<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2200/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2200</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Myers</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2200/comment-page-1#comment-585294</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 21:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2200#comment-585294</guid>
		<description>The average result of the two polls of 40C: 24L: 20LD would give a Tory majority of 86. 

It also looks like the trend is for the Tory lead holding, if not increasing slightly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average result of the two polls of 40C: 24L: 20LD would give a Tory majority of 86. </p>
<p>It also looks like the trend is for the Tory lead holding, if not increasing slightly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen W</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2200/comment-page-1#comment-585288</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2200#comment-585288</guid>
		<description>UKIP are  surprisingly low in the breakdown for those others considering the Euros.  Well below BNP?  Doesn&#039;t appear they&#039;ve gone flooding back to the Tories either, at least in relation to the others.

Very bad results for Labour 
      
  Comres Yougov
Con 38 42 %
Lab  23 25 %
Lib   22 18 %
Con lead 15 17 %
in both Polls Cons increase lead and Labour remain in fail to break even back in high 20&#039;s.  
Good results for Libs from Comres, within 1pt of Labour in a poll, though either one of the lib results is rogue or their real result is somewhere in the middle of the two.  Still it&#039;s their best poll result since they almost caught level with Labour at the end of May/start of June.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UKIP are  surprisingly low in the breakdown for those others considering the Euros.  Well below BNP?  Doesn&#8217;t appear they&#8217;ve gone flooding back to the Tories either, at least in relation to the others.</p>
<p>Very bad results for Labour </p>
<p>  Comres Yougov<br />
Con 38 42 %<br />
Lab  23 25 %<br />
Lib   22 18 %<br />
Con lead 15 17 %<br />
in both Polls Cons increase lead and Labour remain in fail to break even back in high 20&#8242;s.<br />
Good results for Libs from Comres, within 1pt of Labour in a poll, though either one of the lib results is rogue or their real result is somewhere in the middle of the two.  Still it&#8217;s their best poll result since they almost caught level with Labour at the end of May/start of June.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: plumbus</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2200/comment-page-1#comment-585287</link>
		<dc:creator>plumbus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2200#comment-585287</guid>
		<description>I expect Norwhich to be a straight fight between the Tories &amp; Lib-dems with Labour having to scrabble with various others for a poor third place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I expect Norwhich to be a straight fight between the Tories &amp; Lib-dems with Labour having to scrabble with various others for a poor third place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David D</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2200/comment-page-1#comment-585286</link>
		<dc:creator>David D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2200#comment-585286</guid>
		<description>On the basis of these polls it appears that Labour are likely to enter the recess having lost the Norwich by election and facing a large Tory majority.

The summer recess is traditionally one that is good for the Government as they can make the news but may be that won&#039;t be true this year with job and Afghanistan losses likely to be the main news drivers

Thus in September are we likely to see a realisation amongst Labour MPs (and Mandleson) they have nothing to lose by changing leader for an election in say Oct/Nov might give a boost that Brown could never achieve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the basis of these polls it appears that Labour are likely to enter the recess having lost the Norwich by election and facing a large Tory majority.</p>
<p>The summer recess is traditionally one that is good for the Government as they can make the news but may be that won&#8217;t be true this year with job and Afghanistan losses likely to be the main news drivers</p>
<p>Thus in September are we likely to see a realisation amongst Labour MPs (and Mandleson) they have nothing to lose by changing leader for an election in say Oct/Nov might give a boost that Brown could never achieve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonboy</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2200/comment-page-1#comment-585285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 20:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2200#comment-585285</guid>
		<description>BBQ? This weather?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBQ? This weather?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

