<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ipsos MORI show 17 point Tory lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2318/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2318</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seal Pup</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2318/comment-page-1#comment-590221</link>
		<dc:creator>Seal Pup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2318#comment-590221</guid>
		<description>&quot;Frederic Stansfield

This is a strange set of results. I am inclined to think Ipsos MORI may have been unlucky and got a couple of rogue samples. Let’s see what happens in the next few opinion polls before drawing too many conclusions from this one.&quot;

I disagree... I find MORI far more plausible than some of the others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Frederic Stansfield</p>
<p>This is a strange set of results. I am inclined to think Ipsos MORI may have been unlucky and got a couple of rogue samples. Let’s see what happens in the next few opinion polls before drawing too many conclusions from this one.&#8221;</p>
<p>I disagree&#8230; I find MORI far more plausible than some of the others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frederic Stansfield</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2318/comment-page-1#comment-590212</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic Stansfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2318#comment-590212</guid>
		<description>This is a strange set of results. I am inclined to think Ipsos MORI may have been unlucky and got a couple of rogue samples. Let&#039;s see what happens in the next few opinion polls before drawing too many conclusions from this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a strange set of results. I am inclined to think Ipsos MORI may have been unlucky and got a couple of rogue samples. Let&#8217;s see what happens in the next few opinion polls before drawing too many conclusions from this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Stidwill</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2318/comment-page-1#comment-590145</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Stidwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2318#comment-590145</guid>
		<description>Obviously this means that any Labour seat in England with the Tories in second place where their majority is 23% or less is in danger - which is pretty sobering news for the government. The other poll today is also giving a 17% lead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously this means that any Labour seat in England with the Tories in second place where their majority is 23% or less is in danger &#8211; which is pretty sobering news for the government. The other poll today is also giving a 17% lead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldnat</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2318/comment-page-1#comment-590139</link>
		<dc:creator>oldnat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2318#comment-590139</guid>
		<description>Andy Stidwill

Double checked - those are the numbers for England. I simply mistyped the Eng/GB sample sizes.

People will know that I have argued that including the data from Scotland (and probably Wales) distorts the data for the political system that provides the vast majority of MPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy Stidwill</p>
<p>Double checked &#8211; those are the numbers for England. I simply mistyped the Eng/GB sample sizes.</p>
<p>People will know that I have argued that including the data from Scotland (and probably Wales) distorts the data for the political system that provides the vast majority of MPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Stidwill</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2318/comment-page-1#comment-590138</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Stidwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:19:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2318#comment-590138</guid>
		<description>Are your English percentages still correct?

If so, that would be a swing in England of about 11.5% compared to 10% in GB.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are your English percentages still correct?</p>
<p>If so, that would be a swing in England of about 11.5% compared to 10% in GB.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

