<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8% think they can name their MEP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1227/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1227</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Shapps in exciting opinion poll shocker! &#124; Mark Pack</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1227/comment-page-1#comment-570429</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Shapps in exciting opinion poll shocker! &#124; Mark Pack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1227#comment-570429</guid>
		<description>[...] woof woof. Waggle tail waggle. It&#039;s the opinion poll finding of the year. It turns out that loveable IT security and password expert Grant Shapps is named by more people as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] woof woof. Waggle tail waggle. It&#8217;s the opinion poll finding of the year. It turns out that loveable IT security and password expert Grant Shapps is named by more people as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1227/comment-page-1#comment-423641</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1227#comment-423641</guid>
		<description>So that&#039;s that then.

Lots of &quot;ideals &amp; compromise&quot; ?
...but don&#039;t touch French farm subsidies

No &quot;bullying&quot; ?
.... but all back in October with a Irish Yes-or else.
 

plus c&#039;est la même chose!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So that&#8217;s that then.</p>
<p>Lots of &#8220;ideals &amp; compromise&#8221; ?<br />
&#8230;but don&#8217;t touch French farm subsidies</p>
<p>No &#8220;bullying&#8221; ?<br />
&#8230;. but all back in October with a Irish Yes-or else.</p>
<p>plus c&#8217;est la même chose!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluffy Thoughts (E.D.P.)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1227/comment-page-1#comment-422833</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluffy Thoughts (E.D.P.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 06:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1227#comment-422833</guid>
		<description>On topic, no I cannot name my MEP, but I know he defected from Labour to the Tories a few years back. As for the general EU debate, well my position is clear, OUT.

Now I try to avoid most North American news as it is so parochial, so on the following point I may be wrong but I&#039;m sure NAFTA does not have a similar bureaucratical jungle as the EU? Why can states not agree treaties amongst themselves, and delegate to the judiciary the implementation and safeguards? After all NAFTA is the model that most Europeans aspire to (free-trade not governance).

World governance has been tried many times - Empire, League of Nations, United Nations, etc - and has failed as people, states and nations are different. I certainly would not look forward to global homogeneity,  especially as the proposer does not indicate and democratic participation or framework (which may be the inherent flaw in any such scenario).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On topic, no I cannot name my MEP, but I know he defected from Labour to the Tories a few years back. As for the general EU debate, well my position is clear, OUT.</p>
<p>Now I try to avoid most North American news as it is so parochial, so on the following point I may be wrong but I&#8217;m sure NAFTA does not have a similar bureaucratical jungle as the EU? Why can states not agree treaties amongst themselves, and delegate to the judiciary the implementation and safeguards? After all NAFTA is the model that most Europeans aspire to (free-trade not governance).</p>
<p>World governance has been tried many times &#8211; Empire, League of Nations, United Nations, etc &#8211; and has failed as people, states and nations are different. I certainly would not look forward to global homogeneity,  especially as the proposer does not indicate and democratic participation or framework (which may be the inherent flaw in any such scenario).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john t t</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1227/comment-page-1#comment-422344</link>
		<dc:creator>john t t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1227#comment-422344</guid>
		<description>I think what I&#039;m saying/agreeing Peter is at least &quot;In or Out&quot; would make better telly, and would be better than nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what I&#8217;m saying/agreeing Peter is at least &#8220;In or Out&#8221; would make better telly, and would be better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john t t</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1227/comment-page-1#comment-422342</link>
		<dc:creator>john t t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1227#comment-422342</guid>
		<description>The nature of the thing makes for poor telly. Stalemates, compromises, wrangling etc. No chance of a big fisticuffs, or of a great ideological shift. 

At least we have clear blue water as a domestic concept, and the possibility of a real change. The EU is boring (but then so it should be!) - I just wish it was boring and Cheap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nature of the thing makes for poor telly. Stalemates, compromises, wrangling etc. No chance of a big fisticuffs, or of a great ideological shift. </p>
<p>At least we have clear blue water as a domestic concept, and the possibility of a real change. The EU is boring (but then so it should be!) &#8211; I just wish it was boring and Cheap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

