<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouGov give Tories a commanding lead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:23:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087/comment-page-3#comment-309458</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 21:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087#comment-309458</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Just how do you know that Anthony doesn&#039;t edit other peoples posts? 

I&#039;ve seen a fair number of partisan posts here from all sides but few are as blatant as yours. I think you might  just be particularly thin skinned while others are perhaps less easily irked by partisan posts.

Me, I&#039;ve got a hide like a rhino so I can take most things in my stride. For the record I think I&#039;ve only been edited once, although if Anthony was willing to fix spelling mistakes I am sure I&#039;d get a lot more.

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Just how do you know that Anthony doesn&#8217;t edit other peoples posts? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a fair number of partisan posts here from all sides but few are as blatant as yours. I think you might  just be particularly thin skinned while others are perhaps less easily irked by partisan posts.</p>
<p>Me, I&#8217;ve got a hide like a rhino so I can take most things in my stride. For the record I think I&#8217;ve only been edited once, although if Anthony was willing to fix spelling mistakes I am sure I&#8217;d get a lot more.</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Richardson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087/comment-page-3#comment-308983</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:02:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087#comment-308983</guid>
		<description>I intend to highlight any partisan discussion on here from any political direction for future censorship !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I intend to highlight any partisan discussion on here from any political direction for future censorship !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Richardson</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087/comment-page-3#comment-308981</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 01:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087#comment-308981</guid>
		<description>ANTHONY :-

I object to your EDITING of my comments as a form of censorship ! You allow any partisan rantings by Labour supporters against anything i say including personal insults towards me - like Steven Wheeler (Lab) without any censorship !!

If you are wanting to run a site based on POLLS and peoples reaction to them - and you want to stop any partisan talk - i suggest you take an UNBIASED view when CENSORING comments and stop looking for mine in particular !

Perhaps spme of the abusive personal commenst should be looked at first ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANTHONY :-</p>
<p>I object to your EDITING of my comments as a form of censorship ! You allow any partisan rantings by Labour supporters against anything i say including personal insults towards me &#8211; like Steven Wheeler (Lab) without any censorship !!</p>
<p>If you are wanting to run a site based on POLLS and peoples reaction to them &#8211; and you want to stop any partisan talk &#8211; i suggest you take an UNBIASED view when CENSORING comments and stop looking for mine in particular !</p>
<p>Perhaps spme of the abusive personal commenst should be looked at first ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087/comment-page-3#comment-308934</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087#comment-308934</guid>
		<description>At 4% a month increase in Tory support we can predict two things..... 

Either by this time next year we will all be voting Tory, or that 4% a month is a meaningless statistic. I am for the latter.

I think the line that the Brown bounce is over and that it&#039;s back to what we saw in the spring with a general public mood for a change after 11 years is realistic and probably right. 

That means in UK terms 40%, 30%, 15%, with 15% up for grabs. So we could see 45% to 30% for the Tories but we could also see 40% to 35%.

 The LibDems won&#039;t go much below 15% but they won&#039;t go over 205 either.

We are therefore on course for a small minority Tory Government on current polls, but all that could change due to the dreaded &quot;Events&quot; or things coalescing closer to the election.

In Scotland you need to account for the SNP ( Look Anthony even though it&#039;s getting very partisan I didn&#039;t put GLORIOUS in front of the name), so I&#039;d currently go for 30%, 30%, 15% 15% and 10% up for grabs.

When I don&#039;t mention other it&#039;s not that I dismiss them but rather that they do tend to get squeezed when a FPTP election is close.

Anthony,

Just in passing when I pull up the YouGov results as PDF&#039;s and click on full details, nothing happens, so I can&#039;t access the full tables. As I use a Mac it might be an issue just for me.

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At 4% a month increase in Tory support we can predict two things&#8230;.. </p>
<p>Either by this time next year we will all be voting Tory, or that 4% a month is a meaningless statistic. I am for the latter.</p>
<p>I think the line that the Brown bounce is over and that it&#8217;s back to what we saw in the spring with a general public mood for a change after 11 years is realistic and probably right. </p>
<p>That means in UK terms 40%, 30%, 15%, with 15% up for grabs. So we could see 45% to 30% for the Tories but we could also see 40% to 35%.</p>
<p> The LibDems won&#8217;t go much below 15% but they won&#8217;t go over 205 either.</p>
<p>We are therefore on course for a small minority Tory Government on current polls, but all that could change due to the dreaded &#8220;Events&#8221; or things coalescing closer to the election.</p>
<p>In Scotland you need to account for the SNP ( Look Anthony even though it&#8217;s getting very partisan I didn&#8217;t put GLORIOUS in front of the name), so I&#8217;d currently go for 30%, 30%, 15% 15% and 10% up for grabs.</p>
<p>When I don&#8217;t mention other it&#8217;s not that I dismiss them but rather that they do tend to get squeezed when a FPTP election is close.</p>
<p>Anthony,</p>
<p>Just in passing when I pull up the YouGov results as PDF&#8217;s and click on full details, nothing happens, so I can&#8217;t access the full tables. As I use a Mac it might be an issue just for me.</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087/comment-page-3#comment-308911</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1087#comment-308911</guid>
		<description>Poll is in tomorrow&#039;s Telegraph Con 43 Lab 31 LibDem 16 presumably Others 10</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll is in tomorrow&#8217;s Telegraph Con 43 Lab 31 LibDem 16 presumably Others 10</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

