<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sex education in schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337</link>
	<description>Independent Survey and Polling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:17:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John B Dick</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-591070</link>
		<dc:creator>John B Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:46:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-591070</guid>
		<description>What am I doing here! This is about another country in which I and my grandchildren do not live. I have fallen into the trap I have warned about many times in these threads.

Sex education appears to begin at 5, the exciting bits don&#039;t come till late primary school or after. It&#039;s all here.

http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/158295/0042865.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What am I doing here! This is about another country in which I and my grandchildren do not live. I have fallen into the trap I have warned about many times in these threads.</p>
<p>Sex education appears to begin at 5, the exciting bits don&#8217;t come till late primary school or after. It&#8217;s all here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/158295/0042865.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/158295/0042865.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B Dick</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-591051</link>
		<dc:creator>John B Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-591051</guid>
		<description>Seal Pup

My reference to a low age of sex education (not consent) was to growth in Height, not Number of the population and the consequent earlier physical maturity.

Deliberate malnutrition of the Dutch population during the war resulted in birth problems when girls born during that period became mothers. The next generation, better fed and benefiting from modern ante-natal care are growing faster than the Americans (who are getting fatter and shorter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seal Pup</p>
<p>My reference to a low age of sex education (not consent) was to growth in Height, not Number of the population and the consequent earlier physical maturity.</p>
<p>Deliberate malnutrition of the Dutch population during the war resulted in birth problems when girls born during that period became mothers. The next generation, better fed and benefiting from modern ante-natal care are growing faster than the Americans (who are getting fatter and shorter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic Stansfield</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-591032</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic Stansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-591032</guid>
		<description>On reflection, I should have been more general in my previous post on this thread, although I stand by what I said in particular about forced marriages. It is sadly the case that some parents abuse their children, at any age up to (and indeed beyond)16, and that compulsory sex education may afford opportunities to prevent or detect this. 

Seal Pup,  I never specifically mentioned Muslim families. I referred to problems relating to people from a specific geographical area, but I think these problems arise out of their long-standing culture rather than their religious beliefs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On reflection, I should have been more general in my previous post on this thread, although I stand by what I said in particular about forced marriages. It is sadly the case that some parents abuse their children, at any age up to (and indeed beyond)16, and that compulsory sex education may afford opportunities to prevent or detect this. </p>
<p>Seal Pup,  I never specifically mentioned Muslim families. I referred to problems relating to people from a specific geographical area, but I think these problems arise out of their long-standing culture rather than their religious beliefs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davey</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-590913</link>
		<dc:creator>davey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-590913</guid>
		<description>I would be really interested in the background work to support compulsory sex education.  Has Ed balls discovered that those children currently withdrawn from such classes are one of the main reasons for the rise in teenage pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and an increase in suicide among the young?  If so then this legislation seems a good idea.  Also what do the rest of Europe, who appear to be coping so much better, do?

I suspect any opposition to this legislation is due to suspicion about the Government&#039;s motives, which publication of an objective review and analysis (if there is one) might allay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be really interested in the background work to support compulsory sex education.  Has Ed balls discovered that those children currently withdrawn from such classes are one of the main reasons for the rise in teenage pregnancy, sexually transmitted diseases, and an increase in suicide among the young?  If so then this legislation seems a good idea.  Also what do the rest of Europe, who appear to be coping so much better, do?</p>
<p>I suspect any opposition to this legislation is due to suspicion about the Government&#8217;s motives, which publication of an objective review and analysis (if there is one) might allay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolf</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-590878</link>
		<dc:creator>wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-590878</guid>
		<description>Has the Labour Party consulted its teacher members to see if this is a good idea?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has the Labour Party consulted its teacher members to see if this is a good idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COLIN</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-590872</link>
		<dc:creator>COLIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 12:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-590872</guid>
		<description>This is a view in one of the newspapers:-

&quot;Will people like the wretched Balls never learn? Can&#039;t he see that it is his government&#039;s policies that have led to countless poorly-educated young girls thinking that getting pregnant is the quickest way to picking up both a large welfare cheque and a key to their own council flat. 
The tragedy is that ministers seem utterly incapable of realising that it is proper education that these girls need to help them escape poverty - not more sex lessons. &quot;

This viewpoint resonates  particularly with me having spent a  half-term week week with my chidren &amp; grandchildren.

One of my two teenage grandaughters describes classes in which the teacher doesn&#039;t turn up &amp; children sit waiting; classes in which teachers stand in to take a subject they do not understand, and subjects which are of particular interest to her  which are taught at a level she finds simplistic ,boring &amp; patronising.

As a result she is totally cynical about her so called education.

Try joining Facebook -as I have just done-and read your children&#039;s &amp; grandchildren&#039;s exchanges.

Their education is a joke for some of our youngsters.
No wonder we have the highest rate of teenage pregnancies in Europe-sex must be  something interesting to do as a stimulating change from school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a view in one of the newspapers:-</p>
<p>&#8220;Will people like the wretched Balls never learn? Can&#8217;t he see that it is his government&#8217;s policies that have led to countless poorly-educated young girls thinking that getting pregnant is the quickest way to picking up both a large welfare cheque and a key to their own council flat.<br />
The tragedy is that ministers seem utterly incapable of realising that it is proper education that these girls need to help them escape poverty &#8211; not more sex lessons. &#8221;</p>
<p>This viewpoint resonates  particularly with me having spent a  half-term week week with my chidren &amp; grandchildren.</p>
<p>One of my two teenage grandaughters describes classes in which the teacher doesn&#8217;t turn up &amp; children sit waiting; classes in which teachers stand in to take a subject they do not understand, and subjects which are of particular interest to her  which are taught at a level she finds simplistic ,boring &amp; patronising.</p>
<p>As a result she is totally cynical about her so called education.</p>
<p>Try joining Facebook -as I have just done-and read your children&#8217;s &amp; grandchildren&#8217;s exchanges.</p>
<p>Their education is a joke for some of our youngsters.<br />
No wonder we have the highest rate of teenage pregnancies in Europe-sex must be  something interesting to do as a stimulating change from school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: COLIN</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-590869</link>
		<dc:creator>COLIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-590869</guid>
		<description>I would guess that many of the parents who have reservations about this would not be opposed to teaching sex in a biology context.That is to say, how it works ,  what physiological changes result from it  , and the development of the resultant baby.

What many people ( I believe) are very wary of is the teaching of this subject -particularly to young children-in the context  of &quot;ethics&quot;, &quot;emotions&quot;, &quot;relationships&quot; .....and that much misused word &quot;values&quot;.

These contexts allow far  too much scope for the teacher to promote ideas &amp; attitudes which they espouse, but which may not tally with those of the child&#039;s parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that many of the parents who have reservations about this would not be opposed to teaching sex in a biology context.That is to say, how it works ,  what physiological changes result from it  , and the development of the resultant baby.</p>
<p>What many people ( I believe) are very wary of is the teaching of this subject -particularly to young children-in the context  of &#8220;ethics&#8221;, &#8220;emotions&#8221;, &#8220;relationships&#8221; &#8230;..and that much misused word &#8220;values&#8221;.</p>
<p>These contexts allow far  too much scope for the teacher to promote ideas &amp; attitudes which they espouse, but which may not tally with those of the child&#8217;s parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kieran W</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-590866</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-590866</guid>
		<description>I would dispute Seal Pup&#039;s assertion that I was proposing that children be treated as adults. What I do believe though is that the transition from childhood to adulthood is a gradual process, rather than some &quot;big bang&quot; at 16, 18, 21 or whatever. It simply does not make any sense to not take any account of the fact that the transition to adulthood begins at the start of puberty, which can be as early as 11 years old. It is in preparation for the beginning of this transition that children should be provided with proper sex education, irrespective of the wishes of their parents. 

I notice that no poster who has raised the point that &quot;children belong to their parents, not the state&quot; has addressed my point that not all parents are good parents. It simply is not enough just to say that government should just get out of the way and allow untrammelled &quot;parental choice&quot; to decide the educational outcomes of every child on the country. We already have a situation where parental choice is limited in the sense that all children must be provided with some kind of education which meets certain minimum standards. To me sex education is a key aspect of an education which meets those minimum standards.

Neil, you write that &quot;there is absolutely no need for 5 year olds to be taught about puberty, or 7 year olds about same sex marriage. That is the content of primary school sex education in the UK, which is frankly pretty shocking&quot;. Those ages are too young to be learning about such things. However 10 or 11 is in my view not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would dispute Seal Pup&#8217;s assertion that I was proposing that children be treated as adults. What I do believe though is that the transition from childhood to adulthood is a gradual process, rather than some &#8220;big bang&#8221; at 16, 18, 21 or whatever. It simply does not make any sense to not take any account of the fact that the transition to adulthood begins at the start of puberty, which can be as early as 11 years old. It is in preparation for the beginning of this transition that children should be provided with proper sex education, irrespective of the wishes of their parents. </p>
<p>I notice that no poster who has raised the point that &#8220;children belong to their parents, not the state&#8221; has addressed my point that not all parents are good parents. It simply is not enough just to say that government should just get out of the way and allow untrammelled &#8220;parental choice&#8221; to decide the educational outcomes of every child on the country. We already have a situation where parental choice is limited in the sense that all children must be provided with some kind of education which meets certain minimum standards. To me sex education is a key aspect of an education which meets those minimum standards.</p>
<p>Neil, you write that &#8220;there is absolutely no need for 5 year olds to be taught about puberty, or 7 year olds about same sex marriage. That is the content of primary school sex education in the UK, which is frankly pretty shocking&#8221;. Those ages are too young to be learning about such things. However 10 or 11 is in my view not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Fear</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-590860</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Fear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-590860</guid>
		<description>Seal Pup,

That&#039;s the nub of it.  In terms of peoples&#039; ethical values, this is a minefield.  You either end up with a subject that is extremely contentious, and generates real anger among many parents and pupils, or else, like RE, bland lowest common denominator stuff.

It&#039;s typical of this government to think that every social problem can be fixed by the government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seal Pup,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s the nub of it.  In terms of peoples&#8217; ethical values, this is a minefield.  You either end up with a subject that is extremely contentious, and generates real anger among many parents and pupils, or else, like RE, bland lowest common denominator stuff.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s typical of this government to think that every social problem can be fixed by the government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2337/comment-page-1#comment-590858</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 01:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2337#comment-590858</guid>
		<description>Seal Pup&#039;s first point is a very good one - it reaches the heart of the issue - we do not belong to the government, and therefore they have NO right to tell us how to educate our children.

On sex education - it is suitable for secondary school children - but there is absolutely no need for 5 year olds to be taught about puberty, or 7 year olds about same sex marriage.  That is the content of primary school sex education in the UK, which is frankly pretty shocking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seal Pup&#8217;s first point is a very good one &#8211; it reaches the heart of the issue &#8211; we do not belong to the government, and therefore they have NO right to tell us how to educate our children.</p>
<p>On sex education &#8211; it is suitable for secondary school children &#8211; but there is absolutely no need for 5 year olds to be taught about puberty, or 7 year olds about same sex marriage.  That is the content of primary school sex education in the UK, which is frankly pretty shocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
