<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouGov April Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:59:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Scott-Parker</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972/comment-page-1#comment-119983</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Scott-Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972#comment-119983</guid>
		<description>In response to Anthony Wells, the Plymouth analyses are not based on things like that, merely recent council by-election results, so I would have to disagree with you on the Prescott scandal affecting their analysis. However, I do think their prediction this year is pretty sound, last year I fell off my chair laughing at it so that&#039;s something at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Anthony Wells, the Plymouth analyses are not based on things like that, merely recent council by-election results, so I would have to disagree with you on the Prescott scandal affecting their analysis. However, I do think their prediction this year is pretty sound, last year I fell off my chair laughing at it so that&#8217;s something at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick O'Connor</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972/comment-page-1#comment-119714</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick O'Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972#comment-119714</guid>
		<description>Andy Stidwell,I can distinctly remember local election night 1989.
The BBC poll was stated to represent a swing of 8% from 1987-as the Tories won by 11.8% in 1987,this would have meant a Labour lead of 4%.Also,I remember the extroploation into 12 marginal seats the BBC used that night (at that stage they did not go throuhgout every seat on a computer)- the result would have been a Labour overall majority of 4,with Southampton Test,30 miles from me in Bournemouth going from Tory-Labour.
Even as an 18 year-old student,full of naive optimism,I was underwhelmed (as a Labour supporter),that the outcome would be so modest.
I wil  be extroplating this Thursday night with keen fervour,using the excellent updated boundaries/marginaols links on this site!
(As a Labourite,I feel excused to planning to having a bottle of spirits ready to steady my nerves as the inevitable Labour pounding occurs! lol )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy Stidwell,I can distinctly remember local election night 1989.<br />
The BBC poll was stated to represent a swing of 8% from 1987-as the Tories won by 11.8% in 1987,this would have meant a Labour lead of 4%.Also,I remember the extroploation into 12 marginal seats the BBC used that night (at that stage they did not go throuhgout every seat on a computer)- the result would have been a Labour overall majority of 4,with Southampton Test,30 miles from me in Bournemouth going from Tory-Labour.<br />
Even as an 18 year-old student,full of naive optimism,I was underwhelmed (as a Labour supporter),that the outcome would be so modest.<br />
I wil  be extroplating this Thursday night with keen fervour,using the excellent updated boundaries/marginaols links on this site!<br />
(As a Labourite,I feel excused to planning to having a bottle of spirits ready to steady my nerves as the inevitable Labour pounding occurs! lol )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972/comment-page-1#comment-119680</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972#comment-119680</guid>
		<description>JJB, I don&#039;t have the figures for the 1961 local elections either, but a Gallup poll was showing Tories 44.5%, Labour 40.5%, Liberals 14%.  
Labour didn&#039;t overtake the Tories until August of that year, but they still managed to narrowly win the 1964 general election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJB, I don&#8217;t have the figures for the 1961 local elections either, but a Gallup poll was showing Tories 44.5%, Labour 40.5%, Liberals 14%.<br />
Labour didn&#8217;t overtake the Tories until August of that year, but they still managed to narrowly win the 1964 general election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972/comment-page-1#comment-119660</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972#comment-119660</guid>
		<description>When considering the Plymouth analysis from last year, it&#039;s worth remembering that after R&amp;T had made their predictions Labour was suddenly embroiled in the foreign prisoner release scandal, Prescott&#039;s affair and Patricia Hewitt saying it was the best year ever for the NHS. If all those things hadn&#039;t combined together in the last fortnight of the election campaign then perhaps R&amp;T&#039;s prediction would have been more accurate. As it is, you can hardly blame them for not predicting it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When considering the Plymouth analysis from last year, it&#8217;s worth remembering that after R&#038;T had made their predictions Labour was suddenly embroiled in the foreign prisoner release scandal, Prescott&#8217;s affair and Patricia Hewitt saying it was the best year ever for the NHS. If all those things hadn&#8217;t combined together in the last fortnight of the election campaign then perhaps R&#038;T&#8217;s prediction would have been more accurate. As it is, you can hardly blame them for not predicting it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Stidwill</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972/comment-page-1#comment-119643</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Stidwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 16:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/972#comment-119643</guid>
		<description>JJB, I was referring to opinion polls, not the projected share from local elections.

The interesting thing about the 1989 opinion polls is that until May that year, the 2 main parties were fairly level; but from June onwards, the Labour party had a lead of close to 10%, which continued to be fairly large until John Major replaced Thatcher in November 1990.

Therefore, I was slightly wrong in what I said, since things started to go wrong for the previous Tory government after 10 years and 1 month, not 10 years exactly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JJB, I was referring to opinion polls, not the projected share from local elections.</p>
<p>The interesting thing about the 1989 opinion polls is that until May that year, the 2 main parties were fairly level; but from June onwards, the Labour party had a lead of close to 10%, which continued to be fairly large until John Major replaced Thatcher in November 1990.</p>
<p>Therefore, I was slightly wrong in what I said, since things started to go wrong for the previous Tory government after 10 years and 1 month, not 10 years exactly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

