<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More election stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2695/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2695</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Jackson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2695/comment-page-26#comment-652896</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2695#comment-652896</guid>
		<description>Is the Lib Dem Surge for Real (Part 4: The meltdown) 
by Renard Sexton @ 12:00 PM 

I thought this was quite an interesting blog on 538.

We have seen the Lib Dems ascend to 30s%  post first debate poll a tad over 23% in the GE and slipped lower now they have entered into coalition.

So decline not arrested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the Lib Dem Surge for Real (Part 4: The meltdown)<br />
by Renard Sexton @ 12:00 PM </p>
<p>I thought this was quite an interesting blog on 538.</p>
<p>We have seen the Lib Dems ascend to 30s%  post first debate poll a tad over 23% in the GE and slipped lower now they have entered into coalition.</p>
<p>So decline not arrested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pam  F</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2695/comment-page-26#comment-651680</link>
		<dc:creator>Pam  F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 17:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2695#comment-651680</guid>
		<description>Ah, I see th ConDems can be partisan, but polite replies are moderated. I guess we&#039;re not wanted on here then.
Oh well..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see th ConDems can be partisan, but polite replies are moderated. I guess we&#8217;re not wanted on here then.<br />
Oh well..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david p</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2695/comment-page-26#comment-651205</link>
		<dc:creator>david p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 22:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2695#comment-651205</guid>
		<description>One thing. Is it correct to talk about a swing from labour to Conservative,  given that the Labour vote declined by a lot more than the Tory vote increased?  It is more complicated than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing. Is it correct to talk about a swing from labour to Conservative,  given that the Labour vote declined by a lot more than the Tory vote increased?  It is more complicated than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James B</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2695/comment-page-26#comment-651197</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 22:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2695#comment-651197</guid>
		<description>Although part of the reason why the LDs are within 10% of winning in slightly more seats is because they lost seats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although part of the reason why the LDs are within 10% of winning in slightly more seats is because they lost seats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorsDen</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2695/comment-page-26#comment-651112</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorsDen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2695#comment-651112</guid>
		<description>1250 posts - I cannot be bothered trying to find out how many are sane.

But lets get one thing straight - making parliaments fixed term takes a huge amount of power and patronage away from the PM.  Putting in safeguards to prevent a major partner shafting its minor one seems eminently sensible to me.

And the BBC point out that the Coalition (National ?) Government have a majority of over 80.  Is it likely to lose a vote on no confidence.

Socialist whinges about &#039;dictatorships&#039; (laughable)  after their 13 years of twisting democracy is truly absurd.

But the ground is being laid by the socialists ---   they leave a huge massive deficit and an appallingly rising debt.  A huge pile of poo to clean up. They are clearly all set to rewrite history; Brown has already started by claiming how wonderful the last 13 years have been.  Get real - he has only achieved raising the national debt to an eye watering 1.4 trillion.  Now we have to pay the bill and suffer accordingly ---  bye bye all his alleged benefits foisted on us with no regard to the bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1250 posts &#8211; I cannot be bothered trying to find out how many are sane.</p>
<p>But lets get one thing straight &#8211; making parliaments fixed term takes a huge amount of power and patronage away from the PM.  Putting in safeguards to prevent a major partner shafting its minor one seems eminently sensible to me.</p>
<p>And the BBC point out that the Coalition (National ?) Government have a majority of over 80.  Is it likely to lose a vote on no confidence.</p>
<p>Socialist whinges about &#8216;dictatorships&#8217; (laughable)  after their 13 years of twisting democracy is truly absurd.</p>
<p>But the ground is being laid by the socialists &#8212;   they leave a huge massive deficit and an appallingly rising debt.  A huge pile of poo to clean up. They are clearly all set to rewrite history; Brown has already started by claiming how wonderful the last 13 years have been.  Get real &#8211; he has only achieved raising the national debt to an eye watering 1.4 trillion.  Now we have to pay the bill and suffer accordingly &#8212;  bye bye all his alleged benefits foisted on us with no regard to the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

