<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ComRes September Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430</link>
	<description>Independent Survey and Polling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:26:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KTL</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-498212</link>
		<dc:creator>KTL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-498212</guid>
		<description>Can Brown afford to demote Milliband ?

Just like Blair could not sack or demote Brown - isn&#039;t the same true about Brown and Milliband. If Milliband were demoted he would almost certainly resign and then go looking for 70 signatures on a leadership ballot form which he may not have trouble getting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Brown afford to demote Milliband ?</p>
<p>Just like Blair could not sack or demote Brown &#8211; isn&#8217;t the same true about Brown and Milliband. If Milliband were demoted he would almost certainly resign and then go looking for 70 signatures on a leadership ballot form which he may not have trouble getting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-498179</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-498179</guid>
		<description>Thomas I assume you are referring in your first para. to the Conservatives and the LD&#039;s. In practice their Glenrothes figures are likely to have minimal impact on whether a bad result for Labour is the end for Brown given it is generally accepted it is predominantly a 2 party fight and it would be surprising if one/both of the other 2 parties are not squeezed. I think that Labour could lose Glenrothes badly and Brown would still hang on until at least next Summer. 

I agree with what you say about Brown demoting Miliband but doubt if Brown has the guts to do it. I think you are under estimating Cameron and think Brown will suffer in a full blown recession as he has no room to meaningfully use fiscal policy without adverse political consequences from e.g. a Sterling crises, a down - grading of the UK&#039;s credit rating and much more criticism from the IMF etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas I assume you are referring in your first para. to the Conservatives and the LD&#8217;s. In practice their Glenrothes figures are likely to have minimal impact on whether a bad result for Labour is the end for Brown given it is generally accepted it is predominantly a 2 party fight and it would be surprising if one/both of the other 2 parties are not squeezed. I think that Labour could lose Glenrothes badly and Brown would still hang on until at least next Summer. </p>
<p>I agree with what you say about Brown demoting Miliband but doubt if Brown has the guts to do it. I think you are under estimating Cameron and think Brown will suffer in a full blown recession as he has no room to meaningfully use fiscal policy without adverse political consequences from e.g. a Sterling crises, a down &#8211; grading of the UK&#8217;s credit rating and much more criticism from the IMF etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-498150</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-498150</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure whether a Glenrothes by-election loss for Labour is the end for Brown. It will at least partly depend on the extent to which Conservatives and Tories see their votes hold up in what is otherwise a two-way fight.

I&#039;m also not convinced that a full-blown recession is bad for Brown. I am not satisfied that Cameron and Osborne would do any better in the current situation, so why should I give them a chance? They have yet to explain what they would do differently, and the few gimmicks they have presented do not fill me with any confidence.

JJB is right that the coming reshuffle will be a good indicator of the feeling inside the cabinet, as overextensive and drastic changes would smack of panic. 

I think Brown should shame Miliband&#039;s conspiring by demoting him, and it would show some backbone to stick with Darling for a bit longer.

The interesting thing will be the timing of the announcement and how this plays into what I&#039;m expecting to be a lower bounce in the polls for Cameron coming out of the Conservative conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether a Glenrothes by-election loss for Labour is the end for Brown. It will at least partly depend on the extent to which Conservatives and Tories see their votes hold up in what is otherwise a two-way fight.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not convinced that a full-blown recession is bad for Brown. I am not satisfied that Cameron and Osborne would do any better in the current situation, so why should I give them a chance? They have yet to explain what they would do differently, and the few gimmicks they have presented do not fill me with any confidence.</p>
<p>JJB is right that the coming reshuffle will be a good indicator of the feeling inside the cabinet, as overextensive and drastic changes would smack of panic. </p>
<p>I think Brown should shame Miliband&#8217;s conspiring by demoting him, and it would show some backbone to stick with Darling for a bit longer.</p>
<p>The interesting thing will be the timing of the announcement and how this plays into what I&#8217;m expecting to be a lower bounce in the polls for Cameron coming out of the Conservative conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James B</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-498069</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 15:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-498069</guid>
		<description>Surely they can&#039;t really be going to put Alistair Darling in the Home Office, as it hinted in The Economist.

If David Milliband is sacked, then Jacqui Smith could make a fairly smooth transition to Foreign Secretary.

Not so good, would be Anne Moffat as Chancellor of the Exchequer, but it would make more sense for Yvette Cooper to take that and have Moffat as Chief Secretary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely they can&#8217;t really be going to put Alistair Darling in the Home Office, as it hinted in The Economist.</p>
<p>If David Milliband is sacked, then Jacqui Smith could make a fairly smooth transition to Foreign Secretary.</p>
<p>Not so good, would be Anne Moffat as Chancellor of the Exchequer, but it would make more sense for Yvette Cooper to take that and have Moffat as Chief Secretary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunbeam</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-497975</link>
		<dc:creator>sunbeam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 13:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-497975</guid>
		<description>People are far too concerned about what the next couple of polls will be. We have not reached the watershed moment. That is still a few weeks away. 

Two key events are still to come. 

One is when people stop talking about the &#039;credit crunch&#039; (a phrase not too harmful for Labour) and start to talk about the &#039;recession&#039;. The word &#039;recession&#039; has far more impact and will cause more harm to Brown. 

The second moment is Glenrothes. If Labour loses, especially badly, then GB may be in real trouble. He&#039;s been clever with the &#039;experience&#039; argument as it hinders his removal. 

Even if he stays a by-election defeat will kill his momentum and return us to 20% Tory leads just as we offically slip in to recession. 

That will be the water-shed moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People are far too concerned about what the next couple of polls will be. We have not reached the watershed moment. That is still a few weeks away. </p>
<p>Two key events are still to come. </p>
<p>One is when people stop talking about the &#8216;credit crunch&#8217; (a phrase not too harmful for Labour) and start to talk about the &#8216;recession&#8217;. The word &#8216;recession&#8217; has far more impact and will cause more harm to Brown. </p>
<p>The second moment is Glenrothes. If Labour loses, especially badly, then GB may be in real trouble. He&#8217;s been clever with the &#8216;experience&#8217; argument as it hinders his removal. </p>
<p>Even if he stays a by-election defeat will kill his momentum and return us to 20% Tory leads just as we offically slip in to recession. </p>
<p>That will be the water-shed moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Wheeler (Lab)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-497940</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Wheeler (Lab)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-497940</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget the Iraq announcement during the Tory&#039;s conference.  I know it&#039;s not scientific but an awful lot of my mates have mentioned that as the reason they went off Labour.  I&#039;m not commenting on whether I think it was a deliberate idea by Brown or just very bad timing but I certainly think it had a big effect on public perception.

I notice that Cameron started his speech talking about the armed forces.  I could be wrong but I can&#039;t remember Brown saying much.  Does that mean the Conservatives think they&#039;re stronger in this area now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget the Iraq announcement during the Tory&#8217;s conference.  I know it&#8217;s not scientific but an awful lot of my mates have mentioned that as the reason they went off Labour.  I&#8217;m not commenting on whether I think it was a deliberate idea by Brown or just very bad timing but I certainly think it had a big effect on public perception.</p>
<p>I notice that Cameron started his speech talking about the armed forces.  I could be wrong but I can&#8217;t remember Brown saying much.  Does that mean the Conservatives think they&#8217;re stronger in this area now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-497852</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 10:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-497852</guid>
		<description>My guess is that &quot;events&quot; supercede Party Conferences in their effect on peoples voting intention/Polling responses.

My guess is that Brown&#039;s incredible statement that the Polls were not a factor in changeing his mind to call an Election, was a greater factor in his fall from grace,than Cameron&#039;s 2007 speech-good as that speech was.

My guess is that current financial &amp; economic events will similarly supercede the effect of Cameron&#039;s speech-good that speech was (IMPO)

But I don&#039;t know which way current financial concerns will sway people.

In USA it seems to be towards the opposition.
In UK it seems to be towards the Government.

But the GE will probably be in 2010-when events, Conference Speeches, and no doubt policies will all have changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that &#8220;events&#8221; supercede Party Conferences in their effect on peoples voting intention/Polling responses.</p>
<p>My guess is that Brown&#8217;s incredible statement that the Polls were not a factor in changeing his mind to call an Election, was a greater factor in his fall from grace,than Cameron&#8217;s 2007 speech-good as that speech was.</p>
<p>My guess is that current financial &amp; economic events will similarly supercede the effect of Cameron&#8217;s speech-good that speech was (IMPO)</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t know which way current financial concerns will sway people.</p>
<p>In USA it seems to be towards the opposition.<br />
In UK it seems to be towards the Government.</p>
<p>But the GE will probably be in 2010-when events, Conference Speeches, and no doubt policies will all have changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john t t</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-497825</link>
		<dc:creator>john t t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-497825</guid>
		<description>Laban - you aren&#039;t at all off topic, given Cameron&#039;s reference to Thatcher as the change candidate in 1979.

I found the Tory conference fascinating simply because of the venue. It seemed to have been chosen for the celebration type of conference that should (deservedly) result from a massive turnaround in the polls. 

The fact that all the big speeches were re-written (and presumably largely stripped of oratorical flourish) meant that the mutedness of the performances was stark.

At his best, Cameron is a small venue performer. A huge speech in a huge venue could easily have re-established that 20 point lead. I&#039;m not sticking my neck out, but I&#039;d suggest any rebound will be smaller for the fact that the venue was no longer helping him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laban &#8211; you aren&#8217;t at all off topic, given Cameron&#8217;s reference to Thatcher as the change candidate in 1979.</p>
<p>I found the Tory conference fascinating simply because of the venue. It seemed to have been chosen for the celebration type of conference that should (deservedly) result from a massive turnaround in the polls. </p>
<p>The fact that all the big speeches were re-written (and presumably largely stripped of oratorical flourish) meant that the mutedness of the performances was stark.</p>
<p>At his best, Cameron is a small venue performer. A huge speech in a huge venue could easily have re-established that 20 point lead. I&#8217;m not sticking my neck out, but I&#8217;d suggest any rebound will be smaller for the fact that the venue was no longer helping him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-497779</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-497779</guid>
		<description>Philip J W - actually, people don&#039;t have the &lt;b&gt;right&lt;/b&gt; to express those views &lt;b&gt;here&lt;/b&gt;. They have to right to express them in general, but this is my website, hosted on a server I pay for. Only I have the right to say what I want on here (within the terms of service of my service provider), the rest of you can damn well follow my comments policy, which Barnaby is rightly defending. 

It isn&#039;t place for non-partisan discussion because Barnaby likes non-partisan discussion; it&#039;s a place for non-partisan discussion because I make the rules and I say so.

That said, a post exploring the reasons why Labour support dropped in Sept 07 isn&#039;t partisan, it&#039;s exactly the sort of post the site is for. 

That said, your reasons don&#039;t stand up. Labour&#039;s support slumped before the Queen&#039;s speech - the timing suggests it was a result of the humiliating non-election and Brown&#039;s handling of it, the media turning against Brown after his honeymoon and - some people would claim - a successful Conservative conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philip J W &#8211; actually, people don&#8217;t have the <b>right</b> to express those views <b>here</b>. They have to right to express them in general, but this is my website, hosted on a server I pay for. Only I have the right to say what I want on here (within the terms of service of my service provider), the rest of you can damn well follow my comments policy, which Barnaby is rightly defending. </p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t place for non-partisan discussion because Barnaby likes non-partisan discussion; it&#8217;s a place for non-partisan discussion because I make the rules and I say so.</p>
<p>That said, a post exploring the reasons why Labour support dropped in Sept 07 isn&#8217;t partisan, it&#8217;s exactly the sort of post the site is for. </p>
<p>That said, your reasons don&#8217;t stand up. Labour&#8217;s support slumped before the Queen&#8217;s speech &#8211; the timing suggests it was a result of the humiliating non-election and Brown&#8217;s handling of it, the media turning against Brown after his honeymoon and &#8211; some people would claim &#8211; a successful Conservative conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barnaby Marder</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1430/comment-page-1#comment-497738</link>
		<dc:creator>Barnaby Marder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1430#comment-497738</guid>
		<description>Of course not. Nobody deserted the Labour Party a year ago because somebody from Richmond thought that a site about polling shouldn&#039;t be replete with partisan comments cheerleading their own party, or hating another party. The reasons were quite different. It started with Gordon Brown&#039;s dithering about calling the election, carried on with a combination of bad economic news and generally rudderless leadership (with maybe a touch of arrogance thrown in), and culminated in the terrible error of abolishing the 10p tax band. If there is indeed the start of a perhaps small Labour recovery - and it isn&#039;t at all clear yet whether that&#039;s the case - it would be because the Government is showing signs of more decisive leadership, and has regained something of a sense of purpose. I don&#039;t think I&#039;m being unreasonable in wishing for analysis of the polls which appear rather than wanting to read why someone hates the Labour, Conservative or some other party. The idea that Labour went down the pan because one of its members has a vision of what a decent blog about psephology should be like is quite ridiculous, however you dress it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course not. Nobody deserted the Labour Party a year ago because somebody from Richmond thought that a site about polling shouldn&#8217;t be replete with partisan comments cheerleading their own party, or hating another party. The reasons were quite different. It started with Gordon Brown&#8217;s dithering about calling the election, carried on with a combination of bad economic news and generally rudderless leadership (with maybe a touch of arrogance thrown in), and culminated in the terrible error of abolishing the 10p tax band. If there is indeed the start of a perhaps small Labour recovery &#8211; and it isn&#8217;t at all clear yet whether that&#8217;s the case &#8211; it would be because the Government is showing signs of more decisive leadership, and has regained something of a sense of purpose. I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m being unreasonable in wishing for analysis of the polls which appear rather than wanting to read why someone hates the Labour, Conservative or some other party. The idea that Labour went down the pan because one of its members has a vision of what a decent blog about psephology should be like is quite ridiculous, however you dress it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
