<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are US polls &#8220;rubbish&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1217/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1217</link>
	<description>Independent Survey and Polling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 20:40:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Gadsden</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1217/comment-page-1#comment-412264</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gadsden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 06:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1217#comment-412264</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much of the inaccuracy is because, in a primary, they have to report raw figures, where our pollsters are able to make adjustments to account for &quot;shy Tories&quot; or whatever - not an option when each election is sui generis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much of the inaccuracy is because, in a primary, they have to report raw figures, where our pollsters are able to make adjustments to account for &#8220;shy Tories&#8221; or whatever &#8211; not an option when each election is sui generis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1217/comment-page-1#comment-410108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 15:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1217#comment-410108</guid>
		<description>And for those interested in overseas polls-
Australia
+&#039; Last weekend also marked the six-month mark of the new government, and the honeymoon continues for Kevin Rudd. According to a Nielsen poll, Rudd is the second most popular prime minister in the 36-year history of the poll. Here are the respective high-points for each Prime Minister since then. Hawke 75%; Rudd 69%; Howard 67%; Whitlam, 62%; Fraser 56; Keating, 40%. According to Newspoll, Rudd beats even Hawke.&#039; Who said the time of Labour PMs is over???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And for those interested in overseas polls-<br />
Australia<br />
+&#8217; Last weekend also marked the six-month mark of the new government, and the honeymoon continues for Kevin Rudd. According to a Nielsen poll, Rudd is the second most popular prime minister in the 36-year history of the poll. Here are the respective high-points for each Prime Minister since then. Hawke 75%; Rudd 69%; Howard 67%; Whitlam, 62%; Fraser 56; Keating, 40%. According to Newspoll, Rudd beats even Hawke.&#8217; Who said the time of Labour PMs is over???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
