<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A contrasting picture from YouGov</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897</link>
	<description>Independent Survey and Polling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 05:08:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wolf</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-2#comment-549983</link>
		<dc:creator>wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549983</guid>
		<description>Labour are doing very well holding vital local council seats. Unfortunately their paymasters the unions appear to have lost patience with Gordon Brown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour are doing very well holding vital local council seats. Unfortunately their paymasters the unions appear to have lost patience with Gordon Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan the Terrible</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-2#comment-549937</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan the Terrible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549937</guid>
		<description>On the point about by-election results, I&#039;ve looked at the site Anthony posted and the results seem to back up the polls in my view. 

Tories holding their own from an elevated starting point and the Libs nicking a few from Labour. Fits the polling narrative perfectly or am I missing something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the point about by-election results, I&#8217;ve looked at the site Anthony posted and the results seem to back up the polls in my view. </p>
<p>Tories holding their own from an elevated starting point and the Libs nicking a few from Labour. Fits the polling narrative perfectly or am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan the Terrible</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549934</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan the Terrible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549934</guid>
		<description>James,

They&#039;re beginning to realise they can&#039;t stop the Tories from winning I suspect!

Though I will doubtless be called a sceptic there is a great deal of evidence of the BBC being Labour/Liberal biased. 

Tales of broadcasting house being strewn with champagne bottles after the &#039;97 election are numerous and Vince Cable is practically treated as their economics correspondant.

With an incoming Tory administration and tighter purse stings among the general public in a year or two the idea of a reduced TV license or even, god forbid, sharing the pot with the private media companies will be a popular option. 

I suspect a less partisan approach is being pushed by managers now. I doubt it will help them though, the fervour for &#039;change&#039; among grass roots Conservatives will see the power of the BBC curtailed come what may.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>They&#8217;re beginning to realise they can&#8217;t stop the Tories from winning I suspect!</p>
<p>Though I will doubtless be called a sceptic there is a great deal of evidence of the BBC being Labour/Liberal biased. </p>
<p>Tales of broadcasting house being strewn with champagne bottles after the &#8216;97 election are numerous and Vince Cable is practically treated as their economics correspondant.</p>
<p>With an incoming Tory administration and tighter purse stings among the general public in a year or two the idea of a reduced TV license or even, god forbid, sharing the pot with the private media companies will be a popular option. </p>
<p>I suspect a less partisan approach is being pushed by managers now. I doubt it will help them though, the fervour for &#8216;change&#8217; among grass roots Conservatives will see the power of the BBC curtailed come what may.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Ludlow</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549902</link>
		<dc:creator>James Ludlow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549902</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m noticing that for the past week or so, the BBC has been paying a lot more attention to what the Tories are saying and doing. Tory proposals are being headlined now rather than shunted into Item 5 sidings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m noticing that for the past week or so, the BBC has been paying a lot more attention to what the Tories are saying and doing. Tory proposals are being headlined now rather than shunted into Item 5 sidings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Bailey</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549893</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Bailey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 06:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549893</guid>
		<description>We also have to factor in events between now and the GE. At the moment the Tories narrative has finally found traction and Brown is clearly a man under fire. 

12 months down the line we may find that Brown has been an instrumental player in this summer&#039;s G20/Obama project to build a new economic system, and that Cameron&#039;s policies are completely isolated and out of step with the new reality being enacted across Europe.

Thats not to say that Cameron&#039;s tactics may not work - its just that if he finds himself increasingly having to explain how he is right and everyone else is wrong its going to be very hard for him. The one thing most pundits seem to agree on is that the Tory vote isn&#039;t very hard yet - easy to take current polls and say &quot;its a shoo-in&quot; but weren&#039;t polls radically different before Christmas?

Events dear boy, events....!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We also have to factor in events between now and the GE. At the moment the Tories narrative has finally found traction and Brown is clearly a man under fire. </p>
<p>12 months down the line we may find that Brown has been an instrumental player in this summer&#8217;s G20/Obama project to build a new economic system, and that Cameron&#8217;s policies are completely isolated and out of step with the new reality being enacted across Europe.</p>
<p>Thats not to say that Cameron&#8217;s tactics may not work &#8211; its just that if he finds himself increasingly having to explain how he is right and everyone else is wrong its going to be very hard for him. The one thing most pundits seem to agree on is that the Tory vote isn&#8217;t very hard yet &#8211; easy to take current polls and say &#8220;its a shoo-in&#8221; but weren&#8217;t polls radically different before Christmas?</p>
<p>Events dear boy, events&#8230;.!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James B</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549785</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:31:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549785</guid>
		<description>I think if they recovered it would be because the economy does turn out to be less severe than forecast - or more specifically, shows some tangible signs of stabilising and shoots about a year from now.
How receptive people are even to a few shoots when they&#039;ve been through another year of this is a bit of a tall order.

I suppose making the Tories out to be a do nothing/bankers party remains an option, but do suspect that option is rather running out/is likely to prove insufficient.

But, looking at it the other way round, the Conservatives have not yet won.  And those who avoid the worst consequences of this recession could see more money in their incomes even if wages flatline, although utility bills could rise again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if they recovered it would be because the economy does turn out to be less severe than forecast &#8211; or more specifically, shows some tangible signs of stabilising and shoots about a year from now.<br />
How receptive people are even to a few shoots when they&#8217;ve been through another year of this is a bit of a tall order.</p>
<p>I suppose making the Tories out to be a do nothing/bankers party remains an option, but do suspect that option is rather running out/is likely to prove insufficient.</p>
<p>But, looking at it the other way round, the Conservatives have not yet won.  And those who avoid the worst consequences of this recession could see more money in their incomes even if wages flatline, although utility bills could rise again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip JW</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549777</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip JW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549777</guid>
		<description>The question has been raised whether it is possible for Labour to recover from 25%.

Well firstly, we should remember that at present Labour are averaging 29%. And more importantly as Gin pointed out is there enough time left for a recovery?

When the polls for the February before the year of the last GE are examined we find Labour to be averaging 35%, and throughout most of the year there is a high degree of consistancy. A slight increase occurs around the end of that year and Labour finally gain 36% of the votes GE.

If the same pattern is followed then Labour will end up getting 30% of the votes at the next GE. But given the declining state of the economy it is hard to imagine that Labour&#039;s popularity will not decline with it.

A leadership contest may occur in the summer. But this is high unlikely unless Labour are averaging 26% or less. And while a 10% improvement in 10 months is not impossible, it would be very difficult, certainly an awesome achievement!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question has been raised whether it is possible for Labour to recover from 25%.</p>
<p>Well firstly, we should remember that at present Labour are averaging 29%. And more importantly as Gin pointed out is there enough time left for a recovery?</p>
<p>When the polls for the February before the year of the last GE are examined we find Labour to be averaging 35%, and throughout most of the year there is a high degree of consistancy. A slight increase occurs around the end of that year and Labour finally gain 36% of the votes GE.</p>
<p>If the same pattern is followed then Labour will end up getting 30% of the votes at the next GE. But given the declining state of the economy it is hard to imagine that Labour&#8217;s popularity will not decline with it.</p>
<p>A leadership contest may occur in the summer. But this is high unlikely unless Labour are averaging 26% or less. And while a 10% improvement in 10 months is not impossible, it would be very difficult, certainly an awesome achievement!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549775</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549775</guid>
		<description>Gordon is an idiot, Ken Clarke is a fiscal god, Vince Cable would make a better leader for the libs - whew sorry I was feeling repressed with all this non partisanship stuff :-)

Is anyone aware of local government overspend this year that may stop almost all non essential capital projects next year and specifically in context to this site, does this have a bearing on any ballot systems that were due to be replaced? Sorry but thought someone on here might know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon is an idiot, Ken Clarke is a fiscal god, Vince Cable would make a better leader for the libs &#8211; whew sorry I was feeling repressed with all this non partisanship stuff <img src='http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Is anyone aware of local government overspend this year that may stop almost all non essential capital projects next year and specifically in context to this site, does this have a bearing on any ballot systems that were due to be replaced? Sorry but thought someone on here might know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James B</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549767</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549767</guid>
		<description>The December 1981 figure of Conservatives on 23% was dreadful, but was perhaps the point when the SDP really took off.
The Crosby by-election was in late November, and although the savage recession actually ended several months earlier, no-one would have believed it at the time. Also, inflation was still a problem and interest rates had to go back up.

And that 24% figure in August 1985 was a Gallup poll, and they had some outdated methods which were revised at the end of 1996, suddenly reducing 40 point Labour leads to around 18.

I think there is a difference between hitting a dire figure like 25 or 23 per cent on a few slightly freakish occasions, and settling there for several months.
The latter happened quite a lot from about 1993 - and the government did not recover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The December 1981 figure of Conservatives on 23% was dreadful, but was perhaps the point when the SDP really took off.<br />
The Crosby by-election was in late November, and although the savage recession actually ended several months earlier, no-one would have believed it at the time. Also, inflation was still a problem and interest rates had to go back up.</p>
<p>And that 24% figure in August 1985 was a Gallup poll, and they had some outdated methods which were revised at the end of 1996, suddenly reducing 40 point Labour leads to around 18.</p>
<p>I think there is a difference between hitting a dire figure like 25 or 23 per cent on a few slightly freakish occasions, and settling there for several months.<br />
The latter happened quite a lot from about 1993 &#8211; and the government did not recover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1897/comment-page-1#comment-549764</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1897#comment-549764</guid>
		<description>Anthony,

&quot;Sheesh - there is no point arguing about it.&quot;

Somebody is grumpy tonight.........

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony,</p>
<p>&#8220;Sheesh &#8211; there is no point arguing about it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Somebody is grumpy tonight&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
