<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking for exit polls?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2166/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2166</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippa</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2166/comment-page-7#comment-583078</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2166#comment-583078</guid>
		<description>Quincel,

Counting begins at 5pm today in London if that helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quincel,</p>
<p>Counting begins at 5pm today in London if that helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir Stitt</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2166/comment-page-7#comment-583074</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir Stitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 09:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2166#comment-583074</guid>
		<description>Thanks Anthony,
Perhaps the beeb should put some methodology on their website, it would be helpful. 

Is that all of England or all of GB?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Anthony,<br />
Perhaps the beeb should put some methodology on their website, it would be helpful. </p>
<p>Is that all of England or all of GB?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2166/comment-page-7#comment-583071</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2166#comment-583071</guid>
		<description>By the way, an odd follow-up: When were the filing deadlines for the local races?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, an odd follow-up: When were the filing deadlines for the local races?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gray</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2166/comment-page-7#comment-583069</link>
		<dc:creator>Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2166#comment-583069</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to also note that I find the extrapolations of parties&#039; votes to be terribly useless this time.  Though I know Labour tends to do poorly in a lot of these races, I do suspect that they had an unusual amount of trouble getting candidates to run this time.  In some counties, I&#039;d wonder if someone hadn&#039;t mixed up the century given how poorly organized Labour seemed to be (and how well, by comparison, the LibDems were doing): Labour came second on exactly four occasions, and three of those were places they had controlled (the exception was Cumbria, which seems &quot;uncontrollable&quot; as a rule).  In Staffordshire, they went straight from government to fourth place as far as seats went.  On no less than 4 occasions they seem to have been outdone in seat totals by a minor party (my personal favorite being Staffordshire on account of UKIP and the LibDems getting to flip a coin for opposition there), and on four occasions they got blown clear off (incl. Cornwall) while they were knocked down to a single seat on 5 more councils.

Finally...what the devil happened in Cornwall?  32 independents makes no sense whatsoever...nothing like that seems to have happened elsewhere, so why Cornwall?  Was it just being a new unitary authority, or was there something funny going on there?  I ask not only because of the pile-o-indies, but also because Labour regularly embarassed themselves there with low single digit vote shares and finishes in 5th or less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to also note that I find the extrapolations of parties&#8217; votes to be terribly useless this time.  Though I know Labour tends to do poorly in a lot of these races, I do suspect that they had an unusual amount of trouble getting candidates to run this time.  In some counties, I&#8217;d wonder if someone hadn&#8217;t mixed up the century given how poorly organized Labour seemed to be (and how well, by comparison, the LibDems were doing): Labour came second on exactly four occasions, and three of those were places they had controlled (the exception was Cumbria, which seems &#8220;uncontrollable&#8221; as a rule).  In Staffordshire, they went straight from government to fourth place as far as seats went.  On no less than 4 occasions they seem to have been outdone in seat totals by a minor party (my personal favorite being Staffordshire on account of UKIP and the LibDems getting to flip a coin for opposition there), and on four occasions they got blown clear off (incl. Cornwall) while they were knocked down to a single seat on 5 more councils.</p>
<p>Finally&#8230;what the devil happened in Cornwall?  32 independents makes no sense whatsoever&#8230;nothing like that seems to have happened elsewhere, so why Cornwall?  Was it just being a new unitary authority, or was there something funny going on there?  I ask not only because of the pile-o-indies, but also because Labour regularly embarassed themselves there with low single digit vote shares and finishes in 5th or less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Stidwill</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2166/comment-page-7#comment-583053</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Stidwill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:35:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2166#comment-583053</guid>
		<description>The Tory share is actually 2% lower this year compared to 2004 with the R+T projections so the predicted Tory share in the Euro election this year should have been 24.7% not 25.7%. The other figures are correct:

C - 24.7%
Lab - 18.6%
LD - 12.9%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Tory share is actually 2% lower this year compared to 2004 with the R+T projections so the predicted Tory share in the Euro election this year should have been 24.7% not 25.7%. The other figures are correct:</p>
<p>C &#8211; 24.7%<br />
Lab &#8211; 18.6%<br />
LD &#8211; 12.9%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

