<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No change from Populus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1359/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1359</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:49:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1359/comment-page-2#comment-477968</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1359#comment-477968</guid>
		<description>In addition as 8% of government revenue comes from Scotland, then 8% of the amount given out in CTB throughout the UK comes from Scots, including that given out in NI where they still have rates, but can get relief. 

If Scotland introduces LIT and doesn&#039;t get money back, then Scottish tax payers will be contributing to the UK cost of CTB but not able to recieve it. 

Not only is that not particularly fair, but to advocate it would be electoral suicide for Labour.

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In addition as 8% of government revenue comes from Scotland, then 8% of the amount given out in CTB throughout the UK comes from Scots, including that given out in NI where they still have rates, but can get relief. </p>
<p>If Scotland introduces LIT and doesn&#8217;t get money back, then Scottish tax payers will be contributing to the UK cost of CTB but not able to recieve it. </p>
<p>Not only is that not particularly fair, but to advocate it would be electoral suicide for Labour.</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil C</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1359/comment-page-2#comment-477880</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1359#comment-477880</guid>
		<description>Fluffy Thoughts, surely it&#039;s easy?

Currently 400 million is given to Scottish local authorities so that they don&#039;t have to charge poor people council tax.  If LIT is introduced it should go to the Scottish Govt for exactly the same reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fluffy Thoughts, surely it&#8217;s easy?</p>
<p>Currently 400 million is given to Scottish local authorities so that they don&#8217;t have to charge poor people council tax.  If LIT is introduced it should go to the Scottish Govt for exactly the same reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1359/comment-page-2#comment-477868</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 17:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1359#comment-477868</guid>
		<description>&quot;I suspect, however that most local voters vote for whichever national party they dislike least - and that is why I’m not sure about the “local democracy” values.&quot;

Under the SNP proposal that&#039;s just what I would do.

The way to restore real local democracy in UK is to give more &amp; effective powers to locally elected councils -and make them responsible for raising more of their budgets themselves-not less as in this proposal.

At present-you are right-Party Groups spend locally according to centrally dictated priorities &amp; rules.A large part of their income is doled out by Whitehall-who decide who gets what.
Local Councillors are little more than ciphers &amp; might as well have all their revenues raised by the Central Government via a Central Income Tax Surcharge -as proposed by SNP.

&quot;No taxation without representation&quot; has always seemed to me to  be a sound principle &amp; a test of real democracy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I suspect, however that most local voters vote for whichever national party they dislike least &#8211; and that is why I’m not sure about the “local democracy” values.&#8221;</p>
<p>Under the SNP proposal that&#8217;s just what I would do.</p>
<p>The way to restore real local democracy in UK is to give more &amp; effective powers to locally elected councils -and make them responsible for raising more of their budgets themselves-not less as in this proposal.</p>
<p>At present-you are right-Party Groups spend locally according to centrally dictated priorities &amp; rules.A large part of their income is doled out by Whitehall-who decide who gets what.<br />
Local Councillors are little more than ciphers &amp; might as well have all their revenues raised by the Central Government via a Central Income Tax Surcharge -as proposed by SNP.</p>
<p>&#8220;No taxation without representation&#8221; has always seemed to me to  be a sound principle &amp; a test of real democracy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluffy Thoughts (E.D.P.)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1359/comment-page-2#comment-477688</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluffy Thoughts (E.D.P.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 09:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1359#comment-477688</guid>
		<description>Peter Cairns,

The SNP need to justify why England should transfer £400 million to the Scottish Executive. Until that happens you won&#039;t get much sympathy &lt;i&gt;darne sarf&#039;&lt;/i&gt;

As I understand it, the £400 million is a Council-Tax rebate for the poor. Under LIT surely the poor will not pay anything. Ergo, no rebate.

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Cairns,</p>
<p>The SNP need to justify why England should transfer £400 million to the Scottish Executive. Until that happens you won&#8217;t get much sympathy <i>darne sarf&#8217;</i></p>
<p>As I understand it, the £400 million is a Council-Tax rebate for the poor. Under LIT surely the poor will not pay anything. Ergo, no rebate.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1359/comment-page-2#comment-477289</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1359#comment-477289</guid>
		<description>&quot;LIT is popular with the public&quot;. Have you tried explaining it to anyone in your local?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;LIT is popular with the public&#8221;. Have you tried explaining it to anyone in your local?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

