<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Populus show lowest Tory lead since April</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1628/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1628</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:38:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warren</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1628/comment-page-3#comment-521071</link>
		<dc:creator>Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1628#comment-521071</guid>
		<description>Anthony - printed cards from the Ntl Fed of Sub-Postmasters. Not of the same weight as personal/individual letters, agreed, but numbers would suggest a strength of feeling on the issue. It may not be that significant - though it affects the older section of the electorate disproportionately and they ote in greater numbers - but it&#039;s one less stick to beat the govt with.

Peter - agree that once the PO was made a business rather than a public service (was that a Conservative or Labour govt decision?) things were bound to become difficult for low-volume sub POs. I take yesterday&#039;s decision to be an indication that the Govt is looking to route many services through local POs as people do still see them as a public/community resource rather than a business like a local branch of Greggs the baker or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony &#8211; printed cards from the Ntl Fed of Sub-Postmasters. Not of the same weight as personal/individual letters, agreed, but numbers would suggest a strength of feeling on the issue. It may not be that significant &#8211; though it affects the older section of the electorate disproportionately and they ote in greater numbers &#8211; but it&#8217;s one less stick to beat the govt with.</p>
<p>Peter &#8211; agree that once the PO was made a business rather than a public service (was that a Conservative or Labour govt decision?) things were bound to become difficult for low-volume sub POs. I take yesterday&#8217;s decision to be an indication that the Govt is looking to route many services through local POs as people do still see them as a public/community resource rather than a business like a local branch of Greggs the baker or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1628/comment-page-3#comment-521070</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1628#comment-521070</guid>
		<description>No, they can&#039;t, since this isn&#039;t the site for that sort of partisan argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, they can&#8217;t, since this isn&#8217;t the site for that sort of partisan argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Keene</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1628/comment-page-3#comment-521067</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Keene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 13:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1628#comment-521067</guid>
		<description>Before Labour bloggers finish rewriting the history books could one of them just answer the following questions about their hero&#039;s performance

1 Who ignored the debt spiral as it built up?

2 Who weakened regulation and allowed Northern Rock to offer 125 per cent mortgages?

3 Who diminished Bank of England control over our banking system?

4 Who wrecked final salary pensions with a 5 billion pound a year levy?

5 Who ignored the risks of the house price and equity boom?

...and I have&#039;nt even mentioned the gold reserves....

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before Labour bloggers finish rewriting the history books could one of them just answer the following questions about their hero&#8217;s performance</p>
<p>1 Who ignored the debt spiral as it built up?</p>
<p>2 Who weakened regulation and allowed Northern Rock to offer 125 per cent mortgages?</p>
<p>3 Who diminished Bank of England control over our banking system?</p>
<p>4 Who wrecked final salary pensions with a 5 billion pound a year levy?</p>
<p>5 Who ignored the risks of the house price and equity boom?</p>
<p>&#8230;and I have&#8217;nt even mentioned the gold reserves&#8230;.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1628/comment-page-3#comment-521011</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1628#comment-521011</guid>
		<description>Having been for a while PO spokesperson for highland council and having overseen the closures the situation is pretty dire.

Basically once the decision was made to put the PO on to a commercial footing the righting was on the wall. Those who depend on the post office most don&#039;t tend to have much spending power so unless it is subsidised or finds new business it is in trouble.

the Highlands is particularly difficult as we have lots of very small offices many run be retired people almost as a community service. In some cases they use their pension to subsidies the business and when they go so does the PO. A real underlying issue has been unplanned closures where people throw in the towel and no one wants the business.

A friend of mine closed his last year and was delighted to do so as since the loss of benefits he had spent the last five years working harder every year for less money.  When he was doing council tax payments over the counter less than 10% of what PO Ltd charged the council went to him which meant that even without Overheads and NI it was impossible to do enough transactions to cover the minimum wage.

Since closure he&#039;s had the first full holiday of ever a week in four years and spend his time doing relief work in other PO&#039;s. He doesn&#039;t have the pressure or work as long hours, but his income has gone up.

I remember being in a debate almost seven years ago in the Council when the benefits changes were being discussed and calling for PO&#039;s to be allowed to offer independent financial advice in the wake of miss selling. Now we seem to be getting that form Lord Yacht.

Unless the government makes the choice to turn PO&#039;s into the service deliver point for all state agencies, Local government NHS benefits and payments it just won&#039;t generate the income needed to sustain a network. 

As long as each government department or agency is allowed to make it&#039;s own narrow commercial  decisions about providers without any over arching policy the PO will continue to leach business.

This should be a central issue in the next general election but unless the public push all parties (including my own) for a definitive plan for the future of the PO, the problems will just continue to fester.

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been for a while PO spokesperson for highland council and having overseen the closures the situation is pretty dire.</p>
<p>Basically once the decision was made to put the PO on to a commercial footing the righting was on the wall. Those who depend on the post office most don&#8217;t tend to have much spending power so unless it is subsidised or finds new business it is in trouble.</p>
<p>the Highlands is particularly difficult as we have lots of very small offices many run be retired people almost as a community service. In some cases they use their pension to subsidies the business and when they go so does the PO. A real underlying issue has been unplanned closures where people throw in the towel and no one wants the business.</p>
<p>A friend of mine closed his last year and was delighted to do so as since the loss of benefits he had spent the last five years working harder every year for less money.  When he was doing council tax payments over the counter less than 10% of what PO Ltd charged the council went to him which meant that even without Overheads and NI it was impossible to do enough transactions to cover the minimum wage.</p>
<p>Since closure he&#8217;s had the first full holiday of ever a week in four years and spend his time doing relief work in other PO&#8217;s. He doesn&#8217;t have the pressure or work as long hours, but his income has gone up.</p>
<p>I remember being in a debate almost seven years ago in the Council when the benefits changes were being discussed and calling for PO&#8217;s to be allowed to offer independent financial advice in the wake of miss selling. Now we seem to be getting that form Lord Yacht.</p>
<p>Unless the government makes the choice to turn PO&#8217;s into the service deliver point for all state agencies, Local government NHS benefits and payments it just won&#8217;t generate the income needed to sustain a network. </p>
<p>As long as each government department or agency is allowed to make it&#8217;s own narrow commercial  decisions about providers without any over arching policy the PO will continue to leach business.</p>
<p>This should be a central issue in the next general election but unless the public push all parties (including my own) for a definitive plan for the future of the PO, the problems will just continue to fester.</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1628/comment-page-3#comment-520985</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1628#comment-520985</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it would be practical to re-open closed ones, the sub-postmasters will already have got their compensation and moved on. The ones it would rescue would be those that are under threat of closure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it would be practical to re-open closed ones, the sub-postmasters will already have got their compensation and moved on. The ones it would rescue would be those that are under threat of closure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

