<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sunday polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 01:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Timmins</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075/comment-page-1#comment-288609</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Timmins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075#comment-288609</guid>
		<description>For those that are gleeful at the Conservative 13% lead,the same party was 13% behind a only few months ago.

Don&#039;t count your turkeys before Christmas arrives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those that are gleeful at the Conservative 13% lead,the same party was 13% behind a only few months ago.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t count your turkeys before Christmas arrives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Wells</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075/comment-page-1#comment-288608</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075#comment-288608</guid>
		<description>Collin - what Mark says. It was just a name change, but they have shifted their methodology a couple of times, most significantly in February when they made a major adjustment. Since Febuary their new weighting seems to be particularly favourable towards the Conservatives and &#039;others&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collin &#8211; what Mark says. It was just a name change, but they have shifted their methodology a couple of times, most significantly in February when they made a major adjustment. Since Febuary their new weighting seems to be particularly favourable towards the Conservatives and &#8216;others&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy D</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075/comment-page-1#comment-288479</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075#comment-288479</guid>
		<description>13% is the biggest Tory lead of any poll since August 1988.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>13% is the biggest Tory lead of any poll since August 1988.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075/comment-page-1#comment-288457</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075#comment-288457</guid>
		<description>Looking at ICM, the one that stands out for scotland, is Cameron/Osbourne v Brown/Darling. Where as the Uk figure is 32% to 39%, a 7 point labour lead, the Scotland figure is 15% to 61%, about 4 to 1. 

No I know it&#039;s a small sample, but that can&#039;t be a statistical error. When you look at the other questions on both Darling and Brown they still do better but by nothing like as much. 

It&#039;s hard not to draw the conclusion that Scotland still doesn&#039;t trust the Tories. Whether that means that the SNP will be the focus of he antilabour vote, or that Scots will rally to Labour to prevent a Tory government is the question i don&#039;t think we ca answer until we get a decent Scottish poll preferably one that asks the question outright.

&quot; If there was a UK General Election, would the prospect of a Conservative Government make you more or less likely to vote for , Labour/SNP/Libdem&quot;.

The answer to that could shape the electoral stategy of every party in Scotland.

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at ICM, the one that stands out for scotland, is Cameron/Osbourne v Brown/Darling. Where as the Uk figure is 32% to 39%, a 7 point labour lead, the Scotland figure is 15% to 61%, about 4 to 1. </p>
<p>No I know it&#8217;s a small sample, but that can&#8217;t be a statistical error. When you look at the other questions on both Darling and Brown they still do better but by nothing like as much. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard not to draw the conclusion that Scotland still doesn&#8217;t trust the Tories. Whether that means that the SNP will be the focus of he antilabour vote, or that Scots will rally to Labour to prevent a Tory government is the question i don&#8217;t think we ca answer until we get a decent Scottish poll preferably one that asks the question outright.</p>
<p>&#8221; If there was a UK General Election, would the prospect of a Conservative Government make you more or less likely to vote for , Labour/SNP/Libdem&#8221;.</p>
<p>The answer to that could shape the electoral stategy of every party in Scotland.</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075/comment-page-1#comment-288453</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1075#comment-288453</guid>
		<description>It was just a name change similar to British Telecommunications becoming BT . They did introduce substantial changes in their weighting with their Feb 2007 poll so polls before that date should not be considered as part of the same comparable series .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just a name change similar to British Telecommunications becoming BT . They did introduce substantial changes in their weighting with their Feb 2007 poll so polls before that date should not be considered as part of the same comparable series .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

