<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And at the other extreme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldnat</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354/comment-page-2#comment-591960</link>
		<dc:creator>oldnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354#comment-591960</guid>
		<description>Paul McLennan

Nothing yet on their website other than an op-ed article, that the end of the world has come for the SNP. Prof Curtice on Newsnicht suggesting that Lab/SNP percentages are back similar to 2005. I&#039;m waiting to see the detail to see how accurate these are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul McLennan</p>
<p>Nothing yet on their website other than an op-ed article, that the end of the world has come for the SNP. Prof Curtice on Newsnicht suggesting that Lab/SNP percentages are back similar to 2005. I&#8217;m waiting to see the detail to see how accurate these are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin MK2</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354/comment-page-2#comment-591959</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin MK2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354#comment-591959</guid>
		<description>@Pete B

“The hardcore Labour vote is 28%
I think you are right some ducks might vote for Christmas but turkeys never.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pete B</p>
<p>“The hardcore Labour vote is 28%<br />
I think you are right some ducks might vote for Christmas but turkeys never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul McLennan</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354/comment-page-1#comment-591958</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul McLennan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354#comment-591958</guid>
		<description>Poll out in the Daily Telegraph Tuesday re Scottish Voting intentions – any update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll out in the Daily Telegraph Tuesday re Scottish Voting intentions – any update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Stuart</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354/comment-page-1#comment-591951</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354#comment-591951</guid>
		<description>&quot;Realistically, how likely is it that Labour is going to from 29% to 22% in a week?&quot;

Very unlikely, particularly as there have been no sensational political events. However, Labour could quite easily go from 26% to 25% or from 27% to 24% and this would keep both ICM and Angus Reid within their error margins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Realistically, how likely is it that Labour is going to from 29% to 22% in a week?&#8221;</p>
<p>Very unlikely, particularly as there have been no sensational political events. However, Labour could quite easily go from 26% to 25% or from 27% to 24% and this would keep both ICM and Angus Reid within their error margins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Boy</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354/comment-page-1#comment-591947</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2354#comment-591947</guid>
		<description>Imtiaz Kabir,
Labour&#039;s hardcore vote is 28%. Michael Foot got that in 1983.
So why automatically assume an equally useless, dithering, unpopular leader is going to fare as much as 4% better?
As Graham points out the &#039;others&#039; now make up a far bigger proportion of voters than in 1983.
You also state that even disgruntled Labour voters will turn out in the end.
If they do not fall into the true &#039;core vote&#039; category, they might not be intending to do any such thing.
I still believe it is a serious uphill task to poll 31-32% for Labour, they need a few events working in their favour or my money is on 27-28%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imtiaz Kabir,<br />
Labour&#8217;s hardcore vote is 28%. Michael Foot got that in 1983.<br />
So why automatically assume an equally useless, dithering, unpopular leader is going to fare as much as 4% better?<br />
As Graham points out the &#8216;others&#8217; now make up a far bigger proportion of voters than in 1983.<br />
You also state that even disgruntled Labour voters will turn out in the end.<br />
If they do not fall into the true &#8216;core vote&#8217; category, they might not be intending to do any such thing.<br />
I still believe it is a serious uphill task to poll 31-32% for Labour, they need a few events working in their favour or my money is on 27-28%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

