<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Populus Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul H-J</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085/comment-page-1#comment-305366</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul H-J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 22:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085#comment-305366</guid>
		<description>Mark,

Whether the UK manages to avoid a technical recession or not in 2008, for many people it will feel like one as their disposable income disappears into higher mortgage payments and (some) prices start to rise sharply - not to mention higher taxes - even if the budget offers more illusory tax &quot;cuts&quot;. Remember also that the people most affected by Brown&#039;s last budget are those earning well below national average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>Whether the UK manages to avoid a technical recession or not in 2008, for many people it will feel like one as their disposable income disappears into higher mortgage payments and (some) prices start to rise sharply &#8211; not to mention higher taxes &#8211; even if the budget offers more illusory tax &#8220;cuts&#8221;. Remember also that the people most affected by Brown&#8217;s last budget are those earning well below national average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluffy Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085/comment-page-1#comment-304097</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluffy Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085#comment-304097</guid>
		<description>Mark Senior, you are probably correct. However it has to be pointed out that we just managed to miss a recession in 2001.

Considering that economic conditions are not as benign, especially as credit-costs/inflation are predicted to rise (despite/because-of the BoE&#039;s recent interest-rate cut) it would be wise to be cautious. One remembers Master Cavuto on Fox&#039;s business-programme encouraging people to ignore the doomsters about the forth-coming housing-crash.... The rest is - as they say - history (along with many peoples&#039; credit-record)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark Senior, you are probably correct. However it has to be pointed out that we just managed to miss a recession in 2001.</p>
<p>Considering that economic conditions are not as benign, especially as credit-costs/inflation are predicted to rise (despite/because-of the BoE&#8217;s recent interest-rate cut) it would be wise to be cautious. One remembers Master Cavuto on Fox&#8217;s business-programme encouraging people to ignore the doomsters about the forth-coming housing-crash&#8230;. The rest is &#8211; as they say &#8211; history (along with many peoples&#8217; credit-record)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085/comment-page-1#comment-304044</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085#comment-304044</guid>
		<description>There will not be a recession next year as defined by 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth ( I personally doubt whether there will be 1 quarter with negative growth ) . None of the doomsters and gloomsters preicting a recession would actually take me up on my offer of a wager on this .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will not be a recession next year as defined by 2 consecutive quarters of negative growth ( I personally doubt whether there will be 1 quarter with negative growth ) . None of the doomsters and gloomsters preicting a recession would actually take me up on my offer of a wager on this .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluffy Thoughts</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085/comment-page-1#comment-304018</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluffy Thoughts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 10:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085#comment-304018</guid>
		<description>Recession or slowdown, which will it be...?

A recession is two consecutive periods of negative growth. Yet most economists (source: The Economist) are predicting 2.0% growth next year. But these two positions are not exclusive. Look back to 1992 and you will find that George Bush Senior had a similar economic climate.

So a recession in the first-half of next year is a possibility, with real-growth picking up in the third/fourth quarter. Anyone looking for a direction should check-out Irish last-quarter growth (-5.5% at an annualised rate)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recession or slowdown, which will it be&#8230;?</p>
<p>A recession is two consecutive periods of negative growth. Yet most economists (source: The Economist) are predicting 2.0% growth next year. But these two positions are not exclusive. Look back to 1992 and you will find that George Bush Senior had a similar economic climate.</p>
<p>So a recession in the first-half of next year is a possibility, with real-growth picking up in the third/fourth quarter. Anyone looking for a direction should check-out Irish last-quarter growth (-5.5% at an annualised rate)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NBeale</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085/comment-page-1#comment-303968</link>
		<dc:creator>NBeale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 08:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1085#comment-303968</guid>
		<description>Steven,

The theoretical 90% confidence interval may be +/- 3% (it will depend on the sample size, I haven&#039;t checked) but this is a lower bound on the empirical confidence interval, since the theory depends on it being a truly random sample.

It is one of the most robust findings of behavioural finance that peoples &quot;90% confidence intervals&quot; generally turn out to be 70% (or less) in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven,</p>
<p>The theoretical 90% confidence interval may be +/- 3% (it will depend on the sample size, I haven&#8217;t checked) but this is a lower bound on the empirical confidence interval, since the theory depends on it being a truly random sample.</p>
<p>It is one of the most robust findings of behavioural finance that peoples &#8220;90% confidence intervals&#8221; generally turn out to be 70% (or less) in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

