<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First post-PBR poll shows a 4 point Tory lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1703/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1703</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:29:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolf</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1703/comment-page-1#comment-526117</link>
		<dc:creator>wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1703#comment-526117</guid>
		<description>Where are all the Tory Shadow Cabinet.? Vince Cable works ten times as hard as any of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are all the Tory Shadow Cabinet.? Vince Cable works ten times as hard as any of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francesco Costa &#187; links for 2008-11-26</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1703/comment-page-1#comment-526033</link>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Costa &#187; links for 2008-11-26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1703#comment-526033</guid>
		<description>[...] UK Polling Report » First post-PBR poll shows a 4 point Tory lead Attenzione: Gordon Brown sta rimontando su David Cameron [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UK Polling Report » First post-PBR poll shows a 4 point Tory lead Attenzione: Gordon Brown sta rimontando su David Cameron [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1703/comment-page-1#comment-525878</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1703#comment-525878</guid>
		<description>Andy D: &quot;the parties were more or less neck and neck the year before Mrs. Thatcher came to power&quot; - true, but Labour had at that point lost it&#039;s majority. As Anthony has pointed out, Govts with healthy majorities are rarely replaced with new Govts with healthy majorities of their own - the Conservatives still have a 60 seat majority to overcome before going into hung parliament territory, a much steeper hill to climb than Mrs Thatcher faced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy D: &#8220;the parties were more or less neck and neck the year before Mrs. Thatcher came to power&#8221; &#8211; true, but Labour had at that point lost it&#8217;s majority. As Anthony has pointed out, Govts with healthy majorities are rarely replaced with new Govts with healthy majorities of their own &#8211; the Conservatives still have a 60 seat majority to overcome before going into hung parliament territory, a much steeper hill to climb than Mrs Thatcher faced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1703/comment-page-1#comment-525861</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1703#comment-525861</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yes the Tories are still over 40% but shouldn’t they be running away with it at this stage? At this point in 1995 Labour had leads of between 17 and 40%.&quot;

That is true, but then the parties were more or less neck and neck the year before Mrs. Thatcher came to power.

Could I ask a question: why on earth wasn&#039;t this YouGov poll published this Thursday night, as they are usually published on the last Friday of the month in the Daily Telegraph - surely that would have been more meaningful and would have shown us more of a reaction for or against the PBR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yes the Tories are still over 40% but shouldn’t they be running away with it at this stage? At this point in 1995 Labour had leads of between 17 and 40%.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is true, but then the parties were more or less neck and neck the year before Mrs. Thatcher came to power.</p>
<p>Could I ask a question: why on earth wasn&#8217;t this YouGov poll published this Thursday night, as they are usually published on the last Friday of the month in the Daily Telegraph &#8211; surely that would have been more meaningful and would have shown us more of a reaction for or against the PBR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NigelJ</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1703/comment-page-1#comment-525846</link>
		<dc:creator>NigelJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1703#comment-525846</guid>
		<description>Anthony: I think I am right in saying that there is normally an immediate bounce for labour immediately after a PBR or budget, as many still like the idea of the chancellor spashing other peoples cash. however it normally returns to earth within a couple of weeks as people realise it isn&#039;t all that it seems. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony: I think I am right in saying that there is normally an immediate bounce for labour immediately after a PBR or budget, as many still like the idea of the chancellor spashing other peoples cash. however it normally returns to earth within a couple of weeks as people realise it isn&#8217;t all that it seems. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

