<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First poll since the missing discs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073</link>
	<description>Opinion polling and political analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke Blaxill (Lukw)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073/comment-page-2#comment-285741</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke Blaxill (Lukw)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073#comment-285741</guid>
		<description>21% simply intuitively seems far too high. I might be prepared to believe 18% from the most favorable pollster, but not higher. The poof of the pudding will be in further polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>21% simply intuitively seems far too high. I might be prepared to believe 18% from the most favorable pollster, but not higher. The poof of the pudding will be in further polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073/comment-page-2#comment-285698</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073#comment-285698</guid>
		<description>Mark,

fair enough, the last guardian/ICM was,


28th Oct 2007,     Tory 40%, Labour 35%, LibDem 18%, Others 7%

That would make it Tories -3% Labour -4% LibDems +3% Others +4%

That could potentailly be even better for the SNP if we have done well from the &quot;Others&quot; going up. 

Given the election for LibDem leadership and the governments bad week I am not surprised at the LibDems rising, but I doubt they will stay at 21% for long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>fair enough, the last guardian/ICM was,</p>
<p>28th Oct 2007,     Tory 40%, Labour 35%, LibDem 18%, Others 7%</p>
<p>That would make it Tories -3% Labour -4% LibDems +3% Others +4%</p>
<p>That could potentailly be even better for the SNP if we have done well from the &#8220;Others&#8221; going up. </p>
<p>Given the election for LibDem leadership and the governments bad week I am not surprised at the LibDems rising, but I doubt they will stay at 21% for long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073/comment-page-2#comment-285689</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073#comment-285689</guid>
		<description>Peter , the ICM poll you refer to had some peculiar features which Anthony and I discussed on a previous thread . I am not convinced that it is wise to quote the changes from that poll , better to use the last Guardian poll but that is just my opinion .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter , the ICM poll you refer to had some peculiar features which Anthony and I discussed on a previous thread . I am not convinced that it is wise to quote the changes from that poll , better to use the last Guardian poll but that is just my opinion .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Senior</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073/comment-page-2#comment-285681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Senior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073#comment-285681</guid>
		<description>Luke you cannot say that the LibDems have gone from 14 to 21 so this poll is a rogue . Because of their different methodologies Yougov always give LibDems a low rating and ICM a high rating . Populus and Comres with their methodologies being in between . The change in ICM from the previous ICM/Guardian poll is + 3 which is feasible .
  What nonone knows of course is whose methodology is the correct one . Is Yougov&#039;s 14 the right level or ICM&#039;s 21 or somewhere in between . Of course we will all prefer to believe that the one most favourable to the party we support is the right one .
  I therefore put more trust in ICM than Yougov , you probably the opposite but this is really just faith on our parts. I would submit that yesterday&#039;s good LibDem byelection results fit ICM&#039;s 21 rather than Yougov&#039;s 14 , what evidence can you submit to support Yougov&#039;s figure ?
  When the detailed data for this poll is out , you can calculate pretty well what Populus and Comres and to a large extent Mori would have put out as a published figure and do the same for their polls but because of their very different polling and methodology you cannot do this with Yougov&#039;s data .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke you cannot say that the LibDems have gone from 14 to 21 so this poll is a rogue . Because of their different methodologies Yougov always give LibDems a low rating and ICM a high rating . Populus and Comres with their methodologies being in between . The change in ICM from the previous ICM/Guardian poll is + 3 which is feasible .<br />
  What nonone knows of course is whose methodology is the correct one . Is Yougov&#8217;s 14 the right level or ICM&#8217;s 21 or somewhere in between . Of course we will all prefer to believe that the one most favourable to the party we support is the right one .<br />
  I therefore put more trust in ICM than Yougov , you probably the opposite but this is really just faith on our parts. I would submit that yesterday&#8217;s good LibDem byelection results fit ICM&#8217;s 21 rather than Yougov&#8217;s 14 , what evidence can you submit to support Yougov&#8217;s figure ?<br />
  When the detailed data for this poll is out , you can calculate pretty well what Populus and Comres and to a large extent Mori would have put out as a published figure and do the same for their polls but because of their very different polling and methodology you cannot do this with Yougov&#8217;s data .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</title>
		<link>http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073/comment-page-2#comment-285673</link>
		<dc:creator>Cllr Peter Cairns (SNP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/1073#comment-285673</guid>
		<description>Last ICM poll ( 10yh Nov 2007) had

Tory 43%, Labour 35%, LibDem 15%, Others 8%, the new poll has,
Tory 37%, Labour 31%, LibDem 21%, Others 11%.

The guardian has it as bad news for Labour, but they will like most papers be comparing it to &quot;their&quot; last poll, not the most recent.

It actually has the Tories down more than Labour (-6% as opposed to -4%), the Libdems up 6% must be a relief for them, but then it&#039;s only one poll.  

The &quot;Other&quot;s being up is interesting, I wonder if the Yougov figure showing the SNP ahead of Labour would be replicated when we see the tables, although I don&#039;t think ICM show Scotland as such.

Yet again I&#039;d love to see a good (1,000+) poll for Scotland.

Peter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last ICM poll ( 10yh Nov 2007) had</p>
<p>Tory 43%, Labour 35%, LibDem 15%, Others 8%, the new poll has,<br />
Tory 37%, Labour 31%, LibDem 21%, Others 11%.</p>
<p>The guardian has it as bad news for Labour, but they will like most papers be comparing it to &#8220;their&#8221; last poll, not the most recent.</p>
<p>It actually has the Tories down more than Labour (-6% as opposed to -4%), the Libdems up 6% must be a relief for them, but then it&#8217;s only one poll.  </p>
<p>The &#8220;Other&#8221;s being up is interesting, I wonder if the Yougov figure showing the SNP ahead of Labour would be replicated when we see the tables, although I don&#8217;t think ICM show Scotland as such.</p>
<p>Yet again I&#8217;d love to see a good (1,000+) poll for Scotland.</p>
<p>Peter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

