<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouGov &#8211; Livingstone apparently undamaged by Dispatches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beware the promise of small polls &#124; News in brief</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106/comment-page-1#comment-333061</link>
		<dc:creator>Beware the promise of small polls &#124; News in brief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106#comment-333061</guid>
		<description>[...] coverage of UK PoliticsAs Anthony points out at UK Polling Report, the latest polling giving Ken Livingstone a slightly stretched lead over Tory rival Boris Johnson, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] coverage of UK PoliticsAs Anthony points out at UK Polling Report, the latest polling giving Ken Livingstone a slightly stretched lead over Tory rival Boris Johnson, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wolf</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106/comment-page-1#comment-332884</link>
		<dc:creator>wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106#comment-332884</guid>
		<description>Having read the article in the Independent today it&#039;s remarkable that Labour are predicted to win so many more seats than the Tories with only 30% of the poll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the article in the Independent today it&#8217;s remarkable that Labour are predicted to win so many more seats than the Tories with only 30% of the poll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106/comment-page-1#comment-332462</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106#comment-332462</guid>
		<description>Mike - my guess is that, as Mark Senior suggests, the column headings have buggered up. I suspect two of the other columns are actually the male and female figures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; my guess is that, as Mark Senior suggests, the column headings have buggered up. I suspect two of the other columns are actually the male and female figures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Smithson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106/comment-page-1#comment-332453</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Smithson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 22:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106#comment-332453</guid>
		<description>Anthony - Bob Sykes has posted this on Politicalbetting. Any thoughts...?

&quot;If Boris has 42% of men and 41% of women, how come his “All” vote is only 40%?

How does that work?

I see Ken has 42% of women and 45% of men, yet despite there being more women in the poll than men, his average comes out at 44%.&quot; 

My immediate reaction was rounding but I cannot make that work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony &#8211; Bob Sykes has posted this on Politicalbetting. Any thoughts&#8230;?</p>
<p>&#8220;If Boris has 42% of men and 41% of women, how come his “All” vote is only 40%?</p>
<p>How does that work?</p>
<p>I see Ken has 42% of women and 45% of men, yet despite there being more women in the poll than men, his average comes out at 44%.&#8221; </p>
<p>My immediate reaction was rounding but I cannot make that work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Boothroyd</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106/comment-page-1#comment-331632</link>
		<dc:creator>David Boothroyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1106#comment-331632</guid>
		<description>The version of the poll showing Norris only 2% behind was the one which got all the publicity in 2004, partly because it made the election look wide open, partly because it fitted with the newspaper&#039;s preferences and partly because at the time the national election polls were generally quoting &#039;certain to vote&#039; only in the belief that they were more accurate. So the comparison is very explicable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The version of the poll showing Norris only 2% behind was the one which got all the publicity in 2004, partly because it made the election look wide open, partly because it fitted with the newspaper&#8217;s preferences and partly because at the time the national election polls were generally quoting &#8216;certain to vote&#8217; only in the belief that they were more accurate. So the comparison is very explicable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

