<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bassetlaw</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:44:41 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Stidwill</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-235541</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Stidwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 12:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-235541</guid>
		<description>Bassetlaw is now counting on election night. Previously it was down as a Friday count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bassetlaw is now counting on election night. Previously it was down as a Friday count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peterelectionfollower</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-235351</link>
		<dc:creator>peterelectionfollower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-235351</guid>
		<description>I agree with Barnaby on this seat.

Although Boundary Changes favour Tories, Labour performance last time should insulate them.

Labour hold majority 2000.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Barnaby on this seat.</p>
<p>Although Boundary Changes favour Tories, Labour performance last time should insulate them.</p>
<p>Labour hold majority 2000.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-232490</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:21:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-232490</guid>
		<description>&quot;as well as against corrupt colleagues&quot;

He has a lot to say about corrupt MPs unless they are Labour. In which case he is strangely silent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;as well as against corrupt colleagues&#8221;</p>
<p>He has a lot to say about corrupt MPs unless they are Labour. In which case he is strangely silent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lancs Observer</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-232489</link>
		<dc:creator>Lancs Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 07:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-232489</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say Mann will hold on, but maybe only by his personal vote. He&#039;s very vocal campaining against lawyers retaining fees for miners&#039; compensation claims, as well as against corrupt colleagues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say Mann will hold on, but maybe only by his personal vote. He&#8217;s very vocal campaining against lawyers retaining fees for miners&#8217; compensation claims, as well as against corrupt colleagues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James B</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-222342</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 17:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-222342</guid>
		<description>Well  this is interesting - it&#039;s a slightly safer Labour seat than Erewash but at times this looks the likelier upset.
but
I think those odds are about right and Labour will hold on most likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well  this is interesting &#8211; it&#8217;s a slightly safer Labour seat than Erewash but at times this looks the likelier upset.<br />
but<br />
I think those odds are about right and Labour will hold on most likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby JL Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-222334</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby JL Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-222334</guid>
		<description>On the face of it, this would be a surprising Conservative gain, but the Tories have been doing well locally of late. Labour will hope that their above-average performance in 2005 will just about insulate them from disaster here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the face of it, this would be a surprising Conservative gain, but the Tories have been doing well locally of late. Labour will hope that their above-average performance in 2005 will just about insulate them from disaster here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shadsy</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-222329</link>
		<dc:creator>shadsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 13:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-222329</guid>
		<description>Ladbrokes:

Labour 5/6
Conservatives 5/6
Liberal Democrats 100/1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ladbrokes:</p>
<p>Labour 5/6<br />
Conservatives 5/6<br />
Liberal Democrats 100/1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-218532</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-218532</guid>
		<description>The Lib Dems have reselected David Dobbie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Lib Dems have reselected David Dobbie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rotten Luck Willie</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-218444</link>
		<dc:creator>Rotten Luck Willie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-218444</guid>
		<description>Someone has been taking an interest in John Mann&#039;s activities - www.mannisms.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone has been taking an interest in John Mann&#8217;s activities &#8211; <a href="http://www.mannisms.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mannisms.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James B</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/bassetlaw/comment-page-3#comment-217970</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/?p=190#comment-217970</guid>
		<description>sorry - Pete has of course provided the result - had a look up the thread.
But anyway - that&#039;s my view now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry &#8211; Pete has of course provided the result &#8211; had a look up the thread.<br />
But anyway &#8211; that&#8217;s my view now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
