<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the expenses scandal driving turnout down?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2137/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2137</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laz henson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2137/comment-page-1#comment-581243</link>
		<dc:creator>laz henson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2137#comment-581243</guid>
		<description>Paul H-J
Thanks for your opinion - just a little under my guestimate!
In my area 22% have postal votes and I realise some have moved etc but many will use them. I wonder if the figures holds up in all parts of the country? 
Certainly there is a feeling of &#039;&#039;why should I vote&#039;&#039; and of course the postal votes go out now, this the feeling gets voted on now (or not) and not on 4th June!
Any other guesses please?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul H-J<br />
Thanks for your opinion &#8211; just a little under my guestimate!<br />
In my area 22% have postal votes and I realise some have moved etc but many will use them. I wonder if the figures holds up in all parts of the country?<br />
Certainly there is a feeling of &#8221;why should I vote&#8221; and of course the postal votes go out now, this the feeling gets voted on now (or not) and not on 4th June!<br />
Any other guesses please?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Promsan</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2137/comment-page-1#comment-581237</link>
		<dc:creator>Promsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 19:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2137#comment-581237</guid>
		<description>...anyway it&#039;s not the expenses scandal that&#039;s driving turnout down, that&#039;s just the surface of the ocean of resentment.... the straw that&#039;s broken the camel&#039;s back etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;anyway it&#8217;s not the expenses scandal that&#8217;s driving turnout down, that&#8217;s just the surface of the ocean of resentment&#8230;. the straw that&#8217;s broken the camel&#8217;s back etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Promsan</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2137/comment-page-1#comment-581225</link>
		<dc:creator>Promsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2137#comment-581225</guid>
		<description>&quot;Richard B

This same poll says that 54% of people want a general election now, yet only 45% say they would definitely vote in it. Strange. Very strange.&quot;

Not really - many people feel overworked and underpaid and would be happy for someone else to do their voting for them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Richard B</p>
<p>This same poll says that 54% of people want a general election now, yet only 45% say they would definitely vote in it. Strange. Very strange.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not really &#8211; many people feel overworked and underpaid and would be happy for someone else to do their voting for them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2137/comment-page-1#comment-581223</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 18:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2137#comment-581223</guid>
		<description>&quot;if you pay peanuts then you will get monkeys&quot;

We certainly have some of the latter at Westminster.

Are they being paid &quot;peanuts&quot;?-when you  compare the salary with those in a profession say who have had to gain a qualification by years of study?

Some may have professional qualifications of course, together with the associated expertise one hopes.....but it is not a requirement in order to be an MP. 

You can just be a monkey-all you have to do is get elected.

I heard Nadine Dorries on radio this morning describing MPs as &quot;professionals&quot;. I think they get themselves way out of focus sometimes-that&#039;s why they started troughing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;if you pay peanuts then you will get monkeys&#8221;</p>
<p>We certainly have some of the latter at Westminster.</p>
<p>Are they being paid &#8220;peanuts&#8221;?-when you  compare the salary with those in a profession say who have had to gain a qualification by years of study?</p>
<p>Some may have professional qualifications of course, together with the associated expertise one hopes&#8230;..but it is not a requirement in order to be an MP. </p>
<p>You can just be a monkey-all you have to do is get elected.</p>
<p>I heard Nadine Dorries on radio this morning describing MPs as &#8220;professionals&#8221;. I think they get themselves way out of focus sometimes-that&#8217;s why they started troughing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H-J</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/2137/comment-page-1#comment-581222</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H-J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=2137#comment-581222</guid>
		<description>Laz,

Too high, nearer 25% - probably 27-28% on average.

Remember that the turnout in 2004 was inflated by all-postal voting in several regions. That is not happening this time, and with no local elections in Scotland, Wales, London, North East and large chunks of metropolitan England (affects NW, Y&amp;H and WM most) we could see some areas drop as low as 20% turnout with 30% at the top end of the scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laz,</p>
<p>Too high, nearer 25% &#8211; probably 27-28% on average.</p>
<p>Remember that the turnout in 2004 was inflated by all-postal voting in several regions. That is not happening this time, and with no local elections in Scotland, Wales, London, North East and large chunks of metropolitan England (affects NW, Y&amp;H and WM most) we could see some areas drop as low as 20% turnout with 30% at the top end of the scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

