<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 79% think tax cuts now will be paid for later</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1697/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1697</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Charlesworth</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1697/comment-page-1#comment-525494</link>
		<dc:creator>John Charlesworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1697#comment-525494</guid>
		<description>We should be concerned that we are loading debts onto future generations. Far more than our prdecessors imposed on us.  College kids here are saying that ever more loudly. I hope this will induce them to get more involved in politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should be concerned that we are loading debts onto future generations. Far more than our prdecessors imposed on us.  College kids here are saying that ever more loudly. I hope this will induce them to get more involved in politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair Cameron</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1697/comment-page-1#comment-525463</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1697#comment-525463</guid>
		<description>I just looked at the CIA one. Interesting to see countries like Norway so high.... i would have assumed it was in the lower half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked at the CIA one. Interesting to see countries like Norway so high&#8230;. i would have assumed it was in the lower half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wheeler (Lab)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1697/comment-page-1#comment-525442</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wheeler (Lab)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 15:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1697#comment-525442</guid>
		<description>Thanks Simon/Anthony - that&#039;s a really interesting site.  Enough to keep a geek like me occupied for hours.

If anyone&#039;s interested a table comparing government debt is here:-

http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/vl=819855/cl=17/nw=1/rpsv/factbook/100102-g1.htm

but it&#039;s from 2006 so it&#039;s a bit out of date.

There&#039;s also:-

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html

Which is lightly more up to date (2007).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Simon/Anthony &#8211; that&#8217;s a really interesting site.  Enough to keep a geek like me occupied for hours.</p>
<p>If anyone&#8217;s interested a table comparing government debt is here:-</p>
<p><a href="http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/vl=819855/cl=17/nw=1/rpsv/factbook/100102-g1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://lysander.sourceoecd.org/vl=819855/cl=17/nw=1/rpsv/factbook/100102-g1.htm</a></p>
<p>but it&#8217;s from 2006 so it&#8217;s a bit out of date.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also:-</p>
<p><a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2186rank.html</a></p>
<p>Which is lightly more up to date (2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1697/comment-page-1#comment-525425</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1697#comment-525425</guid>
		<description>&quot;Does anyone believe the Treasury’s figures on future debt? 118 million next year ? No way. More like 150 million.&quot;

Most comment I have seen &amp; read concentrates on the key assumption-that we will come out of recession in the second half of 2009 &amp; return to 3% growth in 2010.

There are also assumptions about tax revenue volumes which seem to be the subject of concern.

Brown consistently underestimated his annual deficits &amp; therefore borrowing.

By the way I wish the Press would distinguish between Annual Deficit &amp; Cumulative Borrowing.

PBR assumes a doubling of current Cumultive Borrowing from around £550bn to £1trillion by 2015.

It is only then that Cumulative Borrowing will begin to be repaid-so despite the delayed tax increases we will still be running Annual Deficits for at least the next 7 years .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Does anyone believe the Treasury’s figures on future debt? 118 million next year ? No way. More like 150 million.&#8221;</p>
<p>Most comment I have seen &amp; read concentrates on the key assumption-that we will come out of recession in the second half of 2009 &amp; return to 3% growth in 2010.</p>
<p>There are also assumptions about tax revenue volumes which seem to be the subject of concern.</p>
<p>Brown consistently underestimated his annual deficits &amp; therefore borrowing.</p>
<p>By the way I wish the Press would distinguish between Annual Deficit &amp; Cumulative Borrowing.</p>
<p>PBR assumes a doubling of current Cumultive Borrowing from around £550bn to £1trillion by 2015.</p>
<p>It is only then that Cumulative Borrowing will begin to be repaid-so despite the delayed tax increases we will still be running Annual Deficits for at least the next 7 years .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair Cameron</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1697/comment-page-1#comment-525419</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1697#comment-525419</guid>
		<description>Steve Wheeler, there is a useful graph on the BBC which shows some actual data:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7746642.stm

As you can see the UK is far from the worst debtor in Europe (one should not include Northern Rock as these assets are valable and are paying returns). Furthermore, although the £118 billion will put the borrowing level very high, it is not a much higher percentage of GDP than in 1993, and is forecast to fall further. The real gamble seems to be how quickly the economy can recover...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Wheeler, there is a useful graph on the BBC which shows some actual data:</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7746642.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7746642.stm</a></p>
<p>As you can see the UK is far from the worst debtor in Europe (one should not include Northern Rock as these assets are valable and are paying returns). Furthermore, although the £118 billion will put the borrowing level very high, it is not a much higher percentage of GDP than in 1993, and is forecast to fall further. The real gamble seems to be how quickly the economy can recover&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

