<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Populus snap PBR poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2378/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2378</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lin Rees</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2378/comment-page-1#comment-593661</link>
		<dc:creator>Lin Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 15:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2378#comment-593661</guid>
		<description>Labour should be optimistic on two counts.Firstly the local election results,a real poll. Secondly the fact that on some polls the party is reaching 30% or more.Comments on this site can be very partisan despite claims to the contrary.King Harold it is &#039;site&#039; not &#039;sight.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour should be optimistic on two counts.Firstly the local election results,a real poll. Secondly the fact that on some polls the party is reaching 30% or more.Comments on this site can be very partisan despite claims to the contrary.King Harold it is &#8216;site&#8217; not &#8216;sight.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry P</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2378/comment-page-1#comment-593491</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2378#comment-593491</guid>
		<description>@King Harold

Expecting nothing other than good methodology. Is there anything else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@King Harold</p>
<p>Expecting nothing other than good methodology. Is there anything else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: king harold</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2378/comment-page-1#comment-593490</link>
		<dc:creator>king harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 17:08:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2378#comment-593490</guid>
		<description>Barry P
What are you expecting Barry? A follow on from AR looking good for Dave, or more of the Tory scrape hung parliament stuff.
I bet if we get ComRes and another, one will say Tory lead 6%
and one will say Tory lead 15 %.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry P<br />
What are you expecting Barry? A follow on from AR looking good for Dave, or more of the Tory scrape hung parliament stuff.<br />
I bet if we get ComRes and another, one will say Tory lead 6%<br />
and one will say Tory lead 15 %.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2378/comment-page-1#comment-593489</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2378#comment-593489</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve pruned several comments - because you recognise someone from Comment is Free, it doesn&#039;t mean you should immediately descend to Comment is Free levels! ;)

Comment policy is linked to above, but the short version could probable be &quot;Any comment that would look in place on Comment is Free (or Guido&#039;s site), really isn&#039;t going to fit in round here.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve pruned several comments &#8211; because you recognise someone from Comment is Free, it doesn&#8217;t mean you should immediately descend to Comment is Free levels! <img src='http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Comment policy is linked to above, but the short version could probable be &#8220;Any comment that would look in place on Comment is Free (or Guido&#8217;s site), really isn&#8217;t going to fit in round here.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry P</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2378/comment-page-1#comment-593488</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2378#comment-593488</guid>
		<description>@Statto

Job done. Thank you AW. Can&#039;t wait for next batch of polls, these should, I think, put to bed any idiosyncrasies in the last few, shall we say, rogue polls. Possibly the kiss of death saying that, they may generate more opinions. Lovely stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Statto</p>
<p>Job done. Thank you AW. Can&#8217;t wait for next batch of polls, these should, I think, put to bed any idiosyncrasies in the last few, shall we say, rogue polls. Possibly the kiss of death saying that, they may generate more opinions. Lovely stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

