<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ken and Boris neck and neck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093</link>
	<description>Independent Survey and Polling News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:10:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe James Broughton</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-318545</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James Broughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-318545</guid>
		<description>Mayoral election and Lib Dems - James - 

I&#039;d like to believe that a bad performance would damage the LDs generally - but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s really that crucial because they are not expected to win it anyway.

I think Boris can win this and agree with some of Richard&#039;s points - a lot of recognition - but I also think Ken Livingstone will be hard to shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mayoral election and Lib Dems &#8211; James &#8211; </p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to believe that a bad performance would damage the LDs generally &#8211; but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s really that crucial because they are not expected to win it anyway.</p>
<p>I think Boris can win this and agree with some of Richard&#8217;s points &#8211; a lot of recognition &#8211; but I also think Ken Livingstone will be hard to shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-318437</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-318437</guid>
		<description>There has been much talk about whther a Ken victory would cause embarassment for David Cameron, and perhaps prick the bubble of momentum (if you can prick a bubble of momentum??) that is building behind the Conservatives.

However, I&#039;m more interested in how a disasterous showing by the Lib Dem candidate might damage Nick Clegg. Any thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has been much talk about whther a Ken victory would cause embarassment for David Cameron, and perhaps prick the bubble of momentum (if you can prick a bubble of momentum??) that is building behind the Conservatives.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m more interested in how a disasterous showing by the Lib Dem candidate might damage Nick Clegg. Any thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317999</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317999</guid>
		<description>What I am picking up from chats on the street and in the pubs is that Ken Livingstone is seriously tired and well past his &quot;sell-by date&quot;,something of a dinosaur bluntly, while Boris Johnson is young, very clever, and offers new hope for Londoners. The other great plus factor for Boris is that he appeals to the young voters, that notorious band of &quot;no shows&quot; in so many elections, and that must help him to build his majority.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I am picking up from chats on the street and in the pubs is that Ken Livingstone is seriously tired and well past his &#8220;sell-by date&#8221;,something of a dinosaur bluntly, while Boris Johnson is young, very clever, and offers new hope for Londoners. The other great plus factor for Boris is that he appeals to the young voters, that notorious band of &#8220;no shows&#8221; in so many elections, and that must help him to build his majority.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe James Broughton</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317970</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe James Broughton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317970</guid>
		<description>Daniel Finkelstein (who I like) predicted that Ken would win the Mayoral election, but it wouldn&#039;t matter (re the Tories).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel Finkelstein (who I like) predicted that Ken would win the Mayoral election, but it wouldn&#8217;t matter (re the Tories).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317456</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 22:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317456</guid>
		<description>Mark - you can&#039;t tell the make up of the YouGov panel by looking at the unweighted figures as YouGov samples aren&#039;t randomly selected from the panel, they are quota samples. In other words, the unweighted sample isn&#039;t representative of the panel as a whole.

The large weighting downwards of over 55s means only that more over 55s responded than expected and fewer younger respondents replied than expected (or possibly that too many over 55s were invited, but that&#039;s the same thing really: if too many were invited it would be because the response rate was underestimated).

Its always easy to judge whether weighting on demographics is sufficient - look at the weighted figures and compare them to reality. Political weighting by past vote and things is controversial. Weighting on things like age is incredibly simple and (unless its a universe where the age profile is unknown, like party membership) very difficult to get wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; you can&#8217;t tell the make up of the YouGov panel by looking at the unweighted figures as YouGov samples aren&#8217;t randomly selected from the panel, they are quota samples. In other words, the unweighted sample isn&#8217;t representative of the panel as a whole.</p>
<p>The large weighting downwards of over 55s means only that more over 55s responded than expected and fewer younger respondents replied than expected (or possibly that too many over 55s were invited, but that&#8217;s the same thing really: if too many were invited it would be because the response rate was underestimated).</p>
<p>Its always easy to judge whether weighting on demographics is sufficient &#8211; look at the weighted figures and compare them to reality. Political weighting by past vote and things is controversial. Weighting on things like age is incredibly simple and (unless its a universe where the age profile is unknown, like party membership) very difficult to get wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317416</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317416</guid>
		<description>I note also that 50% of Christians said they intended to attend church over the Xmas period . I expect the true figure who did was substantially lower than that .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I note also that 50% of Christians said they intended to attend church over the Xmas period . I expect the true figure who did was substantially lower than that .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317413</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 20:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317413</guid>
		<description>The detailed figures for the poll is on the Yougov website .It illustrates the problem of Yougov&#039;s panel not being representative of the population as a whole . 50% of the 995 responses were from people aged 55+ as compared with the weighted figure of 22% . This age group strongly favours Boris and I realise the weighting is supposed to correct the imbalence in the sample but doubt whether it does so sufficiently .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The detailed figures for the poll is on the Yougov website .It illustrates the problem of Yougov&#8217;s panel not being representative of the population as a whole . 50% of the 995 responses were from people aged 55+ as compared with the weighted figure of 22% . This age group strongly favours Boris and I realise the weighting is supposed to correct the imbalence in the sample but doubt whether it does so sufficiently .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 601</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317369</link>
		<dc:creator>601</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 19:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317369</guid>
		<description>Thank-you Sean.

We need a poll that shows both first and second prefrences.

The questions should be, will you vote for the labour party candidate Ken tory party candidate Boris etc in the telephone polls. Although both figures have managed to get themselves recognised beyond their parties.

I think Ken will win because more Libdems will always vote for the Labour candidate in the second prefrence.

What if on the first prefrence one candidate gets more than 50%, do they still count the second prefrences. (Can I vote for Boris twice and mess up my second prfrence)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank-you Sean.</p>
<p>We need a poll that shows both first and second prefrences.</p>
<p>The questions should be, will you vote for the labour party candidate Ken tory party candidate Boris etc in the telephone polls. Although both figures have managed to get themselves recognised beyond their parties.</p>
<p>I think Ken will win because more Libdems will always vote for the Labour candidate in the second prefrence.</p>
<p>What if on the first prefrence one candidate gets more than 50%, do they still count the second prefrences. (Can I vote for Boris twice and mess up my second prfrence)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Election updates for those that care &#171; The Rosemont Loving</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317326</link>
		<dc:creator>Election updates for those that care &#171; The Rosemont Loving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317326</guid>
		<description>[...] that&#160;care 3 January 2008, 6:00 pm  Filed under: Current Affairs, Politics, UK, USA, World  Boris and Livingstone are neck and neck and Clinton is currently favourite to win in the US. Not that it matters for now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that&nbsp;care 3 January 2008, 6:00 pm  Filed under: Current Affairs, Politics, UK, USA, World  Boris and Livingstone are neck and neck and Clinton is currently favourite to win in the US. Not that it matters for now [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair Cameron</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093/comment-page-1#comment-317295</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair Cameron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 16:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1093#comment-317295</guid>
		<description>People may be a little sick of Ken, but I would suggest Boris is high in the polls on sheer personality and name recognition. It will be interesting to see how much of that translates into actual votes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People may be a little sick of Ken, but I would suggest Boris is high in the polls on sheer personality and name recognition. It will be interesting to see how much of that translates into actual votes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
