<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICM Poll in the Sunday Telegraph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1219/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1219</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GIN</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-413923</link>
		<dc:creator>GIN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1219#comment-413923</guid>
		<description>Another new low for Labour with ICM. They are now pretty much at YouGov levels!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another new low for Labour with ICM. They are now pretty much at YouGov levels!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-413917</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1219#comment-413917</guid>
		<description>Con 42 Lab 26 LibDem 21 lead up 2 points to 16 but all changes are 1% statistically insignificant well within M of E .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Con 42 Lab 26 LibDem 21 lead up 2 points to 16 but all changes are 1% statistically insignificant well within M of E .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcia</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1219/comment-page-1#comment-413893</link>
		<dc:creator>marcia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 19:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1219#comment-413893</guid>
		<description>Is there such a thing as an &#039;unhealthy lead&#039;? From reading the TLW site it appears to suggest dismal reading for Labour.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there such a thing as an &#8216;unhealthy lead&#8217;? From reading the TLW site it appears to suggest dismal reading for Labour.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

