<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICM show the Tory lead dropping to 7 points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2466/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2466</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big John</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2466/comment-page-3#comment-600559</link>
		<dc:creator>Big John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2466#comment-600559</guid>
		<description>Perhaps Con home were quoting the new AR poll</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps Con home were quoting the new AR poll</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Boy</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2466/comment-page-3#comment-600543</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2466#comment-600543</guid>
		<description>@ EPOCHERY

what causes confusion when people are trying to decide what size portion of the vote will facilitate what number of seats for each party is solely down to how much you trust swing calculators. I personally do not for one minute believe the Conservatives need an 11 point lead over Labour to get a small majority. if you do, fine. I dont. Therefore how close do Labour need to get to the Tories to remain the largest party? I think a lot closer than you think, and i would bet on 3%.
The Tories need to win roughly the first 75 Labour held target seats to become the largest party. These seats are as good as lost for Labour. The last time i looked the seat in which i live was no. 83 on the target list and the Conservatives are in front here by around 3%.
The news of the world poll in the marginal seats sunday before last showed the Conservatives on course for 38 seat majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ EPOCHERY</p>
<p>what causes confusion when people are trying to decide what size portion of the vote will facilitate what number of seats for each party is solely down to how much you trust swing calculators. I personally do not for one minute believe the Conservatives need an 11 point lead over Labour to get a small majority. if you do, fine. I dont. Therefore how close do Labour need to get to the Tories to remain the largest party? I think a lot closer than you think, and i would bet on 3%.<br />
The Tories need to win roughly the first 75 Labour held target seats to become the largest party. These seats are as good as lost for Labour. The last time i looked the seat in which i live was no. 83 on the target list and the Conservatives are in front here by around 3%.<br />
The news of the world poll in the marginal seats sunday before last showed the Conservatives on course for 38 seat majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2466/comment-page-3#comment-600425</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 09:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2466#comment-600425</guid>
		<description>I have not been following the polls too closely recently.

However 2 significant events have happened this week I think.

1) Labour have finally climbed above 32%, a ceiling that was looking impossible for them to get above
2) Conservatives have now dropped under their safe floor figure of 38% 

this is a real tightening of the polls and if this trend continues could make for a very interesting campaign. I still don&#039;t see where all this talk of a hung parliament is coming from, the Tories are still huge favourites I think, but they must be getting jittery!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not been following the polls too closely recently.</p>
<p>However 2 significant events have happened this week I think.</p>
<p>1) Labour have finally climbed above 32%, a ceiling that was looking impossible for them to get above<br />
2) Conservatives have now dropped under their safe floor figure of 38% </p>
<p>this is a real tightening of the polls and if this trend continues could make for a very interesting campaign. I still don&#8217;t see where all this talk of a hung parliament is coming from, the Tories are still huge favourites I think, but they must be getting jittery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saladin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2466/comment-page-3#comment-600395</link>
		<dc:creator>saladin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2466#comment-600395</guid>
		<description>to say it with  Shakespeare:
Much Ado About Nothing  


it will be interestings how the polls will change (or not) over the next few days</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to say it with  Shakespeare:<br />
Much Ado About Nothing  </p>
<p>it will be interestings how the polls will change (or not) over the next few days</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: saladin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2466/comment-page-3#comment-600394</link>
		<dc:creator>saladin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 07:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2466#comment-600394</guid>
		<description>http://www2.politicalbetting.com/

CONFIRMED - Tory YouGov lead still 6pc
February 23rd, 2010


CON 39% (39)
LAB 33% (33)
LD 17%(17)
Peter Kellner validates the figures - ConHome was wrong

I’ve just managed to get in contact with Peter Kellner and he has confirmed the above figures to me - so ConHome got it wrong. The overnight YouGov daily poll showed no change in any of the numbers from Saturday night.

The fact that there is no change from Sunday must come as major set-back for the Tories - and the Lib Dems. For this suggests that the bullygate business is having no effect.

It might take time to seep in but Labour must be breathing a massive sigh of relief.
Mike Smithson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www2.politicalbetting.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www2.politicalbetting.com/</a></p>
<p>CONFIRMED &#8211; Tory YouGov lead still 6pc<br />
February 23rd, 2010</p>
<p>CON 39% (39)<br />
LAB 33% (33)<br />
LD 17%(17)<br />
Peter Kellner validates the figures &#8211; ConHome was wrong</p>
<p>I’ve just managed to get in contact with Peter Kellner and he has confirmed the above figures to me &#8211; so ConHome got it wrong. The overnight YouGov daily poll showed no change in any of the numbers from Saturday night.</p>
<p>The fact that there is no change from Sunday must come as major set-back for the Tories &#8211; and the Lib Dems. For this suggests that the bullygate business is having no effect.</p>
<p>It might take time to seep in but Labour must be breathing a massive sigh of relief.<br />
Mike Smithson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

