<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labour and SNP neck-and-neck in Glenrothes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1417/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1417</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B Dick</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1417/comment-page-1#comment-492253</link>
		<dc:creator>John B Dick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1417#comment-492253</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’d be looking for something better and different from Labours new Scottish leader, but that assumes that he is in a position to set the campaign agenda.&quot; 

Why make that assumption? we would know if there had been any change in the organisational structure. 

Without such a change there can be no hope of progress. The position can only attract an authoritarian who NEEDS to follow a leader. Loyalty is more highly valued than winning. Google &quot;Bob Altemeyer: The Authoritarians&quot; to find out why.

&quot;So far it looks like labour will just repeat the mistakes of Glasgow East.&quot;

So what&#039;s fresh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d be looking for something better and different from Labours new Scottish leader, but that assumes that he is in a position to set the campaign agenda.&#8221; </p>
<p>Why make that assumption? we would know if there had been any change in the organisational structure. </p>
<p>Without such a change there can be no hope of progress. The position can only attract an authoritarian who NEEDS to follow a leader. Loyalty is more highly valued than winning. Google &#8220;Bob Altemeyer: The Authoritarians&#8221; to find out why.</p>
<p>&#8220;So far it looks like labour will just repeat the mistakes of Glasgow East.&#8221;</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s fresh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1417/comment-page-1#comment-489991</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1417#comment-489991</guid>
		<description>I watched it live.
I read the press comment on-line.
I watched the Adam Bolton Interview.

I was responding to Nick&#039;s post-not yours john.

I agree that it will take more than one speech to change the momentum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched it live.<br />
I read the press comment on-line.<br />
I watched the Adam Bolton Interview.</p>
<p>I was responding to Nick&#8217;s post-not yours john.</p>
<p>I agree that it will take more than one speech to change the momentum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john t t</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1417/comment-page-1#comment-489852</link>
		<dc:creator>john t t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1417#comment-489852</guid>
		<description>It was widely regarde as a &quot;good&quot; speech, including Ruth Kelly- if you missed the good bits, you should read it or look it up where you can hear it. 

My point was that it will take more than a good speech to change the momentum. Non-partisan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was widely regarde as a &#8220;good&#8221; speech, including Ruth Kelly- if you missed the good bits, you should read it or look it up where you can hear it. </p>
<p>My point was that it will take more than a good speech to change the momentum. Non-partisan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolf</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1417/comment-page-1#comment-489846</link>
		<dc:creator>wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1417#comment-489846</guid>
		<description>The papers gave the impression Sarah Brown would do a better job than her husband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The papers gave the impression Sarah Brown would do a better job than her husband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1417/comment-page-1#comment-489786</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1417#comment-489786</guid>
		<description>&quot;a good speech&quot;

Good by what yardstick?

Unison is very happy with it-&quot;clear red water&quot; at last they say.

The delegates seemed happy with it.

Did Ruth Kelly think it &quot;good&quot; before announcing her resignation from Cabinet, at  3 the following morning?

The papers seem full of stuff about Gordon&#039;s little porkies-why does he do that? 

I think the speech was only &quot;good&quot; for the Conservatives.That GB has started to attack them in the only way he knows how provides ample scope for  forensic rebuttal.

The focus -and pressure-is now on Cameron &amp; his team.

The post Conference Polls will tell the real story about how &quot;good&quot; all these speeches were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a good speech&#8221;</p>
<p>Good by what yardstick?</p>
<p>Unison is very happy with it-&#8221;clear red water&#8221; at last they say.</p>
<p>The delegates seemed happy with it.</p>
<p>Did Ruth Kelly think it &#8220;good&#8221; before announcing her resignation from Cabinet, at  3 the following morning?</p>
<p>The papers seem full of stuff about Gordon&#8217;s little porkies-why does he do that? </p>
<p>I think the speech was only &#8220;good&#8221; for the Conservatives.That GB has started to attack them in the only way he knows how provides ample scope for  forensic rebuttal.</p>
<p>The focus -and pressure-is now on Cameron &amp; his team.</p>
<p>The post Conference Polls will tell the real story about how &#8220;good&#8221; all these speeches were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

