<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ipsos MORI poll on cannabis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Wheeler (Lab)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116/comment-page-1#comment-346750</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Wheeler (Lab)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116#comment-346750</guid>
		<description>I think we have to be a bit careful about what we class as dealers and such though.  Most people selling pot are just kids who buy a couple of ounces and sell half to their mates.  I&#039;m not trying to justify it but I don&#039;t really see it as a major crime.

Personally I think it should just be legalised.  I&#039;m very uneasy about this &quot;decriminalisation&quot; strategy.  Saying something is against the law but you&#039;ll be let off for it anyway seems to me to be encouraging people to break the law.

A lot&#039;s been said on the health risks of cannabis but to me it seems  to be largely irrelevant.  Alcohol and cigarettes are far worse for you both physically, and more importantly, socially.  There was a story not that long ago about a kid who had become schizophrenic and it was possibly linked to cannabis.  His mother said he had smoked something like an ounce a week every week since he was fifteen.  If he&#039;d drunk a bottle of whisky a day instead he&#039;d probably be dead. I think we need to start getting things in proportion.  We could start by coming up with a non-political drugs classification system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we have to be a bit careful about what we class as dealers and such though.  Most people selling pot are just kids who buy a couple of ounces and sell half to their mates.  I&#8217;m not trying to justify it but I don&#8217;t really see it as a major crime.</p>
<p>Personally I think it should just be legalised.  I&#8217;m very uneasy about this &#8220;decriminalisation&#8221; strategy.  Saying something is against the law but you&#8217;ll be let off for it anyway seems to me to be encouraging people to break the law.</p>
<p>A lot&#8217;s been said on the health risks of cannabis but to me it seems  to be largely irrelevant.  Alcohol and cigarettes are far worse for you both physically, and more importantly, socially.  There was a story not that long ago about a kid who had become schizophrenic and it was possibly linked to cannabis.  His mother said he had smoked something like an ounce a week every week since he was fifteen.  If he&#8217;d drunk a bottle of whisky a day instead he&#8217;d probably be dead. I think we need to start getting things in proportion.  We could start by coming up with a non-political drugs classification system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116/comment-page-1#comment-346675</link>
		<dc:creator>colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116#comment-346675</guid>
		<description>I agree about legality &amp; dealers.

But neither will help the poor wretches who are addicted. They must be given effective treatment &amp; help to achieve total abstinence-and not a lifetime on Methadone.

The  initiative in Scotland, arising from SNP/Tory co-operation, to look again at treatment regimes is a very good start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about legality &amp; dealers.</p>
<p>But neither will help the poor wretches who are addicted. They must be given effective treatment &amp; help to achieve total abstinence-and not a lifetime on Methadone.</p>
<p>The  initiative in Scotland, arising from SNP/Tory co-operation, to look again at treatment regimes is a very good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Richardson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116/comment-page-1#comment-346670</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116#comment-346670</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the sensible majority think that the drug should be illegal - whether it&#039;s calls A , B or C . The real culprits are the dealers - that should be a mandatory sentence of life in prison (pity we lost the death penalty , because i believe that dealers in death &amp; misery dereve the same) - it&#039;s the dealers not the users we should be targetting &amp; that includes anyone who is a user carrying more than they would use for themselves .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the sensible majority think that the drug should be illegal &#8211; whether it&#8217;s calls A , B or C . The real culprits are the dealers &#8211; that should be a mandatory sentence of life in prison (pity we lost the death penalty , because i believe that dealers in death &amp; misery dereve the same) &#8211; it&#8217;s the dealers not the users we should be targetting &amp; that includes anyone who is a user carrying more than they would use for themselves .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Wheeler (Lab)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116/comment-page-1#comment-346608</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Wheeler (Lab)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 10:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116#comment-346608</guid>
		<description>&quot;What this could indicate to us all about who or what is really controlling the established church of the country could be more then interesting.&quot;

That sounds ominous..  Are we talking lizardmen or invaders or something? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What this could indicate to us all about who or what is really controlling the established church of the country could be more then interesting.&#8221;</p>
<p>That sounds ominous..  Are we talking lizardmen or invaders or something? <img src='http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlas shrugged</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116/comment-page-1#comment-346174</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlas shrugged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1116#comment-346174</guid>
		<description>Nicholas

Yes that would be interesting.

Especially if it compared regular CofE church goers with the general public.

I think that the CofE church goers are more upset then the rest of the population. But I could well be wrong about that one.

Is there or has there ever been, an organization in the known universe that is more critical of its own leadership then the people not in it?

Very likely not. What this could indicate to us all about who or what is really controlling the established church of the country could be more then interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicholas</p>
<p>Yes that would be interesting.</p>
<p>Especially if it compared regular CofE church goers with the general public.</p>
<p>I think that the CofE church goers are more upset then the rest of the population. But I could well be wrong about that one.</p>
<p>Is there or has there ever been, an organization in the known universe that is more critical of its own leadership then the people not in it?</p>
<p>Very likely not. What this could indicate to us all about who or what is really controlling the established church of the country could be more then interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

