The full tables for the YouGov/Sunday Times poll are now up here. On the regular leader trackers David Cameron is at minus 25 (from minus 23 last week), Ed Miliband at minus 27 (from minus 20 last week), Nick Clegg at minus 54 (from minus 52). Cameron has the best rating again, but realistically him and Miliband have much the same rating and have done for the last couple of months.

While the GDP figures this week don’t seem to have had any effect upon voting intention, their impact is visible on some of the economic questions. Economic ratings and optimism remain very low. 80% of people think the economy is currently in a bad state (including 35% who think it is in a very bad state, up from 26% last week before the GDP figures were announced). Only 25% think the government is handling the economy well. 51% of people say they personally feel worse off financially than they did a year ago and only 10% of people expect their financial position to get better over the next 12 months.

The support for a change of economic strategy continues to grow – now only 28% of people say the government should stick to their current strategy compared to 45% who would like to see growth prioritised instead. David Cameron & George Osborne’s lead over Ed Miliband and Ed Balls on who people would most trust on the economy has also fallen, now down to 3 points. 34% would trust Cameron & Osborne more, 31% Miliband and Balls more.

Asked about various changes to economic policy spending more on large infrastructure projects and cutting taxes seem to be the most popular options (and no, that isn’t necessarily contradictory! YouGov presented them both as being funded from borrowing – there was very little support for bigger cuts). People would support more spending on big infrastructure projects by 46% to 37%, the most popular option. 41% of people would support cutting taxes to encourage growth, but 43% would be opposed. There is significantly less support for reversing spending cuts, supported by 32% but opposed by 48%, or reducing spending more quickly, supported by 24% but opposed by 60%.

Support for George Osborne has continued to drop. Only 19% of people think he should remain in his role with 52% of people thinking he should be replaced. Amongst Conservative supporters only 48% think Osborne should stay, compared to 28% who think he should go and 24% who don’t know. The most popular replacement for Osborne remains Vince Cable, but this is again a largely partisan response – Labour and Liberal Democrat supporters would like Vince Cable to take over, but Conservatives would prefer Hague or Clarke.

Finally on the economy YouGov asked whether people believed the GDP figures, or the claims of some commentators that the unemployment figures suggest that the economy is actually doing better. The majority (61%) of people think the economy is as bad as the official figures suggest, only 18% of people think the employment figures are a better indicator and the economy is, in fact, doing better than the official figures suggest.

Moving onto “cash in hand”, 64% of people say they have paid a tradesman “cash in hand”, but only 26% say they have done this in the knowledge that they were intending to avoid tax. 30% of people say they have asked for a discount for paying cash-in-hand. The majority of people think that it is not wrong to pay cash-in-hand, or to ask for a discount for doing so. However, 57% of people think it is wrong to pay cash-in-hand if you know the person you are paying intends avoiding paying tax on it.

Finally on the Olympics there is growing optimism that they will be a success – 60% of people now think they will (up from 53% a week ago), with only 15% thinking they won’t be successful. People think they will improve Britain’s image abroad by 50% to 7% thinking they will damage it. The survey was, of course, done before the opening ceremony – I expect we’ll have it asked again during the Games so we can see how figures for interest and if the Games have been a success go up or down.

158 Responses to “More from YouGov/Sunday Times”

1 2 3 4
  1. ALEC.
    I am glad a smile came to your face; 100 days Indulgence from Purgartory for that.

  2. RHuckle:

    Pleased eo learn that breathing between the “a” and “bide” of abide is considered sensitive rather than crap.

    Video funny, ta. I actually laugh a lot, albeit mostly at my own quips, or my 1950’s BBC radio interview joke about the free- Czech pilot who’s interview concludes with him saying “Yes, yes – that is so. But these Fokkers were Messerschmits”.

    BOOM BOOM !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    CL1945: re prayers/hymns. Not so sure myself as we are a secular society – or perhaps multi-“faith” if religion absolutely HAS to be included. On t’other hand the tunes are absolutely great and, as an brilliant ex-choirboy, still bring tears to my eyes.

    That could be the high notes though.

  3. RHuckle,I was going to post on the curse of Cameron but you beat me to it.
    Why not just stay away and congratulate or not after the event.

  4. About the economy I read that the reason nobody in government questions the figures is that they would invite ridicule from critics accusing them of special pleading etc.for doing so, even if they were right.
    This is a strange recession in that while the fall in output was much grezater than in the 1980-81 recession it doesn’t seem to have devastated the country by anything like as much.

    Good Evening.
    i. Why cannot secular society allow liberty for public prayer?

    ii. We have an established Church.

    iii. The Monarch is defender of the catholic faith. (Title given by the Pope to Henry viiii when he attacked Luther)

    iv. Danny Boy has the’Ave’

  6. Latest YouGov/The Sun results 30th July – CON 33%, LAB 44%, LD 9%, UKIP 7%; APP -32

  7. CL1945

    Not sure where I wrote that public prayer should be not be allowed: I did question if quite so much prominence was relevant at the opening and still do.

    The fact is we are overwhelmingly an agnostic country at most. The reason religion plays such a prominent part is mainly historical and also the odd respect thing whereby “faith” in something completely unprovable is seen as somehow better in some way than committed atheism – in which one believes in facts.

1 2 3 4