Notional 2005 Results:
Conservative: 24981 (54.4%)
Liberal Democrat: 9770 (21.3%)
Labour: 8954 (19.5%)
Other: 2207 (4.8%)
Majority: 15210 (33.1%)

Actual 2005 result
Conservative: 24126 (55.4%)
Labour: 8422 (19.4%)
Liberal Democrat: 8873 (20.4%)
UKIP: 2102 (4.8%)
Majority: 15253 (35%)

2001 Result
Conservative: 20233 (50.4%)
Labour: 9168 (22.8%)
Liberal Democrat: 9117 (22.7%)
UKIP: 1626 (4.1%)
Majority: 11065 (27.6%)

1997 Result
Conservative: 24709 (49.2%)
Labour: 10063 (20%)
Liberal Democrat: 10722 (21.4%)
Referendum: 2197 (4.4%)
Other: 2510 (5%)
Majority: 13987 (27.9%)

Boundary changes:

Profile:

portraitCurrent MP: Dominic Grieve(Conservative) Briefly shadow Home Secretary following the resignation from Parliament of David Davis, shadow Secretary of State of Justice since 2009 (more information at They work for you)

2010 election candidates:
portraitDominic Grieve(Conservative) Briefly shadow Home Secretary following the resignation from Parliament of David Davis, shadow Secretary of State of Justice since 2009 (more information at They work for you)
portraitJeremy Miles (Labour)
portraitJohn Edwards (Liberal Democrat)
portraitJem Bailey (Green)
portraitDelphine Gray-Fisk (UKIP)
portraitAndrew Cowen (A vote against MP expense abuse)
portraitQuentin Baron (Independent)

2001 Census Demographics

Total 2001 Population: 93411
Male: 48.4%
Female: 51.6%
Under 18: 21.7%
Over 60: 23.3%
Born outside UK: 10.8%
White: 94.5%
Black: 0.5%
Asian: 3.1%
Mixed: 1.2%
Other: 0.8%
Christian: 75.5%
Hindu: 0.9%
Muslim: 1%
Sikh: 1.1%
Full time students: 2.1%
Graduates 16-74: 28.7%
No Qualifications 16-74: 20.5%
Owner-Occupied: 78.3%
Social Housing: 12.2% (Council: 3.9%, Housing Ass.: 8.3%)
Privately Rented: 6.2%
Homes without central heating and/or private bathroom: 2.5%

NB - The constituency guide is now archived and is no longer being updated. The new guide is at http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide

107 Responses to “Beaconsfield”

1 2 3
  1. I would have thought that the issue of HS2 would lead to a further decrease in membership figures for this constituency and others affected by this.

  2. “It is an interesting subject and chart.
    Looking at the Beaconsfield chart, the really big drop happened between mid 1992 and around 1995.”

    But that is ancient history, and easily explained by the political catastrophes of the Major government.

    The most worrying development for the Tories is the declines in membership in 2008 and 2009 – years when they had leads of up to 20% in the polls, and the Labour government was reeling from the worst economic crisis since the depression. If the Tories couldn’t even keep their membership up in those years, what’s it going to look like after 5 difficult years in government?

  3. One of the main problems is that anyone under the age of 50 who turns up at a Tory party gathering of any kind is liable to feel out of place on account of the advanced age of existing party members. A simple point, but true all the same.

  4. The parties no longer seek members. They now seem to prefer wealthy donors, which is bad for democracy.
    Generally parties rebuild their membership in opposition. Strong membership helps with fund raising and organisation.
    Equally there are very few opportunities to hear polictical speakers any more. My son is studying politics A-level – but none of the safe Conservative seats near us advertise speaker events, so there is no chance for him to hear MP’s live. The other parties don’t exist at all.
    Strong parties support local activity and provide a gene pool for local councillors.

  5. I am a Conservative voter, but no longer a member. When I last joined I was told I was going to get a visit from some local party members. This put me off because I wanted to keep my political allegiance quiet from other members of my household and neighbours. I wonder if more people would join if people could hold membership under their own terms, ie. just paying the membership fee only, not receiving letters etc.
    In fact I never did get the visit, maybe because there was a slight error in my address.

  6. “I wonder if more people would join if people could hold membership under their own terms”

    If you join the party nationally, Swanarcadian, I believe you CAN specify no communication from your local association (or at least you could in the past).

    When I was membership officer for the Stoke Association, we had a number of members who we didn’t know who were down as no communication.

    You will still get begging letters from CCHQ from time to time however.

  7. The main reason people don’t join political parties is a lack of time to make the commitment. Nothing to do with ‘apathy’ etc.

1 2 3