<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tory sleaze?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241</link>
	<description>Independent Survey and Polling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Let&#8217;s Do The Time Warp Again: Westminster Watch: w/b 7th July 2008 &#124; The Wardman Wire</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-438806</link>
		<dc:creator>Let&#8217;s Do The Time Warp Again: Westminster Watch: w/b 7th July 2008 &#124; The Wardman Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-438806</guid>
		<description>[...] the hero of the beleagured bag-carriers who have to answer constituency correspondence, and the UK Polling Report looked at the impact that Spelman and the recent raft of Conservative sleaze has had on their poll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the hero of the beleagured bag-carriers who have to answer constituency correspondence, and the UK Polling Report looked at the impact that Spelman and the recent raft of Conservative sleaze has had on their poll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluffy Thoughts (E.D.P.)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437503</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluffy Thoughts (E.D.P.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 06:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437503</guid>
		<description>Is there a PC-euphemism for fraud? We have MPs demanding consistent punishment for benefit &lt;i&gt;misclaims&lt;/i&gt;, yet have rejected transparency in their expenses in a recent vote. And the benefit fraud figures (according to Michael Dunne, MP) were &lt;i&gt;reclassified&lt;/i&gt; to suit the Government&#039;s agenda!

Spelman should go, and Hain should be fitted-out for a prisoners uniform. Will it happen, I doubt it. Do I care, or am I just fed-up with the whole sorry bunch of under-performers? You guess....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a PC-euphemism for fraud? We have MPs demanding consistent punishment for benefit <i>misclaims</i>, yet have rejected transparency in their expenses in a recent vote. And the benefit fraud figures (according to Michael Dunne, MP) were <i>reclassified</i> to suit the Government&#8217;s agenda!</p>
<p>Spelman should go, and Hain should be fitted-out for a prisoners uniform. Will it happen, I doubt it. Do I care, or am I just fed-up with the whole sorry bunch of under-performers? You guess&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437347</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 22:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437347</guid>
		<description>Andy, I&#039;m not sure that this is something that can be hyped by the media, or indeed that the media are able to initiate campaigns wholly themselves.

The facts are the facts and incompetence or incoherence will out as events process through the cycle.

If Boris hadn&#039;t become mayor Ray Lewis wouldn&#039;t have come under scrutiny.

If the government hadn&#039;t passed the FoI act it wouldn&#039;t have been forced to release details of expenses etc etc.

There is never any valid excuse for the blatant abuse of public office or public money, whether by elected or unelected officials - it is all part of making society more accountable.

So whether it is the MoD or the person in charge of compliance to the regulations (Spelman) it is in both our and their own interests to enforce the rules to raise the standard of the game.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy, I&#8217;m not sure that this is something that can be hyped by the media, or indeed that the media are able to initiate campaigns wholly themselves.</p>
<p>The facts are the facts and incompetence or incoherence will out as events process through the cycle.</p>
<p>If Boris hadn&#8217;t become mayor Ray Lewis wouldn&#8217;t have come under scrutiny.</p>
<p>If the government hadn&#8217;t passed the FoI act it wouldn&#8217;t have been forced to release details of expenses etc etc.</p>
<p>There is never any valid excuse for the blatant abuse of public office or public money, whether by elected or unelected officials &#8211; it is all part of making society more accountable.</p>
<p>So whether it is the MoD or the person in charge of compliance to the regulations (Spelman) it is in both our and their own interests to enforce the rules to raise the standard of the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437285</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437285</guid>
		<description>I think a report showing that families waste £420 a year on unused food is actually quite a good thing.  

Perhaps we need to look at use by / best before dates that supermarkets put on. working in the food industry, I am aware that the dates are put significantly lower so the dates come and go and consumers will throw them out and buy new thus spending more.

Also, heard a report today that one govt department threw out 20 tonnes of food waste last year. Sounds like the govt should practice what they preach</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a report showing that families waste £420 a year on unused food is actually quite a good thing.  </p>
<p>Perhaps we need to look at use by / best before dates that supermarkets put on. working in the food industry, I am aware that the dates are put significantly lower so the dates come and go and consumers will throw them out and buy new thus spending more.</p>
<p>Also, heard a report today that one govt department threw out 20 tonnes of food waste last year. Sounds like the govt should practice what they preach</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437265</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437265</guid>
		<description>I wonder to what extent the issue of &quot;Tory sleaze&quot; in particular has been hyped up by the media in general now that the Conservatives are serious contenders to govern the country and that Labour under Gordon Brown has recently hit such depths in the polls?  Had Labour still been in the lead now as they were a year ago this issue would probably be the least of David Cameron&#039;s worries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder to what extent the issue of &#8220;Tory sleaze&#8221; in particular has been hyped up by the media in general now that the Conservatives are serious contenders to govern the country and that Labour under Gordon Brown has recently hit such depths in the polls?  Had Labour still been in the lead now as they were a year ago this issue would probably be the least of David Cameron&#8217;s worries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437250</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437250</guid>
		<description>Thanks Anthony, I think that&#039;d be great. 

Complete exclusion of DKs/others (and equally their aggregation or use of equivalent weighting) discounts this factor far too easily in my view, which lets the parties of government and opposition off the hook.

It is a similar argument as that regarding turnout, as both can only offer any conclusions when calculations are measured over a long enough timescale.

Are there any offers of insight as to why the total polling share of the 3 major parties has fallen so far in 15 years except as a result of sleaze?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Anthony, I think that&#8217;d be great. </p>
<p>Complete exclusion of DKs/others (and equally their aggregation or use of equivalent weighting) discounts this factor far too easily in my view, which lets the parties of government and opposition off the hook.</p>
<p>It is a similar argument as that regarding turnout, as both can only offer any conclusions when calculations are measured over a long enough timescale.</p>
<p>Are there any offers of insight as to why the total polling share of the 3 major parties has fallen so far in 15 years except as a result of sleaze?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437218</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 16:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437218</guid>
		<description>thomas - don&#039;t knows are not including in the &quot;other&quot; score anyway, it is solely minor parties. Don&#039;t knows are either excluded entirely (in MORI and YouGov polls) or partially excluded and partially assumed to be voting for the party they supported in 2005 (ICM and Populus).

I&#039;ll try and collate numbers, but from a brief look at don&#039;t knows there doesn&#039;t seem to be any obvious trend. In YouGov polls around 13-14% normally say don&#039;t know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thomas &#8211; don&#8217;t knows are not including in the &#8220;other&#8221; score anyway, it is solely minor parties. Don&#8217;t knows are either excluded entirely (in MORI and YouGov polls) or partially excluded and partially assumed to be voting for the party they supported in 2005 (ICM and Populus).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try and collate numbers, but from a brief look at don&#8217;t knows there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any obvious trend. In YouGov polls around 13-14% normally say don&#8217;t know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437164</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437164</guid>
		<description>As always we must wait and see what effect the &#039;sleaze&#039; has on poll ratings.

Of course what forms peopls opinions is the result of a mixed picture of issues and it take a while for the accumulation of publicity on a subject to stick to one or other party.

The 10p tax debacle took about three weeks to feed though wage packets after it became law at the start of the tax year and began to hit the poll ratings of Labour, and it has taken more than a decade to &#039;decontaminate&#039; the tory brand on a variety of issues, so I suspect a trade-off between the least-worst aspects is currently in play in the public mind when we come decide for ourselves.

As I&#039;ve said previously the growth in the DK/other statistic is the significant factor which best shows the hightening disillusion regarding standards in public life - up from 1-3% at the start of this site&#039;s record to 10-11% currently.

I think it would be informative for Anthony to start showing the status of UKIP/Green/BNP popularity or at least differentiate between other and don&#039;t knows in this light - the politicians might then have some real data with which to inform a practical response.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always we must wait and see what effect the &#8217;sleaze&#8217; has on poll ratings.</p>
<p>Of course what forms peopls opinions is the result of a mixed picture of issues and it take a while for the accumulation of publicity on a subject to stick to one or other party.</p>
<p>The 10p tax debacle took about three weeks to feed though wage packets after it became law at the start of the tax year and began to hit the poll ratings of Labour, and it has taken more than a decade to &#8216;decontaminate&#8217; the tory brand on a variety of issues, so I suspect a trade-off between the least-worst aspects is currently in play in the public mind when we come decide for ourselves.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;ve said previously the growth in the DK/other statistic is the significant factor which best shows the hightening disillusion regarding standards in public life &#8211; up from 1-3% at the start of this site&#8217;s record to 10-11% currently.</p>
<p>I think it would be informative for Anthony to start showing the status of UKIP/Green/BNP popularity or at least differentiate between other and don&#8217;t knows in this light &#8211; the politicians might then have some real data with which to inform a practical response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437138</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437138</guid>
		<description>Today&#039;s article by Jackie Ashley in the Guardian (see link below) sums up the Tory sleaze, and also the hapless Boris positions, really well.  Basically she thinks internal contradictions within the Tory tent will unravel but not until after they have won the next GE,  as voters are so fed up with Labour and their poll lead too large for Labour to come back from.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/07/conservatives.davidcameron&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today&#8217;s article by Jackie Ashley in the Guardian (see link below) sums up the Tory sleaze, and also the hapless Boris positions, really well.  Basically she thinks internal contradictions within the Tory tent will unravel but not until after they have won the next GE,  as voters are so fed up with Labour and their poll lead too large for Labour to come back from.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/07/conservatives.davidcameron" rel="nofollow">link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudgud the dog</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1241/comment-page-1#comment-437133</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudgud the dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1241#comment-437133</guid>
		<description>The question is, do people thinking a party is corrupt make them less likely to vote for it? One might intunitively think &#039;yes&#039; but the evidence does not tally, with Labour winning in 2005 despite a wide reputation for corruption. Of course, people probably thought the Conservtaives were just as bad.

People always think the Liberals are the least corrupt party- if it was a big issue, surely voters would flock to the least sleazy and least corrupt party. I think the deeper truth is that people believe, and are fairly comfortable with, the idea that most mainstream parties and politicians are corrupt to lesser or greater extents.

Surely the electorate of Italy knew Bellisconi was corrupt but they still voted for him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, do people thinking a party is corrupt make them less likely to vote for it? One might intunitively think &#8216;yes&#8217; but the evidence does not tally, with Labour winning in 2005 despite a wide reputation for corruption. Of course, people probably thought the Conservtaives were just as bad.</p>
<p>People always think the Liberals are the least corrupt party- if it was a big issue, surely voters would flock to the least sleazy and least corrupt party. I think the deeper truth is that people believe, and are fairly comfortable with, the idea that most mainstream parties and politicians are corrupt to lesser or greater extents.</p>
<p>Surely the electorate of Italy knew Bellisconi was corrupt but they still voted for him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
