<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New MORI Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183/comment-page-3#comment-584079</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183#comment-584079</guid>
		<description>STATTO &quot;and three months ago, “independent” forecasters (and Cameron/Osborne) were saying the Treasury’s forecasts for growth of -3.5% in 2009 were fantasy. Now they look like they may be spot on.&quot;.

They still appear to grossly overstate the likely growth. Please look at the latest independent forecasts including the most recent CBI prediction</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STATTO &#8220;and three months ago, “independent” forecasters (and Cameron/Osborne) were saying the Treasury’s forecasts for growth of -3.5% in 2009 were fantasy. Now they look like they may be spot on.&#8221;.</p>
<p>They still appear to grossly overstate the likely growth. Please look at the latest independent forecasts including the most recent CBI prediction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183/comment-page-3#comment-584078</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183#comment-584078</guid>
		<description>Poll Alert !

On the Independent&#039;s site John Rentoul is promising a Comres poll in tomorrows independent...

Lets see if they can come up with a load of balloney like their recent  attempts ! 

Anthony are we getting any other polls this weekend ?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll Alert !</p>
<p>On the Independent&#8217;s site John Rentoul is promising a Comres poll in tomorrows independent&#8230;</p>
<p>Lets see if they can come up with a load of balloney like their recent  attempts ! </p>
<p>Anthony are we getting any other polls this weekend ?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Dean</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183/comment-page-3#comment-584076</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183#comment-584076</guid>
		<description>Further to my last post about different kinds of LD/Con marginals, a former colleague has pointed out something interesting.
Look at seats Labour won, or came very close, in 1945 in the SE and SW regions outside the big cities. Then look at all the seats the LDs have gained and either held or lost back to the Conservatives since 1997........the list has an uncanny correllation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my last post about different kinds of LD/Con marginals, a former colleague has pointed out something interesting.<br />
Look at seats Labour won, or came very close, in 1945 in the SE and SW regions outside the big cities. Then look at all the seats the LDs have gained and either held or lost back to the Conservatives since 1997&#8230;&#8230;..the list has an uncanny correllation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183/comment-page-3#comment-584071</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 08:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183#comment-584071</guid>
		<description>&#039;ADAM TEBBLE
Quite possibly the most unpopular Labour government ever and they still get a third of the public sector vote? Sounds like a rapantly self-interested, block vote to me.&#039;

Actually a third support does not sound like a block vote. It sounds quite close to the core vote figures bandied around here given the often low paid nature of most public service jobs. 

So; the Labour support in the PS seems to reflect the percentage support outside the PS for the same SES status. What a (not) surprise...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;ADAM TEBBLE<br />
Quite possibly the most unpopular Labour government ever and they still get a third of the public sector vote? Sounds like a rapantly self-interested, block vote to me.&#8217;</p>
<p>Actually a third support does not sound like a block vote. It sounds quite close to the core vote figures bandied around here given the often low paid nature of most public service jobs. </p>
<p>So; the Labour support in the PS seems to reflect the percentage support outside the PS for the same SES status. What a (not) surprise&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dean thomson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183/comment-page-3#comment-584066</link>
		<dc:creator>dean thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2183#comment-584066</guid>
		<description>Prediction

Con:  38-41%
Lab:   24-27%
Lib:    17-20%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prediction</p>
<p>Con:  38-41%<br />
Lab:   24-27%<br />
Lib:    17-20%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

