<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouGov shows Boris set to win</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1194/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1194</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: FluffyThoughts (E.D.P.)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1194/comment-page-3#comment-390543</link>
		<dc:creator>FluffyThoughts (E.D.P.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1194#comment-390543</guid>
		<description>David Bowtell said:

N Beale

&lt;i&gt;Apologies for the typos which I hope didn’t detract too much from the sense of what I was saying.&lt;/i&gt;

Sorry, missed your apology....

&lt;i&gt;As for evidence about the tax changes I suggest, I’m not in a position to commission a poll but I believe a VAT cut would be popular....&lt;/i&gt;

Geesh, Labour have refused a ban on the EU-Constitutional Referendum! Do you really think they would allow a vote on V.A.T. (which is a EU-tax)? I may be a nuisance, but I do try to keep in touch with reality...? :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Bowtell said:</p>
<p>N Beale</p>
<p><i>Apologies for the typos which I hope didn’t detract too much from the sense of what I was saying.</i></p>
<p>Sorry, missed your apology&#8230;.</p>
<p><i>As for evidence about the tax changes I suggest, I’m not in a position to commission a poll but I believe a VAT cut would be popular&#8230;.</i></p>
<p>Geesh, Labour have refused a ban on the EU-Constitutional Referendum! Do you really think they would allow a vote on V.A.T. (which is a EU-tax)? I may be a nuisance, but I do try to keep in touch with reality&#8230;? <img src='http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FluffyThoughts (E.D.P.)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1194/comment-page-3#comment-390542</link>
		<dc:creator>FluffyThoughts (E.D.P.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 13:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1194#comment-390542</guid>
		<description>David/Anthony,

My bad: should read &quot;If you&#039;re a number-cruncher...&quot;. Ok, FireFox does have some limitations...! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David/Anthony,</p>
<p>My bad: should read &#8220;If you&#8217;re a number-cruncher&#8230;&#8221;. Ok, FireFox does have some limitations&#8230;! <img src='http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FluffyThoughts (E.D.P.)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1194/comment-page-3#comment-390541</link>
		<dc:creator>FluffyThoughts (E.D.P.)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 12:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1194#comment-390541</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Fluffy Thoughts (EDP)&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;b&gt;David Botwell&lt;/b&gt;,

&lt;i&gt;Glad to see you have had the time to comment endlessly while many of us have been at work. In the spirit of reasonable debate I really think you have seriously wasted your time such are the lamentable quality of your contributions.&lt;/i&gt;

[You hate commentary? Why...?]

&lt;i&gt;I don’t &lt;b&gt;thing your&lt;/b&gt; belong on this board and I suggest you search ‘Tory Blogs’ where I’m sure you’ll find somewhere to say what you like, when you like and how you like.&lt;/i&gt;

[Where you at Anthony&#039;s wedding party as well...?]

Anthony set the rules, and I explained my purpose on Thursday night/Friday morning. By the way, &lt;i&gt;who are you...?&lt;/i&gt; And please use FireFox, as it may improve your ability to send a cogent message...!

If your a number-cruncher realise this: we come here to debate (however badly). When we are upset/wrong, we &lt;i&gt;withdraw, to reflect&lt;/i&gt;. I suggest you do the same - unless you are Anthony boss.

Anthony,

&lt;i&gt;And can you stop calling them nEU-Labour. Something tells me it isn’t a term of endearment when you use it, so it doesn’t really add to non-pa{s&#124;[r]}tisan discussion does it?&lt;/i&gt;

Point taken: my bad. Will desist. Party allegiances sometime get the better! [Tell D.B. I am not a Tory (anymore :) ). E.D.P. have their own agenda. Just like D.B....!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Fluffy Thoughts (EDP)</i><br />
<b>David Botwell</b>,</p>
<p><i>Glad to see you have had the time to comment endlessly while many of us have been at work. In the spirit of reasonable debate I really think you have seriously wasted your time such are the lamentable quality of your contributions.</i></p>
<p>[You hate commentary? Why...?]</p>
<p><i>I don’t <b>thing your</b> belong on this board and I suggest you search ‘Tory Blogs’ where I’m sure you’ll find somewhere to say what you like, when you like and how you like.</i></p>
<p>[Where you at Anthony's wedding party as well...?]</p>
<p>Anthony set the rules, and I explained my purpose on Thursday night/Friday morning. By the way, <i>who are you&#8230;?</i> And please use FireFox, as it may improve your ability to send a cogent message&#8230;!</p>
<p>If your a number-cruncher realise this: we come here to debate (however badly). When we are upset/wrong, we <i>withdraw, to reflect</i>. I suggest you do the same &#8211; unless you are Anthony boss.</p>
<p>Anthony,</p>
<p><i>And can you stop calling them nEU-Labour. Something tells me it isn’t a term of endearment when you use it, so it doesn’t really add to non-pa{s|[r]}tisan discussion does it?</i></p>
<p>Point taken: my bad. Will desist. Party allegiances sometime get the better! [Tell D.B. I am not a Tory (anymore <img src='http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ). E.D.P. have their own agenda. Just like D.B....!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Jenner</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1194/comment-page-3#comment-389825</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Jenner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1194#comment-389825</guid>
		<description>If anyone is here, I&#039;ve just had a quick (and possibly not accurate) count up of the first preference votes from the individual areas and think it is:

Johnson 43.2%
Livingstone 37%</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone is here, I&#8217;ve just had a quick (and possibly not accurate) count up of the first preference votes from the individual areas and think it is:</p>
<p>Johnson 43.2%<br />
Livingstone 37%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1194/comment-page-3#comment-389776</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/?p=1194#comment-389776</guid>
		<description>First Seat is Tory. Absolute Majority Loss of support from UKIP and Lib Dems. Labour Stable.

This could be interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Seat is Tory. Absolute Majority Loss of support from UKIP and Lib Dems. Labour Stable.</p>
<p>This could be interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

