<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More from ICM&#8217;s Guardian poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1833/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1833</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Benson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1833/comment-page-1#comment-543295</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1833#comment-543295</guid>
		<description>Osbak
You obviously have become the self imposed regulator of who is partisan and who is not depending on your own view point

&quot;I really do no see how we can have a shread of confidence in the Prime Minister anymore and i`m not sure how long he can last at this rate&quot;

You fail to mention the largely unpartisan thread of the post just picking out one sentence is something I would expect from GB and DC at PMQ`s 

I was merely expressing lack of confidence in the PM which has been with us for sometime even in his own ranks                                                                                   That is not good for the country as a whole at this time and has been brought to our attention through a most of the polls over the last 14 months or so 

Check out Labour home it will keep you busy ticking off the partisan posters there!! (just kidding Osbak dont go there)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Osbak<br />
You obviously have become the self imposed regulator of who is partisan and who is not depending on your own view point</p>
<p>&#8220;I really do no see how we can have a shread of confidence in the Prime Minister anymore and i`m not sure how long he can last at this rate&#8221;</p>
<p>You fail to mention the largely unpartisan thread of the post just picking out one sentence is something I would expect from GB and DC at PMQ`s </p>
<p>I was merely expressing lack of confidence in the PM which has been with us for sometime even in his own ranks                                                                                   That is not good for the country as a whole at this time and has been brought to our attention through a most of the polls over the last 14 months or so </p>
<p>Check out Labour home it will keep you busy ticking off the partisan posters there!! (just kidding Osbak dont go there)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keir</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1833/comment-page-1#comment-543179</link>
		<dc:creator>Keir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1833#comment-543179</guid>
		<description>Some psyche 101 off topic and not partisan (I hope): - 

We usually use insults for other people which we feel will hurt them most, but this is based on our own opinion of what would hurt us.

For example people call others fat who themselves have either low self esteem or are fat. 

It makes PMQ’s more interesting for both parties

Maybe Gordon is scared that doing nothing is the thing percieved oppinion of himself?

David could be worried about people linking past economic failures to him and his team?

Please take this further, the method work (simple as it is). Maybe it’s something worth exploiting in the months ahead. I wonder if the electorate will catch on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some psyche 101 off topic and not partisan (I hope): &#8211; </p>
<p>We usually use insults for other people which we feel will hurt them most, but this is based on our own opinion of what would hurt us.</p>
<p>For example people call others fat who themselves have either low self esteem or are fat. </p>
<p>It makes PMQ’s more interesting for both parties</p>
<p>Maybe Gordon is scared that doing nothing is the thing percieved oppinion of himself?</p>
<p>David could be worried about people linking past economic failures to him and his team?</p>
<p>Please take this further, the method work (simple as it is). Maybe it’s something worth exploiting in the months ahead. I wonder if the electorate will catch on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1833/comment-page-1#comment-543178</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1833#comment-543178</guid>
		<description>I think Labour have sorted their own finances out a little since then.  It is true that they were on the verge of going to the unions with begging bowls for more funds, which would have been disasterous for the country as government policy would become even more trade unionist.  However, I dont think they are in such a bad way any more.

In terms of fighting elections, Labour will pretty much always have the funds because they can go to the trade unions if they are a bit short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Labour have sorted their own finances out a little since then.  It is true that they were on the verge of going to the unions with begging bowls for more funds, which would have been disasterous for the country as government policy would become even more trade unionist.  However, I dont think they are in such a bad way any more.</p>
<p>In terms of fighting elections, Labour will pretty much always have the funds because they can go to the trade unions if they are a bit short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynosarges</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1833/comment-page-1#comment-543171</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynosarges</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1833#comment-543171</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the current state of the Labour party finances?

Last year, there were questions raised (I don&#039;t know how seriously) as to whether the auditors would refuse to sign off their accounts.  If the SNP force a Scottish election, will the Labour party be able to fight it, the Euro elections, local elections and a general election within 18 months?  And if not, what will give?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the current state of the Labour party finances?</p>
<p>Last year, there were questions raised (I don&#8217;t know how seriously) as to whether the auditors would refuse to sign off their accounts.  If the SNP force a Scottish election, will the Labour party be able to fight it, the Euro elections, local elections and a general election within 18 months?  And if not, what will give?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1833/comment-page-1#comment-543149</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1833#comment-543149</guid>
		<description>Brown should stop talking  on TV because :-

a) He is somewhat unpopular.
b)His credibility is poor.

He should go into purdah &amp; not come out until he has some measurable, credible, independently attested achievement to tell us about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brown should stop talking  on TV because :-</p>
<p>a) He is somewhat unpopular.<br />
b)His credibility is poor.</p>
<p>He should go into purdah &amp; not come out until he has some measurable, credible, independently attested achievement to tell us about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

