Mayor of London

2016 Election


ZAC GOLDSMITH (Conservative) Born 1975, Westminster, son of Sir Jimmy Goldsmith, the founder of the Referendum party. Educated at Eton, where he was expelled for posession of cannabis. Former Environmental activist and editor of The Ecologist. MP for Richmond Park since 2010.
SADIQ KHAN (Labour) Born 1970, London. Educated at Ernest Bevin School. Former Solicitor specialising in Human Rights and former Chair of Liberty. Wandsworth councillor 1994-2006. MP for Tooting since 2005. PPS to Jack Straw 2007, government whip 2007-08, Under-Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government 2008-09, Minister of State for Transport 2009-10, Shadow Justice Secretary 2010-2015. Managed Ed Miliband`s successful leadership campaign in 2010.
SIAN BERRY (Green) born 1974, Cheltenham. Educated at Pate’s Grammar School and Trinity College, Oxford. Former medical copywriter, now a sustainable transport campaigner. Principle Speaker of the Green party 2006-2007. Camden councillor since 2014. Contested Hampstead and Highgate 2005. Green party mayoral candidate 2008
CAROLINE PIDGEON (Liberal Democrat) Born 1972. Educated at Thornden Secondary and the University of Wales Aberystwyth. Deputy leader of Southwark council 2002-2004. GLA londonwide member since 2008. Contested Dulwich and West Norwood 2001, Vauxhall 2010. Awarded an MBE in 2013 for public and political service.
PETER WHITTLE (UKIP) Born 1961, Peckham. Educated at University of Kent. Journalist and founder of New Culture Forum. Contested London region 2014 European election, Eltham 2015.
DAVID FURNESS (BNP) Computer programmer. Contested Ealing North 2010, Feltham and Heston 2011 by-election, London 2014 European election
GEORGE GALLOWAY (Respect) Born 1954, Dundee. Educated at Harris Academy. MP for Glasgow Hillhead 1987-1997, MP for Glasgow Kelvin 1997-2005, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow 2005-2010, MP for Bradford West 2012-2015. A flamboyant left-winger, talented orator and outspoken critic of Tony Blair and George W Bush, long involved in Palestinian and Arab causes. He opposed the 1991 Gulf war and travelled to Iraq several times, meeting both Saddam Hussein and Tariq Aziz and in 1998 founded a charity to campaign against sanctions on Iraq. He opposed the Iraq War and in 2003 was expelled from the Labour party for making comments encouraging British troops to refuse to obey illegal orders, he subsequently helped found the Respect party. He was elected in Bethnal Green and Bow in 2005 on a pledge to serve only one term, in 2010 he contested the neighbouring seat but lost. He returned again in the 2012 Bradford West by-election, winning on a huge swing but losing the seat at he following election.
PAUL GOLDING (Britain First) Sevenoaks councillor 2009-2011. Contested Sevenoaks 2010 for the BNP, Wales 2014 European elections for Britain First
LEE HARRIS (CISTA) Born South Africa. Owner of a headshop.
SOPHIE WALKER (Womens Equality) Born 1971, Scotland. Educated at City University. Journalist
JOHN ZYLINKSKI (Independent) Born 1951, Lewisham. Property developer.
ANKIT LOVE (One Love) Educated at Bishop Cotton School and American Community School, Cobham. Artist and filmmaker

2012 Election
Boris Johnson (Conservative) 971931 44.0% (+0.8%)
Ken Livingstone (Labour) 889918 40.3% (+3.3%)
Jenny Jones (Green) 98913 4.5% (+1.3%)
Brian Paddick (Liberal Democrat) 91774 4.2% (-5.6%)
Siobhan Benita (Independent) 83914 3.8% (n/a)
Lawrence Webb (Fresh Choice for London) 43274 2.0% (+1.1%)
Carlos Cortiglia (BNP) 28751 1.3% (-1.6%)
MAJORITY 82013 3.7% (-1.5%)
Turnout 38.1% (-7.2%)
Boris Johnson (Conservative) 1054811 51.5% (-1.7%)
Ken Livingstone (Labour) 992273 48.5% (+1.7%)
MAJORITY 62538 3.0% (-3.4%)
Boris Johnson (Conservative) born 1964, New York, USA. Son of Stanley Johnson, former MEP, and brother of Jo Johnson, MP for Orpington. Educated at Eton and Oxford, a contemporary of David Cameron. Author, television presenter and journalist. Worked as a columnist on the Daily Telegraph and as editor of The Spectator. Instantly recognisable by his dishevelled appearance, blond thatch of hair and bumbling public-schoolboy mannerisms, he has become a media celebrity through appearances on Have I Got News For You and tendency to make gaffes. As shadow minister for arts under Michael Howard he survived being made to publically apologise to Liverpool over an editoral in the Spectator that accused them of wallowing in victimhood, but not the revelation (that he had previously described as "an inverted pyramid of piffle") that he had been conducting an affair with Petronella Wyatt. MP for Henley 2001-2008. Shadow minister for higher education 2005-2007. Mayor of London since 2008.
Ken Livingstone (Labour) born 1945, Lambeth. Educated at Tulse Hill Comprehensive and then trained as a teacher. Former Lambeth and Camden councillor. GLC member for Norwood from 1973-1977. GLC member for Hackney North and Stoke Newington 1977-1981. GLC member for Paddington 1981-1986. Contested Parliamentary seat in Hampstead 1979. Contested leadership of the Labour group on the GLC in 1980, losing to Andrew McIntosh. The day after Labour's victory in the GLC elections of 1981 he successfully challenged McIntosh to become the leader of the GLC. Livingstone led a left-wing populist regime in County Hall with a tendency toward symbolic acts of defiance towards the Conservative government it faced across the Thames. Livingstone's policy of subsidised public transport fares was struck down as unlawful, he declared London a nuclear free zone and extended an official invitation to Gerry Adams at a time when he was banned from the mainland. Livingstone resigned as leader and from the GLC in 1984 to fight a by-election on the issue of opposing the abolition of the GLC. Livingstone won the by-election, but the GLC was abolished at the end of 1986. Elected as MP for Brent East 1987. He served for two years on the Labour party NEC, but wa largely a marginal figure as an MP, appearing on TV game shows and writing newspaper columns. Following the establishment of an elected London mayor Livingstone was keen to run and sought the Labour nomination, but was opposed by Tony Blair and lost Labour's electoral college vote to the former cabinet minister Frank Dobson. Livingstone subsequently ran as an Independent candidate and was expelled from the Labour party. Following his election as an independent mayor he was re-admitted to the Labour party in 2004 and re-elected as mayor in 2004. As mayor Livingstone has twice been investigated by the Standards Board of England, the first over allegations of a fight at a party, the second after he compared a Jewish reporter to a concentration camp guard. Livingstone was cleared of the first accusation, the second resulted in a four week suspension from the office, which was later overturned by the the High Court.
Jenny Jones (Green) Born 1949, Brighton. Educated at UCL. Former financial controller and archaeologist. Southwark councillor 2006-2010. Londonwide assembly member since 2000. Deputy mayor of London 2003-2004. Contested Dulwich and West Norwood 2005, Camberwell and Peckham 2010.
Brian Paddick (Liberal Democrat) born 1958, Balham. Educated at Bec Grammar School and Oxford University. A former police officer, he served as Police Commander for the borough of Lambeth from 2000-2002 and Deputy Assistant Commissioner from 2003-2007. During his time in charge of policing in Lambeth he pursued a softly-softly approach to drug use, not arresting or charging people for cannabis possession, and became known as one of the most senior openly gay police officers.
Siobhan Benita (Independent) born 1971, Wimbledon. Educated at the Ursuline High School and Warwick University. Former civil servant.
Lawrence Webb (UKIP) UKIP party organiser and former electrician. Contested Hornchurch 2005, London assembly list 2008, Hornchurch and Upminster 2010.
Carlos Cortiglia (BNP) Born Uruguay. Press officer and radio producer.
Comments - 631 Responses on “Mayor of London”
  1. Using Foot, Kinnock and Miliband as precedents is problematic. Look what happened at the GEs they all contested.

    I’m NOT saying that Corbyn will win in 2020 (it’s further than ever!), just that using local election results as a predictor of the general election is very faulty.

    This is the point being made constantly in the news, as if Corbyn making Foot’s type of gains in 1981 would’ve meant he was in contention in key Parliamentary constituencies.

    In 2012 and 2014, Labour took back control of Harlow and Crawley respectively. In the general, Ed made no difference whatsoever.

  2. A lot of nonsense is spoken about past comparisons.
    I think our base comparisons this year are
    2011, 2012 and 2015 depending on which set of results it is.
    But saying a party has to gain 1,000 seats on a completely different round than a party in 1981 (when the base is 1977) is obviously not like with like.

  3. I am actually a bit disappointed with the C results. Not because they are disastrous, but because I think at the start of the year we had an opportunity to do genuinely well ( a bit like 2011).
    This year has been a bit of a draw.

    The big plus from a C point of view is Scotland.

  4. Comparisons with past gain/losses are flawed, for several reasons. First, because they are clearly influenced to a large extent by what went before (1981 was bouncing back from the 1977 locals, when the Tories led by 15 points; this time the comparison was with a round where Labour had a clear lead). Second, because there are less councillors now than was once the case so it is harder to make such monumental numbers of gains/losses. Third, different numbers and combinations of seats are being contested each year and the potential for gains is clearly influenced by that. So whilst I’m no natural defender of Corbyn I don’t think it would be fair to hang him for failing to match Foot and Miliband’s initial gain counts.

    The projected national share comparison is more useful. History suggests that strong leads on that are a necessary though not sufficient condition for getting into government, and that ultimately successful opposition leaders (only Blair and Cameron since the measure began in 1982) have pulled out a big lead in the first year they’ve contested locals.

  5. Was the Tory lead 15% in 1977. Looking through the results it does look like the most enormous landslide?
    I had thought it looked like a 50%+ vote to Labour in the low 30s but perhaps Jack has a projected vote?

  6. I am going by opinion polls from around the time (I’m not sure they did projections then?). It may well have been an even greater margin on the night.

  7. LANCS OBSERVER – the “after a year”stat is arbitrary and misleading. Corbyn has faced an onslaught which no other political leader has ever had from the press. He has suffered open attacks from his own side. He has come in shortly after a labour collapse in Scotland, which is probably the biggest real shift in British politics since the 1920s. The result isn’t great for him, but it isn’t bad either. I genuinely believe Labour’s best chance in 2020 is to hold on to Corbyn, and hope his personal qualities win through.

  8. Your estimate may well have been right, it’s just that I’ve never been able to find one and was intrigued.

    I did see a projection of Tories at 48pc in 1976. Given there was clearly a further swing from 1976>77 I think they could have nudged past 50.
    Labour probably did still manage nearly 35pc but had a terrible night on seats (as did the Libs).

  9. But they also need some of the MPs who are in open revolt, like John Mann & Michael Dugher, to shut up (or be shut up by deselection).

    If they ditch Corbyn, there will be a mass exodus to the Greens, and the replacement will be someone no better than Kendall, Yvette Cooper or Andy Burnham. Certain defeat.

  10. Final result now not due to be given till midnight! Maybe they shld’ve brought in some poll count clerks from Sunderland.

  11. Neil – that’s the very point!

    Foot, Kinnock & Miliband all gained seats a year into the job and then all still went on to lose the next General Election.

    Corbyn has managed to do worse than all of them.

  12. HH – I think the Tory lead/result was 22% ahead of Labour in 1977, but I’d have to dig out the stats.

    The Tories won almost every seat in Liverpool on the County Council so that gives you an idea of the lead that year.

  13. EcoWirral – I realise you’re an admirer, but what “personal qualities” of JC would these be?

    His oratory; age; past quotes; choice of Qs at PMQs; loss/permanent alienation of the Jewish vote from Bury to Eastwood?

    Even some of those on the far Left must realise anyone would be better than him.

    He’s principled, but that’s it.

    Either you deselect 90% of Labour MPs, or they’ll get rid of him in 2017/18. In fact in a contest would he even get the Nominations to be able to stand? Or have they changed the rules yet?

  14. LANCS OBSERVER – Principled is a start, but politics aside- he comes across as a normal person. A normal, honest person. Real people do have bad fashion sense, and can be scruffy. Real people do look like somebody’s dad/grandad. Even when he loses his rag, it’s with genuine passion, not a purple-faced tanttum from an out-of-touch elitist. His knowledge when asked questions is good enough that he can actually DEBATE issues. Wow!
    Admittedly, I wish he’d say more on the environment and electoral reform, but he is still a class act.

  15. I fear you’re right about him being ousted by the blairites, though. I should be pleased, as a Green Surge will follow, but I would actually like to see him as PM, because he’s the first person in ages with a chance to be who’s actually worth their salt!

  16. Thanks – 22% lead in 1977 does sound credible actually – perhaps 54% to 32%.

  17. Long delay on mayoral declaration so may as well run down expected Assembly line up, if intelligence about list seats is correct:


    Barnet and Camden – Andrew Dismore (LAB)
    Bexley and Bromley – Gareth Bacon (CON)
    Brent and Harrow – Navin Shah (LAB)
    City and East – Unmesh Desai (LAB)
    Croydon and Sutton – Steve O’Connell (CON)
    Ealing and Hillingdon – Onkar Sahota (LAB)
    Enfield and Haringey – Joanne McCartney (LAB)
    Greenwich and Lewisham – Len Duvall (LAB)
    Havering and Redbridge – Keith Prince (CON)
    Lambeth and Southwark – Florence Nosegbe (LAB)
    Merton and Wandsworth – Leonie Cooper (LAB)
    North East – Jennette Arnold (LAB)
    South West – Tony Arbour (CON)
    West Central – Tony Devenish (CON)

    So LAB 9 (+1) and CON 5 (-1)


    LAB (3) – Fiona Twycross, Tom Copley, Nicky Gavron
    CON (3) – Kemi Badenoch, Andrew Boff, Shaun Bailey
    GRN (2) – Sian Berry, Caroline Russell
    UKIP (2) – Peter Whittle, David Kurten
    LD (1) – Caroline Pidgeon

    So overall LAB 12 (-), CON 8 (-1), GRN 2 (-), UKIP 2 (+2), LD 1 (-1)

    Labour actually lose a list seat because of the gain in M&W. That means Murad Qureshi loses his seat. I wonder if he might end up contesting any Tooting by-election?

  18. Counts are unbelievably slow this year.

    In Liverpool it took them from 10.10pm to 5.10am just to declare the Mayoral result, after a 30% turnout!

    In London apparently it was all done electronically, but now the system has frozen.

  19. first pref
    SK: 1,148,716
    ZG: 909,755
    After first prefs
    Sadiq Khan: 1,310,143…..56.8%
    Zac Goldsmith: 994,614….43.2%

  20. I got this one wrong, and HH was right.

  21. To be honest I don’t think it’s the counting that’s slow. I was a guest at a count this year and I reckon the first result was counted by half 12 which is unprecedented in my experience. It was the declaration that took ages.

  22. Sunderland always seem to manage to declare the first results by 11pm in both Locals and the General.

    I see no reason why a declaration should take more than seconds, after the disputed ballots are gone through.

    I can see why London chose an electronic count, but haven’t we had these glitches each time here?

  23. “I got this one wrong, and HH was right.”

    It’s extremely hard to get a good handle on what’s happening in London unless have lived & felt it almost daily for a long time. Being one of those people, London predictions are consistently my best. But the flip side is that my feeling for what’s happening elsewhere is often pants. I always especially rate your insight into what small town midlands is thinking, which many of us and the polls totally missed at the GE.

  24. I was not very close with my prediction of “54%-46% or 53%-47%” – but I wasn’t very far off either. My two bets of GOLDSMITH getting between 35-40% first preferences and a KHAN win at 4/5 were winners though.

    I think most of us assumed a lowish turnout of around 36% but it ended up nearly 46%. I predicted 37.5% & the bigger turnout must have helped KHAN a good deal. The weather probably was a factor. I believe that the weather in 2012, when turnout was 38.2%, was not great whereas on Thursday it was beautiful – sunny and warm.

    One has to congratulate the pollsters as they got it pretty much spot on.

  25. London is a difficult one.
    It is unashamedly pro business and that provides the Tories with a solid base.
    But there is a lot of peer pressure from virtue signalling lefties intermingled with it all over the place.

    This result really shouldn’t be a surprise at all – it’s basically the General Election result so is in fact a bit better than the English locals for the Tories.

    I don’t know how much difference weather makes.
    Weather was quite bad on the same day as the 1979 election I think but it was high poll.
    Probably usually a plus but not always.

    I thought turnout would be just under 40pc before polling day, and had some hope that the gap could be down to 6 or 7pc but not surprised by this.

  26. I congratulate Sadiq on his becoming mayor of London. As the first Muslim mayor of London (and a pretty socially liberal person) I hope he takes strides to tackle the deeply rooted misogyny, homophobia and anti-Semitism which are rampant in Muslim communities across London and the UK. Unfortunately my hopes are pretty low as the Labour party (particularly the left of it) seems to have rather accepted the notion that anything Muslims do is correct regardless of how it goes against liberal principles that they might otherwise agree with (see for example the segregation of men and women in Labour meetings). I wish him luck with fixing these ills but due to the current trajectory of the Labour party I doubt he really bothers trying…

  27. If you told me 8 months ago that Sadiq Khan was going to win this thing (and with such a commanding vote) I wouldn’t have believed you. Even if it is London. Really thought for ages that Tessa Jowell was Labour’s only hope in the city. And if not her, possibly David Lammy. Nice to see how sorely mistaken I was about Khan.

  28. How can someone who predicted 53:47 claim that they were not far out?

    Khan’s final vote share was 56.8%, so that’s 3.8 points adrift in his vote, or 7.6 points out in the margin of his victory, which was 13.6%.

    That’s further wide of the mark than the 3-point polling error in last year’s GE.

  29. I’m on the left of the Labour Party and I assure you that I have always been opposed to sexism and misogyny. I don’t care whether it’s the Muslim community or anyone else. It’s not acceptable.

  30. Having lived for 12 years in a substantially Muslim part of London (Ilford) I simply don’t recognise Peppermint tea’s depiction of London’s Muslims as anti-Semitic, and mysoginistic, although it’s clear that many are not keen on gay rights – as are a significant proportion of evangelical Christians.

    Besides which Khan’s role as Mayor is a strategic one for the future development of London, rather than making him solely responsible for changing attitudes among Muslims.

  31. Some reflections on the London results as the recriminations begin:

    – Zac’s campaign is taking lots of flak but the fact is that the first preference totals were virtually identical to the 2015 GE in London. So he couldn’t do what Boris did and buck the trend, but nor did he do any worse than Tories usually do in London. And he outperformed the national 3% CON-LAB swing since the GE.
    – Fundamentally I think Zac was just a weak candidate. To me it was quite clear from before he was even selected that he was no Boris (I said so on here, so this isn’t hindsight) but at the time many London Tories viewed him as the big hope to take on Boris’ mantle. He lacks charisma, any ability to think on his feet (just look at his cringeworthy answers when asked to name a Bollywood film and when put on the spot about London in the back of the cab by Norman Smith) and clearly hadn’t engaged much with London issues before his selection. Having said that, it is hard to see which other Tory might have been any better.
    – If Zac was to have a strength it may have been his ability to run as a virtual independent, perhaps focusing on the issues he feels passionately about like the environment. He didn’t really do that, his campaign in the end coming across as being controlled from CCHQ far more than Sadiq’s appeared to be controlled from Labour HQ. He didn’t really offer any reason for non-Tory voters to vote for him.
    – Lots has been made of the supposed racism of Zac’s campaign. I think this has to some extent been whipped up by Labour and probably had little or no effect on the result. But the line that Sadiq hung out with extremist at some point in the past, therefore he’s dangerous, had the severe disadvantage of being patently nonsense. The public are clever enough to see through that kind of thing.
    – Sadiq may have benefited from Corbyn’s election in the end, because it afforded him more distance from the Labour leadership than would have been the case if a moderate had won.
    – Sadiq ran a model campaign really. Wooed the membership by nominating Corbyn and rebelling on the Welfare Reform and Work Bill to get selection; shifted to the centre after being selected with pro-business articles in the Standard and City AM; hardly slipped up from then on, coming across really well in interview. He probably didn’t win over many who didn’t vote Labour in 2015, but he didn’t need to.
    – It is a long way back for the Tories in London now. 2020 will be virtually impossible to win, being held on the same day as a GE and with a Labour incumbent, and it is quite possible that by 2024 further demographic change will have made winning London even harder.

  32. I just wish that Ed Miliband’s 2015 campaign had been as well run at Khan’s.

  33. If a lesson is to be learnt from this campaign, it is that smear tactics only work if they amplify doubts that already exist in the minds of the electorate. You can’t make up anything you like and expect it to stick.

  34. Tooting will be an interesting By-election. Khan’s said he’ll stand down as an MP as soon as possible.

  35. @Polltroll

    You put it very well.

    If Labour wins the SNP will be very influential worked because it was true. Sadiq’s dangerous, Labour will get rid of the pound (Hague, 2001) and the Tories will kill off the NHS (Kinnock, 1992/ Miliband, 2015) all failed because they were clearly untrue.

  36. The Tories will try hard – not very far to travel for people based at Westminster to campaign, plus they are quite strong locally – but so will Labour, who will probably be able to call on a colossal number of activists for a London by-election.

    23rd June could be a tad risky, though Tooting is a strong Remain area so if Labour receive a backlash for being too pro-EU it probably won’t be felt there.

  37. Given that the Tories have declined in the polls since 2015, it is difficult to see them winning this by-election.

    The Goldsmith toxification of the Tories in London would just be the coup de grâce, let alone the problems that the Tories are causing themselves with academisation and junior doctors.

    Having said that, anything is possible in the current crazy world of politics.

  38. “If a lesson is to be learnt from this campaign, it is that smear tactics only work if they amplify doubts that already exist in the minds of the electorate. You can’t make up anything you like and expect it to stick.”

    And that’s how Ed Miliband was rejected. If he was electable he would’ve probably been able to manage any smear tactics thrown his way. He was ill prepared for it all and he walked into a lot of traps. The Ed Stone, his grilling on that QT special about Labour spending, Cameron waving the Liam Byrne note, and to a lesser extent the bacon sarnie picture on a tabloid front page.

  39. I think the Parties agreed the Referendum would not be held on the same day as any other elections.

    Quite apart from we wouldn’t want to delay a close UK-wide result ‘cos of Tooting.

  40. “One has to congratulate the pollsters as they got it pretty much spot on.”

    But you should remember that the one pollster (YouGov) which did polls for Greater London in the lead-up to the 2015GE also got it ‘pretty much spot on’ – in contrast to what happened in the GB-wide polls. And the last mayoral election in 2012 was a very rare case where the polls exaggerated the lead of the Tory candidate over Labour. London just doesn’t have the same history of polling errors overstating Labour at the expense of the Tories as other parts of England.

    We know form the post 2015 General Election enquiry that in other parts of Britain there were the ‘hard to reach’ voters who voted Conservative in 2015. I have a theory that London may have a roughly equal number of Labour voters – probably from ethnic minorities – who are similarly ‘unresponsive’ to pollsters but nevertheless turn out and vote.

  41. Is it the case that young people increasingly have relinquished a landline & thus there’s a bias to older voters (who are more likely to vote Tory? And this phenomenom is slightly more pronounced in London.

  42. Three quarters of the polls are online rather than by phone.

    Besides, the polling anomaly I was seeking to address was that the over-estimation of Labour (and underestimation of the Conservatives) seen elsewhere in GB appears not to apply in London. So whatever causes this elsewhere is either absent in London, or equalled out by some other factor which reduces the Labour VI in London polls.

  43. London Elects have published the borough and ward level data today -

    Loads of stuff to dig out of it, but firstly the borough vote (1st preferences):

    Boroughs carried by Goldsmith:

    Barnet – Goldsmith 48.3%, Khan 34.6%
    Bexley – Goldsmith 49.7%, Khan 26.1%
    Bromley – Goldsmith 52.9%, Khan 25.1%
    City of London – Goldsmith 40.4%, Khan 37.6%
    Croydon – Goldsmith 40.8%, Khan 40.2%
    Hammersmith and Fulham – Goldsmith 41.1%, Khan 39.8%
    Harrow – Goldsmith 48.1%, Khan 35.3% (great Tory result here in the context of the overall result!)
    Havering – Goldsmith 52.5%, Khan 21.7%
    Hillingdon – Goldsmith 47.6%, Khan 32.8%
    Kensington and Chelsea – Goldsmith 55.6%, Khan 28%
    Kingston-upon-Thames – Goldsmith 47.1%, Khan 29.3%
    Richmond-upon-Thames – Goldsmith 54.1%, Khan 25.6%
    Sutton – Goldsmith 44.8%, Khan 27.1%
    Westminster – Goldsmith 44.4%, Khan 38%

    Boroughs carried by Khan:

    Barking and Dagenham – Khan 50.6%, Goldsmith 23.2%
    Brent – Khan 50.9%, Goldsmith 30.0%
    Camden – Khan 51.1%, Goldsmith 27.3%
    Ealing – Khan 47.8%, Goldsmith 31.5%
    Enfield – Khan 46.7%, Goldsmith 35.3% (Tory vote continuing to fall off a cliff here)
    Greenwich – Khan 46.9%, Goldsmith 29.5%
    Hackney – Khan 66.7%, Goldsmith 12.1%
    Haringey – Khan 60.1%, Goldsmith 17.7%
    Hounslow – Khan 43.3%, Goldsmith 36.1%
    Islington – Khan 60.4%, Goldsmith 17%
    Lambeth – Khan 56.1%, Goldsmith 21.4%
    Lewisham – Khan 56.8%, Goldsmith 19.4%
    Merton – Khan 43.7%, Goldsmith 37.4%
    Newham – Khan 65.3%, Goldsmith 17.4%
    Redbridge – Khan 46.9%, Goldsmith 37.3%
    Southwark – Khan 55%, Goldsmith 19.4%
    Tower Hamlets – Khan 61.3%, Goldsmith 17.9%
    Waltham Forest – Khan 53.2%, Goldsmith 24%
    Wandsworth – Khan 43.3%, Goldsmith 40.8% (this one would not have been expected to fall into Sadiq’s column)

  44. Very interesting – as someone who is not based near London, Khan did better than I expected in Southwark, Redbridge, and the City of London; and Goldsmith did better than I expected in Barnet (although for reasons I can guess), Hillingdon and Croydon.

  45. Thanks to JS.
    HARROW is a shock – does this further confirm that British-Indians are falling behind CON?

    WANDWORTH was a surprise, yes. (punishing GOLSMITHs campaign?)

  46. RE HARROW – WOULD SAY THIS RESULT in the GLA makes starting reading for anyone wanting to be the PPC in HARROW EAST.

  47. Some interesting results in Merton & Wandsworth. Khan beat Goldsmith in Abbey and Trinity and got within 300 of him in Wimbledon Park and Dundonald. That said Goldsmith just about carried Cannon Hill, West Barnes, and Lower Morden.

  48. Kahn absolutely smashed Goldsmith in his own Tooting constituency he even won Nightingale ward! Assuming I typed the numbers into the calculator correctly Kahn also won the Battersea constituency by 81 votes lol.

  49. Though I wonder why Kahn did fairly poorly in Croydon? I expected he’d win it easily. Labour were even ahead there by a not insignificant margin at the last general election…

  50. Though with Battersea I imagine Goldsmith would have won it if you took into account postal votes as Goldsmith was ahead by over 4,000 in postal votes in Wandsworth. I guess it is worth remembering when analysing ward level results that postal votes lean Tory virtually everywhere but they aren’t included in ward level data.

Leave a Reply

NB: Before commenting please make sure you are familiar with the Comments Policy. UKPollingReport is a site for non-partisan discussion of polls.

You are not currently logged into UKPollingReport. Registration is not compulsory, but is strongly encouraged. Either login here, or register here (commenters who have previously registered on the Constituency Guide section of the site *should* be able to use their existing login)