The average Tory lead in June’s Voting intention polls so far is around 5 points, with the Tories in the low forties, Labour up in the high thirties. The level of party support appears to have settled down since the fading of the “rally round the flag” effect in May.

Looking away from the coronavirus polling it is now almost two months since Keir Starmer became Labour leader, so we have an initial chance to see how he’s registered with the general public.

When I write about results for “who would make the best Prime Minister?” question on social media I often get comments along the lines of “its easier to look like a good Prime Minister when you are Prime Minister”. This is correct, but it doesn’t devalue the question. It is indeed easier to look Prime Ministerial when you are Prime Minister, and this is an advantage that the PM will enjoy in real life, and will enjoy come any election. It is not the case that Prime Ministers always lead on this question. When he was leader of the opposition Tony Blair was consistently ahead of John Major on this question, David Cameron often polled ahead of Gordon Brown. Therefore Starmer’s ratings in his first few months look promising – YouGov had him neck-and-neck with Boris Johnson earlier this month, the latest Opinium poll for the Observer has him two points ahead of Johnson as preferred PM.

Questions asking about Starmer in his own right also seem positive. He has solidly positive approval ratings from YouGov, Ipsos MORI, Survation and Opinium. YouGov’s questions on leader attributes give him strongly positive ratings on being decisive, strong, competent and likeable. By 40% to 32% people say he does look like a Prime Minister in waiting.

It is a cliche to say that first impressions count, but that doesn’t mean it is untrue. History is littered with opposition leaders who really didn’t come across as being capable or substantial figures in their early months in the role and never recovered. Starmer became leader at an unusual time – the coronavirus outbreak very much dictated what he spoke about and concentrated upon. It gave him an immediate challenge of getting his response right to a major crisis. In one sense this is an opportunity – it is a large, serious issue where the leader of the opposition can show they are a serious politician with serious things to say. However, it also brings the risk of being ignored as an irrelevance, or being seen as opportunistic if you pitch it wrong (compare and contrast with the failed Tory leaders during their period in opposition – Iain Duncan Smith became Tory leader immediately after 911… and was ignored; William Hague shortly before the death of Princess Diana, and struggled to speak for the people in a way that came naturally to Tony Blair). Judging by his initial poll ratings, Starmer appears to have passed this initial test.

It’s worth noting that all the polling I’ve referred to here comes from before the sacking of Rebecca Long-Bailey. While that is certainly important for what it tells us about Starmer’s willingness to stamp his authority upon his party, I don’t expect it to make much difference to this figures (realistically the sacking of a shadow cabinet minister is not often something that produces any reverberations beyond the most seasoned Westminster watchers). But as ever, we shall see.

Right now Starmer’s popularity isn’t translating into a polling lead for the Labour party, but having a leader with a popular image who is seen as a plausible Prime Minister gives them the right foundation should the Government’s support falter. The Conservative Government has two huge challenges ahead of them (Brexit and Corona). Either would be daunting alone, let alone both together. For the past few years they have faced the luxury of being up against a not particularly effective opposition, riven by internal divides and with a leader whose support was deep rather than wide. It’ll be interesting to see how they cope with their challenges when they are up against a more substantial opposition.

1,603 Responses to “The public’s first impressions of Keir Starmer”

1 31 32 33
  1. CBX

    Indeed, Wales is a different polity. NI is a different polity. Unionists from such areas have their own reasons for wanting to maintain the integrity of the current UK (as they had for the former larger UK).

    I’m more than content for those polities to choose for themselves whether they remain united with England or not, in their current relationship.

    I make no attempt to change the views of others on here (chance would be a fine thing!), simply to suggest that the certainties that some express as to the benefits to its component parts, of the UK Union may be misrepresented by those whose agenda may not concentrate on Scotland’s best interests.

    There are valid arguments for most political stances. but almost never any certainties as to the outcomes of their being in place.


    re India – another key thing to know would be geographical spread of cases, as well as how different the measures applied within different states have been.

    Climate variation could be important in that too – there are three Indian-born gents within one small team that I work closely with, and whilst they all actively identify as being from India, they also tend to regard each other as hailing from different continents more than different states :-)

    It’s a shame that (unlike say the US) worldometers doesn’t seem to have state-level data for India. It would be particularly interesting to see how areas that were far from the initial outbreak centres fare when restrictions are eased, and might give more meaningful figures than x/million across the whole country.

  3. @CBX1985

    Interesting back and forth on the US polls. It remains to be seen whether the swing state polls are more accurate this time, and it’s fair to point out that in some states they were way off last time.

    That said, when you look at state numbers (such as we have them so far!) against the national picture, it’s very consistent.

    In 2016, national polls had Clinton a few points head, which was pretty much spot on to the final result. Polls in a slew of swing states showed Clinton running ahead of her national polling, hence all the Blue Firewall talk. And in the actual election, many of those states were a few points better for Trump than his national polls, so he won various of them by small margins despite being behind by a couple of points nationally.

    We have very limited state data so far, but the polls in the states @CROSSBAT11 quoted are generally showing a similar variance – ie Trump doing 2 or 3 points better than his national polling in those same states where he beat it in 2016. It’s just this time both national and state leads are about 6 points better for the Dems than they were in the 2016 results.

    It doesn’t mean they’re necessarily right of course, even at this stage. After embarrassing themselves and their paying customers in 2016, it’s not at all beyond the realm of possibility that pollsters have made methodological adjustments to their state polling that we’ll look back on as actually being a pretty big thumb on the scales to bring state polls into line with the national ones when it’s not necessarily warranted.

    But it seems to me that the most likely explanation for the numbers we’re seeing at the moment is that Trump is in fact doing significantly worse at this point than when he won in 2016. Tho I do stick to the idea that these numbers could well be much more variable over the next few months than in the same stage of previous campaigns, because there is such an unusually drastic amount of uncertainty about fundamental things like the economy and freedom of action.

1 31 32 33

Leave a Reply

NB: Before commenting please make sure you are familiar with the Comments Policy. UKPollingReport is a site for non-partisan discussion of polls.

You are not currently logged into UKPollingReport. Registration is not compulsory, but is strongly encouraged. Either login here, or register here (commenters who have previously registered on the Constituency Guide section of the site *should* be able to use their existing login)