.

London Mayoral Election

The Mayor of London is elected using a supplementary vote system by residents of Greater London. The position was created in 2000, the first directly elected mayor in the UK. Voters have first and second preference votes, with the second preferences of votes for all but the top two candidates being re-allocated after the first round of counting.

Boris Johnson has served as Mayor of London since 2008, having defeated the first holder of the post Ken Livingstone, who had held the position since in 2000. Livingstone had initially ben elected as an Independent, having failed to secure the Labour nomination and gone back on an undertaking not to stand against the official Labour candidate. He was subsequently re-admitted to the Labour party and secured a second term as the official Labour candidate.

portraitCurrent Mayor: Boris Johnson (Conservative) born 1964, New York, USA. Son of Stanley Johnson, former MEP and Conservative candidate in Teignbridge in 2005. Educated at Eton and Oxford, a contemporary of David Cameron. Author, television presenter and journalist. Worked as a columnist on the Daily Telegraph and as editor of The Spectator. Instantly recognisable by his dishevelled appearance, blond thatch of hair and bumbling public-schoolboy mannerisms, he has become a media celebrity through appearances on Have I Got News For You and tendency to make gaffes. As shadow minister for arts under Michael Howard he survived being made to publically apologise to Liverpool over an editoral in the Spectator that accused them of wallowing in victimhood, but not the revelation (that he had previously described as “an inverted pyramid of piffle”) that he had been conducting an affair with Petronella Wyatt. Appointed shadow minister for higher education in 2005-2007. Mayor of London since 2008. Contested Clywd South in 1997. MP for Henley 2001 to 2008.

Past Results

2008 Mayoral ElectionClick for results and candidates
2004 Mayoral ElectionClick for results and candidates
2000 Mayoral ElectionClick for results and candidates
NB - Candidates lists are provisional, based on candidates declared before the campaign. They will be updated to reflect the final list of candidates as soon as possible following the close of nominations.

321 Responses to “London Mayor”

1 3 4 5 6 7
  1. Steve Norris would make an excellent Mayor.

  2. If anyone has any news on turnout at their local polling station, etc, I’d be interested to hear it.

  3. I will mail later….sometimes turnout figures get a bit excitable…. queues etc….and then we find it’s still around 40 pc.

  4. London Lite says turnout above 50% by early predictions.

  5. Someone I know in London has just told me they voted for Ken. :-(

    A turnout as high as that would be fantastic, but I’ll believe it when I see it.

  6. Lukw, that would be very positive news if that was the case. When I went to cast my vote this morning the polling station in Harrow it was a little busy, certainly not as high as it could be. The again it was round 11:20am :P

    Oh and I have to mention that I voted for Boris Johnson, with Sian Berry as my second preference. I also vote Conservative on the other two ballot papers.

  7. I’ll be surprised if turnout is above 50% – if it is it probably isn’t good news for Boris Johnson

  8. Was busy when I voted in Shepherd’s Bush this afternoon, and it was raining quite hard! Shep Bush is not known for high turnouts either!

  9. I voted late, in Hampton Wick in Twickenham (Richmond Borough).
    I live in quite a high turnout area, but I have to say, I have not seen that many people voting in a non General Election for a very long time.

  10. David Dimbleby has just said that there have been reports from Bexley of turnout higher than the last general election. That would be amazing if true.

  11. He said they came from Phil Hendren, aka useless Tory blogger ‘Dizzy’ from the amazingly misnamed ‘Dizzy Thinks’.

  12. turnout high also in inner London wards as well.

    I think the BNP won’t get a seat now, their vote will be swamped by the high turnout

  13. David – I was out for a bit in Bexley yesterday afternoon and my feeling of the turnout, in terms of the enthusiasm to actually go out to vote on the doorstep and the proportion of people we got hold of who said they already had then it felt more like GE levels of turnout than local election levels. Still, very anecdotal and I guess we’ll see later on.

  14. According to the sky coverage very early this morning the turnout accross London was very significant, both in Labour and Conservative heartlands.

    As Alex Ferguson would say: It’s squeeky bum time’

  15. turnout high also in inner London wards as well.

    I think the BNP won’t get a seat now, their vote will be swamped by the high turnout

    I think it was the high turnout which prevented the BNP from getting a second seat.

  16. “In 2004 Ken Livingstone ‘won’ 49 of the (new) parliamentary constituencies after 2nd votes were redistributed and Steve Norris won 24. The only constituency which was ‘won’ by a different candidate on first preferences to the final result was Bermondsey & Old Southwark which was carried by Simon Hughes on the first ballot but by Livingstone after Hughes and the others had been eliminated.
    Norris carried all the constituencies the Tories won (notionally) in 2005 with the exception of Putney and Wimbledon (also Ealing Central & Acton which is Conservative on AW’s figures but Labour on T&R’s). In addition to this he carried three of the LD seats – Carshalton & Wallington, Richmond Park and Sutton & Cheam, and two Labour seats – Harrow East and Hendon (also Finchley & Golders Green which is also disputed between AW and T&W). The last thre are undoubtedly a reflection of Livingstone’s lack of appeal to Jewish voters.

    There are a further eleven constituencies which were carried by Livingstone by a smaller percentage margin than he enjoyed in London as a whole and which represent therefore the first line of defence in the battleground for May – in other words the seats Boris Johnson needs to carry in order to close the gap with Livingstone.
    These are in order of marginality:
    Croydon C, Westminster N, Putney, Kingston & Surbiton, Battersea, Dagenham & Rainham, Twickenham, Wimbledon, Eltham, Ealing C & Acton, Brent N.

    Beyond that there are a further 10 constituencies which would fall on the basis of the most recent polls, in other words if the positions of Labour and Conservative were effectively reversed with the latter winning by a margin of 55/45.
    The first of these and therefore the seat which would need to switch in order for Johnson to win is Ealing north – appropriate given its long history as a bellwether. After that we have Hammersmith, Poplar & Limehouse, Erith & Thamesmead, Brentford & Isleworth, Edmonton, Harrow W, Feltham & Heston, Hayes & Harlington, Tooting.

    Some of those towards the end of that list sound rather unlikely but are in any case not necessary for Johnson to win.

    The position of Dagenham & Rainham as higher up the ‘target list’ than Twickenham and Wimbledon is a testament to the very different patterns of the relationship between class and voting behaviour which have developed in London Mayoral elections compared with General elections, although the pattern is shifting in the latter also.

    In terms of boroughs there are five which gave a very narrow lead to Livingstone in 2004 and must surely switch allegiance this time – Croydon, Harrow, Kingston, Redbridge and Richmond. In order to win Johnson will need to carry Wandsworth and possibly Merton and if he is doing as well as current polls suggest he can carry Hounslow and Ealing and possibly (but I should have thought unlikely) Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest.

    April 2nd, 2008 at 10:27 pm “

  17. To revisit this with the results now in, with postal votes reallocated Boris Johnson ‘won’ 41 Parliamentary constituencies; Ken Livingstone ‘won’ 32

    Of the eleven constituencies I identified as the ‘first line of defence’ Boris Johnson carried ten – the single exception being Brent North.
    Of the further ten constituencies identified as marginal Boris Johnson won in seven (Ealing N, Hammersmith, Erith & Thamesmead, Brentford & Isleworth, Feltham & Heston, Hayes & Harlington and Tooting) – Livingstone won the other three (Poplar & Limehouse, Edmonton and Harrow W).

    In terms of boroughs Boris Johnson ‘gained’ Croydon, Harrow, Kingston, Redbridge, Richmond, Wandsworth, Merton as expected. Of the more longshot boroughs he also carried Hounslow but Livingstone held on in Ealing, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest as expected. The major surprise was that Boris Johnson won in Greenwich giving him 19 boroughs to 13 for Ken Livingstone.

  18. Boris also ‘gained’ the City of London

  19. Pete’s figures are superior to mine because he’s including postal votes, but just to confirm what he was saying, with my figures excluding postal votes I had Boris “winning” 40 Westminster seats and Ken 33. As I think Pete said Tooting would be the seat which changed hands as a result of postal votes since Ken only won there without postal votes by 746 votes.

    There does seem to be a minor problem with the Mayoralty votes (first preferences). If you add up all the totals in the 14 London constituency spreadsheets from LondonElects you get the following figures:

    Boris Johnson: 1,044,068
    Ken Livingstone: 894,316
    Brian Paddick: 236,752
    Total: 2,416,886

    These are slightly different from the officially declared numbers:

    Boris Johnson: 1,043,761
    Ken Livingstone:893,877
    Brian Paddick: 236,685
    Total: 2,415,958

  20. I believe they missed out the results from two wards in Merton in the initial declaration.

  21. Indeed if you look at the spreadsheet downloaded from London electes there are little red triangles next to the wards of Lavender fields and Longthornton and if you hold your mouse over that there is an explanation.

  22. Thanks very much for that explanation, Pete.

  23. Of the 624 wards in Greater London (not including the City of London), Boris beat Ken by 332 to 292, or 53.2% to 46.8%, virtually identical figures to the popular vote on second preferences.

    {In the City of London, Boris won in divisions AL and BL, with Ken winning the least populous division CL.}

    Neither Brian Paddick nor anyone else carried a single ward.

  24. Nice.
    A complete blank.

  25. Regarding Andy Stidwill’s most recent commment what does the City of London divisions actually represent?

  26. I’m not sure myself. I know there are 25 largely ceremonial wards in the City of London but since the population is only about 8,000 I suppose it’s not practical to use those in elections of this kind so they’ve divided the City into these 3 divisions. The overwhelming number of voters seem to be in the BL division, which I would therefore guess contains the Barbican area.

  27. Here are the complete figures for the results according to the 624 London wards:

    CONSTITUENCY: C – 314, Lab – 273, LD – 28, BNP – 7, Respect 2, Green – 0.

    LIST: C – 320, Lab – 292, BNP – 8, LD – 3, Green – 1.

    MAYOR: C – 332, Lab – 292, LD/Green/BNP – 0.

    The one ward the Greens managed to “win” was the Highgate ward (Camden), which they carried by 7 votes over Labour – 1,086 votes to 1,079.

  28. Did the LDs carry 28 wards in the constituency section? I’m surprised about that as they did poorly in Kingston, richmond and Sutton and only won a handful there

  29. Wards carried by the LDs in the constituency section:

    1. Bermondsey & Old Southwark: 7 – (Cathedrals, Grange, Newington, Riverside, Rotherhithe, South Bermondsey, Surrey Docks).

    2. Hornsey & Wood Green: 6 – (Alexandra, Crouch End, Fortis Green, Highgate, Hornsey, Muswell Hill).

    3. Twickenham: 6 – (Heathfield, West Twickenham, St Margarets&North Twickenham, Twickenham Riverside, Fulwell&Hampton Hill, Teddington).

    4. Carshalton & Wallington: 3 – (St Helier, Wandle Valley, The Wrythe).

    5. Kingston & Surbiton: 3 – (Grove, Norbiton, St Marks).

    6. Streatham: 2 – (Streatham Wells, St Leonard’s).

    7. Sutton & Cheam: 1 – (Sutton Central).

    The 3 wards carried by the LDs in the list section were: Cathedrals (Bermondey & Old Southwark), Alexandra and Muswell Hill (both Hornsey & Wood Green).

  30. Ray Lewis has apparently resigned this evening.
    I know very little about this – he may have done the right thing.
    However, part of my reaction – bearing in mind other work he has done – is this is rather sad.

  31. The new Conservative administration in London has announced it will review the congestion charges and has already cancelled a proposed expansion which was due to come into effect this October. I am sure this will be of greater significance to the voters than the Ray Lewis story.

  32. This is what the results of the 2012 mayoral election would be based on the recent Borough Election results . I have used the councillors elected 1st and 2nd as 1st preference and then 2nd preference results.

    1st Preference.
    Lab = 789,642 (46.92%)
    Con = 679,118 (30.35%)
    LibDem = 212,407 (12.62%)
    Green = 1,889 (0.11%)
    Total Votes Cast = 1,680,356

    2nd Preference.
    Lab = 730,314 (52.70%)
    Con = 655,451 (47.30%)
    Total Votes Cast = 1,385,765

    Grand Total.
    Lab = 1,519,956 (53.25%)
    Con = 1,334,569 (46.75%)

    Of course a Labour victory in 2012 would depend on whether or not Ken Livingstone is selected by Labour. If he isn’t, then he could either stand as an independent thus potentially spitting Labour’s vote or even winning the mayorality a la 2000.

  33. A rather bizarre methodology to say the least

  34. I suspect it is the news that Ken Livingstone and Oona King will be battling for the Labour candidacy in 2012 which has prompted new interest in this thread.

  35. Also,1st preference is actually 40.35% not 30.35%, for Tories.

  36. Andy where do your figures on wards carried come from? The Greens also won a seat in Lewisham Brockley ward and the BNP lost all their seats.
    I don’t think a general year and a mayoral year are comparable. They haven’t been in the past.
    I would say Ken has it if I were to make a prediction today. Ona King is unlikely to be selected and the vote that she could garner over Ken is only a fraction of the vote Ken can mobilise over her.

  37. I signed up for the TfL Central London Bike scheme today.
    There are lots of bike docking stations.
    It’ll be interesting to see if this changes travel patterns heavily, and how popular it is.

    I think Oona King would be a dreadful candidate in my personal view, a whining politically correct type, with limited understanding of the large complex issues which require real nouse and pragmatism to get value for money.
    However, given how well Labour did even this year in London, there’s surely a tough fight for the Tories to retain City Hall.
    But perhaps London may do something different again compared to the national trend – with a relatively better Tory performance to flatten out above average Labour ones in 2008 and 2010.

  38. I do think Oona is a nice lady personally though.

  39. James Youd:

    The ward details were available in 2008 from the London Votes official website. I don’t know how easy they are to access at the moment. Sometimes they make it difficult to find those kinds of links after a certain amount of time which is annoying.

  40. I noticed one of the bike stations outside the British Museum a few weeks ago. That must have been part of a pilot scheme of some sort. I would have had a go on one except they were all taken. There were only about 10-15 available IIRC which didn’t seem like enough. You probably have to get there at 5 in the morning to get one.

  41. The scheme is intended and priced to be used only for short, quick journeys and the British Museum is quite a major destination so there are likely to be bikes ending their trips there as well as begining. Most stands I pass (there are loads and loads) seem to have a good supply and there are also trucks that move bikes from overstretched stands to empty ones. Another interesting thing is that, at many smaller stands you can see sections of pavement where space has clearly been left for further docks to be fitted if required.

    There have been some teething troubles but ultimately I think the biggest complaints will end up being from people in the Zone 2-3 “Bike Belt” which the scheme does not yet cover. I foresee a clamour of people calling for Cycle Hire to be extended to areas like Camden, Islington and Battersea.

  42. The bike scheme is a well meaning idea, but I do worry about the safety implications of encouraging tourists to cycle around a city they don’t know well, where the roads are pretty dangerous, without helmets.

    As a Lib Dem, I ought to be applauding it. But we certainly shouldn’t rule out the possibility that the benefits (in terms of convenience as well as environmentally) don’t necessarily outweigh the safety concerns. I hope I’m wrong on this though.

  43. I’ve been using it and it’s excellent.

    But they do need to deal with pinch points,
    it can be difficult to dock your bike at Waterloo station even if you try 5 or 6 different stations.

    But I think it can be done quite easily by going round in the lorry collecting surplus bikes (and then putting them back at night).

    We have to have some patience with it as it’s very difficult do judge demand at the start, but they need to deal with this issue as it would truly be a victim of it’s success as people fear they can’t return their bikes.

    I’m sure all this data is being monitored though.

    If it really takes off further, then I guess they’ll add more stands and bikes.

  44. It’s rather like being on a scooter without a motor.

  45. SIr Norfolk – I think we need to trust it,
    the roads will get safer as more people claim the streets with it,

    Perhaps we should warn people – even more strongly – in no uncertain terms that they should wear a helmet.

  46. In central London the roads are usually at a standstill anyway so there’s minimal danger of getting hit other than by a pedestrian.

    Certainly though for various safety, environmental and health reasons we should be looking at a lot more bike/pedestrian zones in central London and excluding cars where possible. I am not anti-car, although I feel it enslaves as much as it frees us, but the more I see of congestion, noise and the genuinely dangerous air quality in Zone 1, the more I think that cars have just become inappropriate. In any other British town or city a car-free central area would not be even slightly controversial, in fact allowing motor vehicles through the main shopping street would
    often seem like a trip to the 1970s.

  47. In 1983 or 1984,
    Ken Livingstone went to the Conservative conference,
    to lobby support from Conservatives who were opposed to
    abolition of the GLC, a task which was given to Patrick Jenkin, as
    Secretary of State for the Environment.

    I read a few years ago that he spoke at a fringe meeting.
    At the back of the room, there was a lot of comotion going on
    around the door, perhaps where people were standing,
    and there was apparently a man looking through the keyhole at what
    was going on.
    Somebody opened the door to ask if he wanted to come in
    , and a very embarrassed Patrick Jenkin ran away.

  48. Boris is standing again.

    From my point of view, I must say, it is nice to have a candidate and someone who wants to see the job through.

    But given how Labour piled up turnout even in the General Election, the Tories are going to get a strong challenge in mid-term.

  49. Boris said he will stand again, but he’s been more than a little vague on his assurances that he will see any second term through to its end.

  50. Does anyone like the story I found out above about Jenkin or is it rather irrelevant now?

1 3 4 5 6 7

Leave a Reply

NB: Before commenting please make sure you are familiar with the Comments Policy. UKPollingReport is a site for non-partisan discussion of polls.

You are not currently logged into UKPollingReport. Registration is not compulsory, but is strongly encouraged. Either login here, or register here (commenters who have previously registered on the Constituency Guide section of the site *should* be able to use their existing login)

*