<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on Ipsos MORI&#8217;s 6 point lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351</link>
	<description>Independent Survey and Polling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:18:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liam Curran</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-592109</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Curran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-592109</guid>
		<description>What I have found, when currently canvassing for Labour on the doorstep, is that there isn&#039;t the hostility towards the party that I remember throughout the 80s.

I think the firming of the Labour vote in this poll would seem to reflect that fact,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I have found, when currently canvassing for Labour on the doorstep, is that there isn&#8217;t the hostility towards the party that I remember throughout the 80s.</p>
<p>I think the firming of the Labour vote in this poll would seem to reflect that fact,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Lennon</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-592017</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Lennon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-592017</guid>
		<description>Of course one of the other factors with polls (even, to a lesser extent exit-polls) is how many people lie if they&#039;ve voted for a seemingly unpopular party. Often this can be the encumbent. 

The Scottish vote certainly will play a big part this time.

The apathy wich has coloured recent votes may do also, especially if we are subjected to a near 6 month unofficial campaign following the pre-budget report.

I still think the forthcoming GE might be very close indeed, and psephologically very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course one of the other factors with polls (even, to a lesser extent exit-polls) is how many people lie if they&#8217;ve voted for a seemingly unpopular party. Often this can be the encumbent. </p>
<p>The Scottish vote certainly will play a big part this time.</p>
<p>The apathy wich has coloured recent votes may do also, especially if we are subjected to a near 6 month unofficial campaign following the pre-budget report.</p>
<p>I still think the forthcoming GE might be very close indeed, and psephologically very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Myers</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-591994</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591994</guid>
		<description>It must have been soul destroying to see the latest Angus Reid poll down at Labour HQ. Just when they thought they might be catching up as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It must have been soul destroying to see the latest Angus Reid poll down at Labour HQ. Just when they thought they might be catching up as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Boy</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-591982</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591982</guid>
		<description>Chris,
the fact that you suggest Cameron needs to win lots of Glasgow Easts to win the election shows little or no understanding. It would have been equivalent to suggesting in 1997 that Labour neeeded to win lots of Kensington and Chelsea&#039;s for them to get in power.
Cameron&#039;s battleground is not the likes of Glasgow East, its the likes of Dartford,Chorley,Tynemouth and Bolton.
Nobody ignores Labour&#039;s increase in the polls, but when one shows them on 31 then the next on 22 they need to be treated with caution, not used as the fuel for a one sided, unfounded rant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
the fact that you suggest Cameron needs to win lots of Glasgow Easts to win the election shows little or no understanding. It would have been equivalent to suggesting in 1997 that Labour neeeded to win lots of Kensington and Chelsea&#8217;s for them to get in power.<br />
Cameron&#8217;s battleground is not the likes of Glasgow East, its the likes of Dartford,Chorley,Tynemouth and Bolton.<br />
Nobody ignores Labour&#8217;s increase in the polls, but when one shows them on 31 then the next on 22 they need to be treated with caution, not used as the fuel for a one sided, unfounded rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorsDen</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-591964</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorsDen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591964</guid>
		<description>Dear Chris

In the by election the labour vote was 12,231, 59%)

In 1997 when the seat was Glasgow Springburn, Martin polled 22,534, 71% .

So your contention about Labour increasing its vote seems a little wide of the mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Chris</p>
<p>In the by election the labour vote was 12,231, 59%)</p>
<p>In 1997 when the seat was Glasgow Springburn, Martin polled 22,534, 71% .</p>
<p>So your contention about Labour increasing its vote seems a little wide of the mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorsDen</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-591962</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorsDen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591962</guid>
		<description>Dear Chris- of course we need growth.  We are stuffed without it.

But we need real growth and we need to rebalance (a good labour spin word there for you) our spending.

Brown has been saying we need growth you say?  That growth is the answer?

Well why, despite &#039;growth&#039;,  then did Brown run deficits every year since 2001 after he stopped sticking to Tory spending plans?  We have a massive structural deficit.  Growth alone will not fill that gap, which is why Cameron also talks about spending.

As by now you will know - we have a new poll putting labour on 22 and a tory lead of 17.  You are the clever one; go figure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Chris- of course we need growth.  We are stuffed without it.</p>
<p>But we need real growth and we need to rebalance (a good labour spin word there for you) our spending.</p>
<p>Brown has been saying we need growth you say?  That growth is the answer?</p>
<p>Well why, despite &#8216;growth&#8217;,  then did Brown run deficits every year since 2001 after he stopped sticking to Tory spending plans?  We have a massive structural deficit.  Growth alone will not fill that gap, which is why Cameron also talks about spending.</p>
<p>As by now you will know &#8211; we have a new poll putting labour on 22 and a tory lead of 17.  You are the clever one; go figure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COLIN</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-591897</link>
		<dc:creator>COLIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591897</guid>
		<description>@ CHRIS:-

&quot;Citing “growth” and not cuts.&quot;

You do live in a very one dimensional world Cris.
The two are not incompatible.

Indeed if you believe-as Cameron does-, that defict financing can be  inimical to real sustainable economic growth, then you prefer-as he does-incentives to employment  in the private sector to unproductive expenditure in the State sector.

It&#039;s a balance Chris-not one or the other.

By the way-seen the latest poll?
Confusing isn&#039;t it when you&#039;ve just got all excited.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ CHRIS:-</p>
<p>&#8220;Citing “growth” and not cuts.&#8221;</p>
<p>You do live in a very one dimensional world Cris.<br />
The two are not incompatible.</p>
<p>Indeed if you believe-as Cameron does-, that defict financing can be  inimical to real sustainable economic growth, then you prefer-as he does-incentives to employment  in the private sector to unproductive expenditure in the State sector.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a balance Chris-not one or the other.</p>
<p>By the way-seen the latest poll?<br />
Confusing isn&#8217;t it when you&#8217;ve just got all excited.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-591895</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591895</guid>
		<description>As for the poll, I actually think people think into it too much.

Any Labour gains in polls are either:

1: Ignored by the media, until they change back
2: The media say there&#039;s something wrong with the poll

Every tory drop since conference season, people have blamed the poll it&#039;s in. Including this web site.

It seems that tory gains are just &quot;normal&quot;, but Labour gains &quot;it&#039;s the poll!&quot;.

Personally, if you are canvassing, and looking at the political forums on newspapers, I think it&#039;s personally obvious that the tories polling is going nowhere but down.

Like it or not, they&#039;ve been shown up on the credit crunch. Cameron is in the media today telling us all that backing &quot;growth&quot; is actually the way out. What Brown has been saying for nigh on 2 years.

Europe was a clanger. If you read the forums you would have seen a huge majority of irate tories, thinking they&#039;ve been sold out, and vowing to head to UKIP.

Like it or not, the lack of real accountable policy is still hurting them. Cameron can laugh all he wants about Labour policy, when Brown can just chirp back &quot;what are you actually going to do?&quot;.

Personally, I can quite easily see that when your campaign is built on sand foundations, it won&#039;t take much to knock it down.

No matter how much they hate a leader (see Maggie Thatcher) they will always stick with the status quo, if the opposition hasn&#039;t convinced them that they are up to it themselves.

Continued growth in the future, will do nothing but hurt Cameron. As he&#039;s been the one in the last 2 years, telling us all about how cuts are the only option. And how Brown has been lying to us all about being able to ride growth.

Well Dave, if the economy does have a big rise, cuts are the political equivilant of retiring your prize greyhound after his 10 wins in a row, as you don&#039;t want to risk wasting £20 on food, in case he doesn&#039;t win 11.

So we have Dave in the media, backing growth, and going off the &quot;age of austerity approach&quot;.

The polls will always fluctuate as no one has a clue what Cameron is, and what he plans to do.

The more he flip flops, the more faith will drop.

I think the tories will win, but this claims about going into a election with a 13 point poll lead are wrong.

I&#039;d be amazed if it wasn&#039;t closer to 7 or 8 points. As your poll suggests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the poll, I actually think people think into it too much.</p>
<p>Any Labour gains in polls are either:</p>
<p>1: Ignored by the media, until they change back<br />
2: The media say there&#8217;s something wrong with the poll</p>
<p>Every tory drop since conference season, people have blamed the poll it&#8217;s in. Including this web site.</p>
<p>It seems that tory gains are just &#8220;normal&#8221;, but Labour gains &#8220;it&#8217;s the poll!&#8221;.</p>
<p>Personally, if you are canvassing, and looking at the political forums on newspapers, I think it&#8217;s personally obvious that the tories polling is going nowhere but down.</p>
<p>Like it or not, they&#8217;ve been shown up on the credit crunch. Cameron is in the media today telling us all that backing &#8220;growth&#8221; is actually the way out. What Brown has been saying for nigh on 2 years.</p>
<p>Europe was a clanger. If you read the forums you would have seen a huge majority of irate tories, thinking they&#8217;ve been sold out, and vowing to head to UKIP.</p>
<p>Like it or not, the lack of real accountable policy is still hurting them. Cameron can laugh all he wants about Labour policy, when Brown can just chirp back &#8220;what are you actually going to do?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Personally, I can quite easily see that when your campaign is built on sand foundations, it won&#8217;t take much to knock it down.</p>
<p>No matter how much they hate a leader (see Maggie Thatcher) they will always stick with the status quo, if the opposition hasn&#8217;t convinced them that they are up to it themselves.</p>
<p>Continued growth in the future, will do nothing but hurt Cameron. As he&#8217;s been the one in the last 2 years, telling us all about how cuts are the only option. And how Brown has been lying to us all about being able to ride growth.</p>
<p>Well Dave, if the economy does have a big rise, cuts are the political equivilant of retiring your prize greyhound after his 10 wins in a row, as you don&#8217;t want to risk wasting £20 on food, in case he doesn&#8217;t win 11.</p>
<p>So we have Dave in the media, backing growth, and going off the &#8220;age of austerity approach&#8221;.</p>
<p>The polls will always fluctuate as no one has a clue what Cameron is, and what he plans to do.</p>
<p>The more he flip flops, the more faith will drop.</p>
<p>I think the tories will win, but this claims about going into a election with a 13 point poll lead are wrong.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be amazed if it wasn&#8217;t closer to 7 or 8 points. As your poll suggests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-3#comment-591891</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591891</guid>
		<description>&quot;There are 3 reasons why you don’t need to worry

1 It is a rogue poll
2 It is a rogue poll
3 It is a rogue poll

Just thought of another

4 It is a rogue poll

&quot;


Is that the hands over ears &quot;nanananan it&#039;s not happening&quot; approach.

This poll is quite climatic of the tory overall drops in most polls in the last few months.

The big one may have stayed the same, but they&#039;ve lost ground to Labour on many major sub topics.

I think the tories will be very worried. As there poll lead certainly isn&#039;t growing.

An intelligent view will suggest that it will probably shrink a fair bit before now and then.

Watch Cameron in the news, basically now backing Labour&#039;s approach to deficiet.

Citing &quot;growth&quot; and not cuts.

That&#039;s a man who&#039;s realised that things could possibly be turning</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There are 3 reasons why you don’t need to worry</p>
<p>1 It is a rogue poll<br />
2 It is a rogue poll<br />
3 It is a rogue poll</p>
<p>Just thought of another</p>
<p>4 It is a rogue poll</p>
<p>&#8221;</p>
<p>Is that the hands over ears &#8220;nanananan it&#8217;s not happening&#8221; approach.</p>
<p>This poll is quite climatic of the tory overall drops in most polls in the last few months.</p>
<p>The big one may have stayed the same, but they&#8217;ve lost ground to Labour on many major sub topics.</p>
<p>I think the tories will be very worried. As there poll lead certainly isn&#8217;t growing.</p>
<p>An intelligent view will suggest that it will probably shrink a fair bit before now and then.</p>
<p>Watch Cameron in the news, basically now backing Labour&#8217;s approach to deficiet.</p>
<p>Citing &#8220;growth&#8221; and not cuts.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a man who&#8217;s realised that things could possibly be turning</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2351/comment-page-2#comment-591887</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2351#comment-591887</guid>
		<description>&quot;There’s an interesting article in the Guardian today suggesting that the people who would lose out from a hung parliament the most would be, of all people, the Lib Dems. They would be stuck with the horrors of (a) an alliance with the Tories that could tear the party apart over PR, (b) an alliance with Labour that could destroy the party’s national support, (c) a hung parliament that would let Cameron “do a Salmond” and minority-government Labour and the Liberals to death.

&quot;


There&#039;s no wat the LD will be in parliament wit the tories.

Their principles, manifestos and policies are polls apart.

They are much more likely to get their way with the Labour party.

Clegg will tell the media he won&#039;t side with Labour, as they won&#039;t want to be tarred with their brush.

But I assure you, they will when it counts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There’s an interesting article in the Guardian today suggesting that the people who would lose out from a hung parliament the most would be, of all people, the Lib Dems. They would be stuck with the horrors of (a) an alliance with the Tories that could tear the party apart over PR, (b) an alliance with Labour that could destroy the party’s national support, (c) a hung parliament that would let Cameron “do a Salmond” and minority-government Labour and the Liberals to death.</p>
<p>&#8221;</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no wat the LD will be in parliament wit the tories.</p>
<p>Their principles, manifestos and policies are polls apart.</p>
<p>They are much more likely to get their way with the Labour party.</p>
<p>Clegg will tell the media he won&#8217;t side with Labour, as they won&#8217;t want to be tarred with their brush.</p>
<p>But I assure you, they will when it counts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
